Inquiries and Impeachment of Trump

[oeb11]

+1 - cogent analysis.

And a total waste of a life.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by eccielover

So First off, what does the time of the day of a post have any fucking thing to do with it's content. Are you now the sleep police too. Fucking hilarious.

And the content of the post was very relevant regardless of when it was reported. Nothing in today's news contradicted a thing that was in that post, and nothing you posted in your distraction of it did either. Even the Mueller report said no collusion.

First off, I was wondering if you had a paper route because of your early am posts. Now I’m thinking the stress from das Fuhrer being publicly crucified might be causing some sleepless nights.

Since the date of your article lots of water has flowed under the bridge. Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Cohen, Stone, Pappdoupulos have all been convicted. Piss boy Barr has redacted Mueller’s report and withheld evidence from the investigations.

Today in 2019 all 17 US intelligence agencies and the Senate intelligence committee all agree that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election on trump’s behalf. But trump pushes a conspiracy theory that was originated by Putin of some crowdstrike conspiracy.

Today in 2019 Roger Stone has been convicted of lying to the Mueller investigation, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. All his crimes committed on the behalf of trump.

Today in 2019 a impeachment inquiry into trump’s bribery of a foreign leader to investigate a political opponent to benefit his 2020 campaign.

Just to mention a few facts!

But, but, but a 2016 article is still relevant? Not to me!

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by oeb11

J666 is advancing a new concept in DPST control - "Sleep Police"

Typical insecure DPST compensating for inadequacy!


"Truth and Narrative uber Alles" the DPST motto!

Dude you need new insults you’re very predictable

oeb666 how’s that prayer working out for you is the big man going to shut down the investigation? Inquiring minds want to know.

Gotta go, the impeachment hearings of the fat lying bastard squatting in the Oval Office are about to resume. Have a nice day.

[oeb11]

j666- if you think the adam schiff show is about to change the occupant of the Oval Office, you are due for a great disappointment in your expectations.

When is adam schiff going to provide his "evidence" for public view - what is on is just all about "how did that make you feel" When does the Joe McCarthy act end? Likely Nov 2020.

It is an embarrassment - even to the participating DPST's.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

First off, I was wondering if you had a paper route because of your early am posts. Now I’m thinking the stress from das Fuhrer being publicly crucified might be causing some sleepless nights.

Since the date of your article lots of water has flowed under the bridge. Flynn, Manafort, Gates, Cohen, Stone, Pappdoupulos have all been convicted. Piss boy Barr has redacted Mueller’s report and withheld evidence from the investigations.

Today in 2019 all 17 US intelligence agencies and the Senate intelligence committee all agree that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election on trump’s behalf. But trump pushes a conspiracy theory that was originated by Putin of some crowdstrike conspiracy.

Today in 2019 Roger Stone has been convicted of lying to the Mueller investigation, obstruction of justice and witness tampering. All his crimes committed on the behalf of trump.

Today in 2019 a impeachment inquiry into trump’s bribery of a foreign leader to investigate a political opponent to benefit his 2020 campaign.

Just to mention a few facts!

But, but, but a 2016 article is still relevant? Not to me!

And nothing you just discussed has shown or even comes close to showing that the the election was in any way "materially" effected which is what I highlighted in the article I posted.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Today in 2019 all 17 US intelligence agencies and the Senate intelligence committee all agree that the Russians interfered in the 2016 election on trump’s behalf.

this info is wrong. not fucking 17!!!!

only 3 intel agencies had something to say about the russians. the other 14 agencies were not involved in that aspect.

Just 3... FBI, NSA, and CIA had something to say about the intelligence assessment of the russians.

get your facts right. throwing fake news talking points make you look bad!

you need to stop drinking blue juice.

