Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
That is NOT what I said. I said the act of filling the position of judge is a task that falls to every POTUS and is not an accomplishment. A POTUS will obviously try to put judges in place that reflect their either Conservative or Liberal views.
If you are Conservative than the fact that Trump has appointed primarily Conservative judges is an accomplishment. Merely naming a judge is not an accomplishment.
Then why didn’t Onama fill those positions? That the main reason I voted for Trump, to fill the bench and SCOTUS with conservative judges. I thought the was the one thing he could get done. That effects the country long after a President leaves.
Still nothing? You're going have to take a vow of silence.
You're already fully aware of all of Trump's shortcomings as well as I am, but you choose to ignore them. Ignorance is a conscious choice. It is neither my responsibility or desire to attempt to educate the ignorant. In my opinion, it a complete waste of time.
You're on your own.
You're already fully aware of all of Trump's shortcomings as well as I am, but you choose to ignore them. Ignorance is a conscious choice. It is neither my responsibility or desire to attempt to educate the ignorant. In my opinion, it a complete waste of time.
You're on your own.
You're already fully aware of all of Trump's shortcomings as well as I am, but you choose to ignore them. Ignorance is a conscious choice. It is neither my responsibility or desire to attempt to educate the ignorant. In my opinion, it a complete waste of time.
You're on your own.
But you're willing to accept Biden's shortcomings or are you telling us he has none? It may not be a responsibility but trying to educate the ignorant is a noble cause. Forcing one's opinions with punishment and retribution is not a noble cause.
Of course being "educated" especially politically when so many people have no interest in politics and will proudly tell you so and then go vote, demonstrates a lack of intelligence which comes from being un-educated.
Few things more infuriating for a person like myself , than someone who says they are going to vote but can't tell me in specific terms, why they will be voting for that person and yes, I'll accept voting for someone because they aren't so and so, if you can correctly tell me what so and so has done that offends your sensibilities. If one can't, then that is a display of ignorance which as an American, fortunately, one is entitled to.
If you are voting for Biden, you understand his shortcomings and can articulate them and there possible consequences, then you are an educated person who in my opinion is just making a bad choice but I'll respect you as long as you can explain why.
If one tells me they will not vote for Trump and can't tell me why with specifics, I will not respect you.
There are people who actually believe in open borders even when there is practically speaking, no country on earth that doesn't recognize their borders. While the EU has expanded that idea to incorporate a number of countries, the EU still has it's borders and border controls. Any American that can not see the value and necessity of enforcing our borders, is an un-educated fool in my personal opinion.
What I do honestly believe is that more people on the left are concerned with the lives of others than those on the right -- whether it is people of color, the LGBTQ community, the poor, refugees, support for those suffering in other countries, etc.
Uh, didn't you just stereotype those on the right?
While you may not believe in "open borders", what would be the effect of giving every single illegal in this country, not just Dreamers, who I'm inclined to let stay with permanent legal status but not get the right to vote.
Quote:
Who CAN’T Vote?
Non-citizens, including permanent legal residents
The effect would be saying that immigration laws would not be enforced and many of the new breed of Democrats want to do away with ICE which is in effect doing away with border enforcement. No detention centers, no courts to hear asylum requests because if you are on American soil no matter how you got here, you are a citizen that can vote? That's insane.
You can say you are against it but that is the direction the party you are supporting is moving which is why I believe that after 2 years of a Biden Presidency with the House and Senate in Democrat hands, this will be the law of the land and will destroy our economy and will lead to a come back for Republicans.
Unfortunately, the only way for me to be proven right is to allow it to happen.
Even if Biden were to win the election- he's not going to get a Dem controlled House AND Senate. I think Republicans will hang on to the Senate.. and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they manage to flip the House.
Even if Biden were to win the election- he's not going to get a Dem controlled House AND Senate. I think Republicans will hang on to the Senate.. and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they manage to flip the House.
I don't see a scenario where enough people would vote for Biden, yet vote enough GOP down the ballot to make what you posit happen. Plus, too many GOP Senators are in dogfights to keep their seats (Collins, McSally, etc.) versus really only one Democrat Senator is vulnerable (Sen. Doug Jones from AL). I could see the GOP getting back some of the House seats they lost, especially in districts that will vote Trump...but not enough of those sorts of districts exist to flip it back.
Best case scenario for the GOP, unless things change dramatically from right now, is Trump barely winning re-election via the electoral college (but losing the popular vote again), losing only a few Senate seats (but not control of the Senate), and getting some of those "Trump district" House seats back (but not enough to flip the House). Trump would have a hard time getting another constitutionalist-type SCOTUS pick in, as Murkoski and Romney would now be able to hold the process "hostage" due to the slim GOP majority.
Even if Biden were to win the election- he's not going to get a Dem controlled House AND Senate. I think Republicans will hang on to the Senate.. and I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they manage to flip the House.
I agree about the Senate but I think the Dem's keep the House until 2022, after we have seen what they plan to do, they'll lose it.
I said before, as long as Republicans keep the Senate, this far left crap can't get passed. The only thing Biden could do would be by EO and I don't see Biden getting to replace a Conservative judge but I would love to see a long protracted battle if Biden gets to replace Ginsburg. Sure he gets to choose but Republicans could hold him to someone not a complete nut job.
I agree about the Senate but I think the Dem's keep the House until 2022, after we have seen what they plan to do, they'll lose it.
I said before, as long as Republicans keep the Senate, this far left crap can't get passed. The only thing Biden could do would be by EO and I don't see Biden getting to replace a Conservative judge but I would love to see a long protracted battle if Biden gets to replace Ginsburg. Sure he gets to choose but Republicans could hold him to someone not a complete nut job.
