Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > A Question of Legality
test
A Question of Legality Post your legal questions here (general, nothing of a personal nature)

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70811
biomed163436
Yssup Rider61105
gman4453298
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48740
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42962
The_Waco_Kid37266
CryptKicker37224
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2013, 12:37 PM   #1
Roger.Smith
Valued Poster
 
Roger.Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 28, 2012
Location: Keller
Posts: 1,732
Encounters: 22
Default Aqcuittal for shooting Escort. Services not rendered.

I was always under the belief that using a gun during the commission of a crime escalated charges. I'm unclear how this would be different that shooting someone over another type of illegal transaction.


A jury in Bexar County, Texas just acquitted Ezekiel Gilbert of charges that he murdered a 23-year-old Craigslist escort—agreeing that because he was attempting to retrieve the $150 he'd paid to Frago, who wouldn't have sex with him, his actions were justified.
Gilbert had admitted to shooting Lenora Ivie Frago in the neck on Christmas Eve 2009, when she accepted $150 from Gilbert and left his home without having sex with him. Frago, who was paralyzed by the shooting, died several months later.
Gilbert's defense argued that the shooting wasn't meant to kill, and that Gilbert's actions were justified, because he believed that sex was included as part of the fee. Texas law allows people "to use deadly force to recover property during a nighttime theft."
The 30-year-old hugged his defense attorneys after the "not guilty" verdict was read by the judge. If convicted, he could have faced life in prison. He thanked God, his lawyers, and the jury for being able to "see what wasn't the truth."
Roger.Smith is offline   Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 05:38 PM   #2
Stockinglover
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 10, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 642
Encounters: 3
Default

Wow that is some fucked up shit!!! Damn.
Stockinglover is offline   Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 05:54 PM   #3
instfixer
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 25, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 739
Encounters: 4
Default

While it escalated the charges...

The jury found the guy 'not guilty'

The defense lawyer EASILY cost $30,000 and I think MORE like $50,000+ !!

Do you think he should have just let her go? Yes he would be out $150 but he could sleep that night. Except he had nightmares for 3 1/2 years
instfixer is offline   Quote
Old 06-06-2013, 08:30 PM   #4
threepeckeredbillygoat
Valued Poster
 
threepeckeredbillygoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 12, 2010
Location: At your Mama's house
Posts: 1,859
Encounters: 9
Default

Yup, its fucked up. Every now and them some sorry motherfucker gets away with murde. Casey Anthony, OJ, Robert Blake, ect. Its a damn shame.
threepeckeredbillygoat is offline   Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:40 PM   #5
Roger.Smith
Valued Poster
 
Roger.Smith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 28, 2012
Location: Keller
Posts: 1,732
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by instfixer View Post
While it escalated the charges...

The jury found the guy 'not guilty'

The defense lawyer EASILY cost $30,000 and I think MORE like $50,000+ !!

Do you think he should have just let her go? Yes he would be out $150 but he could sleep that night. Except he had nightmares for 3 1/2 years

True. It ended up being the most expensive session of his life. I'm not a lawyer, I would have thought the fact that it was an illegal transaction would have negated the robbery and the jury would have been instructed as such. I guess not.
Roger.Smith is offline   Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 04:17 PM   #6
Jewish Lawyer
Valued Poster
 
Jewish Lawyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 28, 2012
Location: Tel Aviv
Posts: 6,287
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger.Smith View Post
True. It ended up being the most expensive session of his life. I'm not a lawyer, I would have thought the fact that it was an illegal transaction would have negated the robbery and the jury would have been instructed as such. I guess not.
So under your theory, if you go to a prostitute and pay her for sex, which in Texas is illegal, can she shoot you and not be prosecuted, because you don't have "clean hands"?

