The sheer level of self righteousness you all seem to have here is truly quite something.
My original post was intended to directly address and put to bed an ongoing issue that Anandaman had towards me.
It was abundantly clear that Anandaman had an issue with me that he hadn’t directly addressed to me, yet felt the need to publicly voice his opinions.
I originally pm’d him hoping we could discuss our differences in private, but when that proved ineffective I let it be and just assumed he had no interest in a resolution.
Time went on and I noticed that Anandaman yet again felt the need to comment negatively about me in a recent review of Katychina11 on oh2.
Being that I’m no longer on that site I decided to voice it here in this thread, hoping that by publicly addressing Anandaman as he did I, he’d maybe show up so that we can hash it out.
Hindsight 20/20 I should've refrained, because not only did Anandaman not respond, instead, I was met by you lot.
The situation between Lola and I simply comes down to who you choose to believe. My conduct in the past understandably makes it easy for you all to side with Lola. But at the end of the day, it purely boils down to who you choose to believe or not. And just because you may side with Lola, doesn't mean that I am automatically guilty just because my name is stained.
Touching on the part about me accessing the powder room on oh2, I didn't have access because I forced my way into it, I was granted access (big difference). I was told that Ck has already taken measures against those he thinks are affiliated with me in any capacity, and has since denied access to that forum from those respective accounts.
I personally don’t think that was the right thing to do on Ck's part, being that the particular forum contains valuable information that would aid in the protection of a lady against a hobbyist who’d likely cause them harm, but that was Ck’s ruling/solution.
I never intended to cause anyone harm in anyway (including you Lola), throughout my time in the hobby I unfortunately wrote some reviews that would cause for certain companions to have on going vendettas against me. As as consequence this has lead to rumors and lies being spread about me. I immediately felt the impact of one negative review in particular, this one of MistyMia (
https://home.ourhome2.net/showthread...isty-Mia/page2). After this review I noticed I wasn't able to gracefully book with certain providers anymore (notably the N-girls group, who I later learned was ran by an "actual" Pimp that was outed by none other than PeachySexy recently), see this thread for more info on the matter (
https://home.ourhome2.net/showthread...o-others/page3) not only that, MistyMia took it upon herself to spread lies and rumors about me that were not true. Due to that, a lot of drama ensued, I've only but tried to paint a clear picture against those lies and rumors. But my efforts in that have only aimed at furthering the existing disdain people have towards me.
The saying, "A Lie Can Travel Halfway Around the World While the Truth Is Putting On Its Shoes." Truly does prove true when it comes to me.
I'm going to address Chiefs3peat's most recent message and pxmcc's and I'll let you all continue your pitchfork parade.
Chiefs3peat, you mentioned that Anandaman only wants certain knowledge to go to him and his friends. He didn't want folks to wake up and realize why am I paying full price.
I don't know that to be for certain, but it does certainly seem that way. You keep saying how The Vetted has no customers and no women. If you read what the The Vetted's intended purpose was for, you'd know that's not its purpose after all anyways. And if the talk around town is that I receive free pussy, then that's perfectly fine by me. Last I checked it's a felony offense to compensate someone for sex, so from that standpoint I'm acting within the confounds of the law, which is also fine by me.
Now addressing pxmcc, your point of view is that of me being guilty. That of me not getting consent to capture and release content that I didn't get permission to release. From that foundational standpoint I have no chance at making you think otherwise. Like I said above, the situation between Lola and I simply comes down to who you choose to believe, and you believe Lola, it is what it is.
To say I don't know consent and full disclosure from a hole in the wall is ludacris. If I have a history of not getting full consent prior to releasing content, surely there would be more ladies who'd have came out and voiced concerns similar to Lola's.
But that's not the case because quite frankly, what Lola has reported isn't the norm.
Yes, Lola does have a right to consent to having pics and/or vids posted in her reviews, and without any tats or face pics included, I wholeheartedly agree. And remember, when I was finally made aware that she didn't want her content out, I deleted it without question. It's senseless to assume I wouldn't have taken the same stance 4 years ago had she told me her wishes on the matter, then. She did not.
The notion that I'm this terrible guy is so beyond played out, I continue to see who I want to see, and I continue to make and release consensual content with those respective parties. I've probably contributed more in the last month of February to this board than some would do all year (review wise).
I hope you all here me when I say this,
I truly don't wish to have any problems with anyone in this space at all (again, including you Lola). Same for Anandaman too, but at the same time, if it's war you want, it's war you shall have.
I'll leave you all with this verse from Matthew 7:1
“Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you."
Thank you, and goodbye.
P.S.
If anyone feels the need to comment more negativity after this message, then you truly just need to reevaluate your life.
:laughi ng1: