Slave G proves once again she lacks discretion. She is all about herself.... Don't make the mistake guys!

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Godfather I believe her supports were asked NOT to post on her behalf.

hmm... So the Incompetent one was NOT worthy of a request from her to stay out of it huh? Maybe a sacrificial lamb of sorts to be offered up in hopes of appeasing those that want to joust?

A few of us have suspected that she has pleaded with her minions to stay caged in their pens.....

so interesting that she has such a firm grasp on their balls.... They bark when she asks them too as well as sit and whimper when she commands..... Very telling wouldn't you agree?

As one supporter on this side has mentioned....... It's kind of like fishing.....

You try different lures..... different baits......

a nibble here..... a bite there.......

I agreed to take a slower approach with the trolling..... but I lack patience... I guess others are fortunate that the young ladies in my life need attention as well.... But this tackle box still has a few lures and the Bait Shop simply fills with new things to try....

SO we will continue to chum the waters......

or we can get rid of the finesse and simply drop some dynamite to blow things up and see what floats to the surface.....

Maybe some emails, PMs and Text Logs should be posted?.....

well... certainly not here but we have a place where that stuff is encouraged.......

Kind of like her TWITTER feeds where she slams ECCIE and re posts the PMS she receives.... but closer to home here.....

Anyway..... when is the best time to cast a line? early morning just before the sun comes up?

[mayorcastro]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

If all of SLAVE'S White Knights were at the Alamo it could have changed history!

Well shit, There were only 5,000 Mexicans at the Battle of the Alamo because they only had 4 Pick-up trucks.

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by Whispers

hmm... So the Incompetent one was NOT worthy of a request from her to stay out of it huh? Maybe a sacrificial lamb of sorts to be offered up in hopes of appeasing those that want to joust?

A few of us have suspected that she has pleaded with her minions to stay caged in their pens.....

so interesting that she has such a firm grasp on their balls.... They bark when she asks them too as well as sit and whimper when she commands..... Very telling wouldn't you agree?

As one supporter on this side has mentioned....... It's kind of like fishing.....

You try different lures..... different baits......

a nibble here..... a bite there.......

I agreed to take a slower approach with the trolling..... but I lack patience... I guess others are fortunate that the young ladies in my life need attention as well.... But this tackle box still has a few lures and the Bait Shop simply fills with new things to try....

SO we will continue to chum the waters......

or we can get rid of the finesse and simply drop some dynamite to blow things up and see what floats to the surface.....

Maybe some emails, PMs and Text Logs should be posted?.....

well... certainly not here but we have a place where that stuff is encouraged.......

Kind of like her TWITTER feeds where she slams ECCIE and re posts the PMS she receives.... but closer to home here.....

Anyway..... when is the best time to cast a line? early morning just before the sun comes up?

Interesting observations indeed. But there is another factor... See when guys like me see a picture like this:



I see "CLOSED" time to move on to the next one! Others just can't take "NO" for an answer and lose their minds. That's when the craziness starts. I know your feelings on this matter Godfather they are in line with my own. Sadly other just don't feel that way.

[Whispers]

Others see that picture and think "Greek"?

[oldtiger]

I see that pic and think Home Depot.

[Whispers]

Originally Posted by Still Looking

Interesting observations indeed. But there is another factor... See when guys like me see a picture like this:



I see "CLOSED" time to move on to the next one!

Originally Posted by Whispers

Others see that picture and think "Greek"?

Originally Posted by oldtiger

I see that pic and think Home Depot.

LOL! You sir... need to get laid!

Unless of course you are going to buy a new pair of bolt cutters!

[Still Looking]

Originally Posted by Whispers

Others see that picture and think "Greek"?

Ok now that's why you are the Godfather... why didn't I think of that.

[Netx9]

Sorry for my absence as of late... RW responsibilities and a vacation and all... Methinks we are being had here and something else is afoot. In the original alert thread:

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1049598

PRSandra was basically accusing Guinevere of giving a bad reference and Guinevere was defending herself, and making sure all were aware of where her references/contact information come from - seems like just to help others avoid being given fake references.

In doing so, she addressed Sandra specifically with a recent vouch for bcharisma. Could that have been done in a pm? Sure. Does it merit the hyperbolic criticisms levied here... I'd say no because she was being accused of not providing a good reference by the op. Yes, she gives very detailed references including the brand of cover a gent may prefer. I can say for a fact, many providers appreciate her detail, including physical Description, all in an effort to keep other providers safe. To imply she gives other personal info without ever seeing one of her references is simply unfair, but fairness isn't the point of this thread.

Here's the odd part... PRSandra had already seen bcharisma and he reviewed her. See her reviews here:

http://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=29362

One in September last year and one in February this year:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=974547

Why would she ask for a reference of someone she had already seen just 2-3 months earlier?



Given their familiarity, it seems odd that she'd ask for a reference from Guinevere... Not sure why prsandra is banned but something seems really fishy here... Almost like a setup but who believes in conspiracy theories.

She didn't reveal any personal information that you couldn't already know by bcharisma's own reviews and posts - that he was interested in seeing prsandra. At near 200 yes reviews, solid acclaim by hobbyists and providers alike, the witch hunt by a select few with an agenda does not bode well for any other provider who crosses them in some way.

Finally, instead of starting this thread, a simple constructive comment to Guinevere would have been appropriate, but agendas need views, hence this thread.

[JohnnyYanks]

Originally Posted by Netx9

... Not sure why prsandra is banned but something seems really fishy here ... Almost like a setup ...

Do you think this is the source of all of those PM's "asking for help?" You know, the one's too afraid to speak out on the open forums?

[Netx9]

Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Do you think this is the source of all of those PM's "asking for help?" You know, the one's too afraid to speak out on the open forums?

Help with what, sir? She accused another provider of giving a bad reference openly which merits an open defense... G defended herself and let all know where her references come from... and now this thread... Which seems much more likely to engender fear among others who may want to speak out and disagree with you guys.

This thread is full of speculations and accusations and suspicions... I'm just adding mine to it with an analysis to back up my proposition and suspicion.

After all, a ban does mean someone did something wrong... Right?!

[Netx9]

Originally Posted by JohnnyYanks

Do you think this is the source of all of those PM's "asking for help?" You know, the one's too afraid to speak out on the open forums?

You mean like this "one" who expressed an opinion contrary to the likings of a few who piled on her?

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1063266

Nobody said your criticisms needed to be consistent but you could at least fake it.

[Guest092514]

So, I'm really trying to see both sides. Are Whispers and SL saying that because she used a guys handle and her phone number in the post, that it was potentially dangerous? I have tried to read it all but it gets too involved to sort it out, so I'm trying to keep it simple for stupid me. KISS!

[Netx9]

Originally Posted by sandy

So, I'm really trying to see both sides. Are Whispers and SL saying that because she used a guys handle and her phone number in the post, that it was potentially dangerous? I have tried to read it all but it gets too involved to sort it out, so I'm trying to keep it simple for stupid me. KISS!

I believe it is that she mentioned his handle and that she had vouched for him on a certain date. Their argument - that was indiscreet and not hers to share publicly. My point, his name is already associated to prsandra and Sandra was claiming she vouched for the guy who robbed her.

She listed her phone number (which is also on her showcase) to other providers to remind them how to contact her for references and verify someone has not given them a fake number for her.

[SofaKingFun]

Originally Posted by Netx9

Sorry for my absence as of late... RW responsibilities and a vacation and all... Methinks we are being had here and something else is afoot. In the original alert thread:

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1049598

PRSandra was basically accusing Guinevere of giving a bad reference and Guinevere was defending herself, and making sure all were aware of where her references/contact information come from - seems like just to help others avoid being given fake references.

In doing so, she addressed Sandra specifically with a recent vouch for bcharisma. Could that have been done in a pm? Sure. Does it merit the hyperbolic criticisms levied here... I'd say no because she was being accused of not providing a good reference by the op. Yes, she gives very detailed references including the brand of cover a gent may prefer. I can say for a fact, many providers appreciate her detail, including physical Description, all in an effort to keep other providers safe. To imply she gives other personal info without ever seeing one of her references is simply unfair, but fairness isn't the point of this thread.

Here's the odd part... PRSandra had already seen bcharisma and he reviewed her. See her reviews here:

http://www.eccie.net/member.php?u=29362

One in September last year and one in February this year:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=974547

Why would she ask for a reference of someone she had already seen just 2-3 months earlier?
You see? We shouldn't even be even having this discussion because she should have kept his handle out of her reply.

What is so difficult about this to understand?

Now we know that he had a session with Slave Guin...and intended to visit PRSANDRA...and are now questioning the reason, why.

Can you not understand how fucked up this could be and how much damage that can be done in sharing this sort of thing. (Maybe not in this instance, but certainly in others)....and you guys are giving her a pass and basically, saying that it's okay.

It absolutely is NOT OKAY!

Discretion has GOT to be exercised at all times, not just when it's convenient because who's to know when it could cause someone problems. Just keep that shit to yourself.
It really shouldn't be all that fucking difficult.
Why is it, then?


Given their familiarity, it seems odd that she'd ask for a reference from Guinevere... Not sure why prsandra is banned but something seems really fishy here... Almost like a setup but who believes in conspiracy theories.

She didn't reveal any personal information that you couldn't already know by bcharisma's own reviews and posts - that he was interested in seeing prsandra. At near 200 yes reviews, solid acclaim by hobbyists and providers alike, the witch hunt by a select few with an agenda does not bode well for any other provider who crosses them in some way.

Finally, instead of starting this thread, a simple constructive comment to Guinevere would have been appropriate, but agendas need views, hence this thread.

Damn ..

.

.

[OldYeller]

SofaKingFun says:
You see? We shouldn't even be even having this discussion because she should have kept his handle out of her reply.

What is so difficult about this to understand?

Now we know that he had a session with Slave Guin...and intended to visit PRSANDRA...and are now questioning the reason, why.

Can you not understand how fucked up this could be and how much damage that can be done in sharing this sort of thing. (Maybe not in this instance, but certainly in others)....and you guys are giving her a pass and basically, saying that it's okay.

/////////////////
Actually, what we know is someone who uses a specific handle has seen a specific gal (from his reviews) and that another knows him well enough to vouch for him.

Sandra had a problem with a Slave reference, and Slave was telling her that she vouched for someone else, not the guy Sandra complained about. Since Sandra made this public, what else could Slave do?

So the problem is that G mentioned a handle? Crap! Hey, SofaKingFun, I like ya, but I'm so sorry I just outed you!