[Jaxson66]

Judge intends to rule by Monday on House subpoena to Donald McGahn

A federal judge said she intends to rule no later than the end of the day Monday on whether former White House counsel Donald McGahn must testify under subpoena to Congress, after the House Judiciary Committee asked her to accelerate a decision because it aims to call him after the current round of public impeachment hearings finish in December.
U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of Washington entered an order Tuesday about her deadline intent “absent unforeseen circumstances” shortly after a filing from House General Counsel Douglas N. Letter arguing last week’s opening of the hearings before the House Intelligence Committee was grounds for urgency.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...d00_story.html


Looks like a perjury inquiry will be opening very soon

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Judge intends to rule by Monday on House subpoena to Donald McGahn

A federal judge said she intends to rule no later than the end of the day Monday on whether former White House counsel Donald McGahn must testify under subpoena to Congress, after the House Judiciary Committee asked her to accelerate a decision because it aims to call him after the current round of public impeachment hearings finish in December.
U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of Washington entered an order Tuesday about her deadline intent “absent unforeseen circumstances” shortly after a filing from House General Counsel Douglas N. Letter arguing last week’s opening of the hearings before the House Intelligence Committee was grounds for urgency.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local...d00_story.html


Looks like a perjury inquiry will be opening very soon

well if anyone could commit perjury by posting that would be you.


first it was the Mueller nothing burger. now it's the impeachment nothing burger. better watch out! you are gonna starve to death on nothing burgers.


BAHHHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

well if anyone could commit perjury by posting that would be you.


first it was the Mueller nothing burger. now it's the impeachment nothing burger. better watch out! you are gonna starve to death on nothing burgers.


BAHHHAHAHAAAAAAAAA

you know J66 is on veggie burgers. thats fake as you can get it.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

you know J66 is on veggie burgers. thats fake as you can get it.

he eats lentil crackers with guacamole ...

[Jaxson66]

Sondland acknowledges there was a ‘quid pro quo’ involving Ukraine

Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified Wednesday more bluntly than he had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition a White House invite for Ukraine’s new president to their demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump’s political opponents.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d00_story.html

Of course the fat lying bastard did it. The three amigos are about to dump a load on Rudy. Too bad he got in over his head with a life long grifter.

[Chung Tran]

Sondland was at times funny today. I thought Schiff gave a masterful summary at the end of Sondland's testimony.. reasoned, concise and damning.

of course the Right totally disagrees. that Jordan Jackass bolted for the microphones at adjournment, repeating that "Trump said there was no quid pro quo, therefore..."

dumb shit. of course Trump told Sonland that.. the sirens had gone off, he knew the phone call was under investigation.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Sondland acknowledges there was a ‘quid pro quo’ involving Ukraine

Ambassador Gordon Sondland testified Wednesday more bluntly than he had before that President Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, sought to condition a White House invite for Ukraine’s new president to their demands that his country publicly launch investigations that could damage Trump’s political opponents.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d00_story.html

Of course the fat lying bastard did it. The three amigos are about to dump a load on Rudy. Too bad he got in over his head with a life long grifter.

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Sondland was at times funny today. I thought Schiff gave a masterful summary at the end of Sondland's testimony.. reasoned, concise and damning.

of course the Right totally disagrees. that Jordan Jackass bolted for the microphones at adjournment, repeating that "Trump said there was no quid pro quo, therefore..."

dumb shit. of course Trump told Sonland that.. the sirens had gone off, he knew the phone call was under investigation.

so ... the two of you don't believe that the President conducts foreign policy under the Constitution, doesn't have the authority to invoke treaties and should dole out aid to known corrupt nations without conditions or oversight. got it!


BBAHHAHAAAA

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Sondland was at times funny today. I thought Schiff gave a masterful summary at the end of Sondland's testimony.. reasoned, concise and damning.

of course the Right totally disagrees. that Jordan Jackass bolted for the microphones at adjournment, repeating that "Trump said there was no quid pro quo, therefore..."

dumb shit. of course Trump told Sonland that.. the sirens had gone off, he knew the phone call was under investigation.

Yeah, he did crack me up a couple of times.

Schiff is doing a good job of chairing the hearings, I hope Pelosi allows his committee to investigate the perjury and obstruction of justice allegations aimed at self proclaimed stable genius. I have no confidence in Nadler.

[Jaxson66]

Sondland’s testimony advances likely impeachment charge of obstruction

The comments from Sondland, who blamed omissions he made during his closed-door deposition on lack of access to his own records, adds new ammunition to Democrats’ charge that the White House tried to cover up its activities in Ukraine through a campaign of obstruction — potentially paving the way to another article of impeachment against President Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...d00_story.html