clean hands doctrine n. a rule of law that a person coming to court with a lawsuit or petition for a court order must be free from unfair conduct (have "clean hands" or not have done anything wrong) in regard to the subject matter of his/her claim. His/her activities not involved in the legal action can be abominable since it is considered irrelevant. As an affirmative defense (positive response) a defendant might claim the plaintiff (party suing him/her) has a "lack of clean hands" or "violates the clean hands doctrine" because the plaintiff has misled the defendant or has done something wrong regarding the matter under consideration. Example: A former partner sues on a claim that he was owed money on a consulting contract with the partnershiip when he left, but the defense states that the plaintiff (party suing) has tried to get customers from the partnership by spreading untrue stories about the remaining partner's business practices. (See: affirmative defense)
Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.
Jewish Lawyer is offline   Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 10:18 PM   #7
Alina Lili
Pending Age Verification
 
User ID: 151969
Join Date: Sep 9, 2012
Location: Los Angeles/ Austin
Posts: 17
Default

Ethics and logic? I abhor anyone who thinks this is a case of "she got what was coming".
The legal codes? Any good defense lawyer will use this, it's their job.
This specific law? I don't care for it but it swings both ways.
Ezekiel Gilbert? Really? A machine gun while she leaves? If you believe this is right in your head, it's your head that should be checked.
The jury? Disgusting.
Alina Lili is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 01:45 AM   #8
KittyLamour
The Original Freak Doll
 
KittyLamour's Avatar
 
User ID: 44612
Join Date: Sep 13, 2010
Location: SW Fort Worth
My Bio Page
Posts: 3,459
My ECCIE Reviews
Default

It is an absolute shame that this travesty of justice occurred in the United States of America. Reading that made me sick....
KittyLamour is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 07:47 AM   #9
Jimmiwad
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 17, 2010
Location: Rear end of Texas
Posts: 1,113
Encounters: 23
Default

This is just wrong. Maybe the Mexican Mafia will set it right. If anyone deserves a bullet behind the ear it is this asshole.
Killing a young pretty girl over $150 lousy dollars. Un fukin believable.
Jimmiwad is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 08:06 AM   #10
straightshooter30
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2012
Location: Puritanical New England
Posts: 131
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger.Smith View Post
<snip>... I would have thought the fact that it was an illegal transaction would have negated the robbery and the jury would have been instructed as such. I guess not.
In the Maine Zumba case, the judge ruled because the act was illegal, clients had no expectation of privacy regarding the illegally video recording of the session... Some legal scholars said it was narrow focused and wouldn't likely set a precedent...
straightshooter30 is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 08:49 AM   #11
Sidewinder
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Huntsville AL
Posts: 1,428
Default

Roger, everyone, read the Texas statutes on use of force and use of deadly force.

You might be surprised by what you learn.
Sidewinder is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 10:27 AM   #12
ck1942
Meet & Greet Organizer
 
ck1942's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 17, 2009
Location: "Hobbyverse"
Posts: 7,112
Encounters: 181
Default

Use of force statutes aside,

1) a deplorable act - violent reaction to a "theft" of cash. I am assuming this happened in the man's house and not in a hotel room which might have made a difference.

2) a jury presented, most likely, with judicial instructions regarding the statutes. Cannot blame the jurors in this instance, even if they wanted to revolt and find him guilty.

3) karma rulez and the provider's survivors will (if they haven't already) file a serious civil suit despite the criminal jury's verdict.

Yes there is some culpability on the part of the provider's for cash and dash, but the consequences seriously out of whack with the act.

Karma will more or less make things even, especially if the jerk with the weapon has a handle anywhere on an escort board and gets outed there. No doubt his physical address plus his name are easily discovered.
ck1942 is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 05:24 PM   #13
natasteewsym
BANNED
 
natasteewsym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Burger King bathroom at North Lamar and Rutland
Posts: 205
Encounters: 3
Default

Wow, this is good news. Good riddance to the thief.
natasteewsym is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 05:58 PM   #14
skirtchaser79411
Valued Poster
 
skirtchaser79411's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 16, 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 3,507
Encounters: 69
Default

So does this mean all girls that do cash and dash or fuck you over are fair game
skirtchaser79411 is offline   Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 06:22 PM   #15
natasteewsym
BANNED
 
natasteewsym's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 22, 2012
Location: Burger King bathroom at North Lamar and Rutland
Posts: 205
Encounters: 3
Default

Damn right skirtchaser.
natasteewsym is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved