Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
I have no idea what evidence they might have or even what they hope to achieve in following through with it ...but the current Russian investigation is why the distraction was needed.
Can any facts be presented in this wiretap story? ...so far I haven't seen any.
I have no idea what evidence they might have or even what they hope to achieve in following through with it ...but the current Russian investigation is why the distraction was needed.
Can any facts be presented in this wiretap story? ...so far I haven't seen any.
1. What "FACTS" have you seen that the Russians "executed" an intentional plan to change the results of the election in favor of Trump?
2. What "FACTS" have you seen that any Senator or Trump administration/campaign official discussed classified information with the Russians and/or even discussed with "the Russians" that sanctions would be adjusted or removed when Trump took over?
3. What WAS the motivation of the Obaminable administration DECLASSIFYING intelligence in December 2016 and "bread crumbing" it around the various agencies to be discovered when Trump was sworn into office?
4. What WAS the motivation for ANYONE to leak the "bread crumbs" to the media beginning in January 2017 and afterwards (still ongoing)?
5. What IS the motivation for the Democrats to intentionally delay the approval of Trump nominiees?
6. What WAS the motivation for the Obaminable Administration TO WIRETAP equipment in Trump Tower in June 2016 and in October 2016?
Since I'm not part of the hacking investigation I have know idea what's going on with it or why it was even needed ...the election is over.
Ok, since you are quick to just dismiss the Russian interference news ...Do you have any evidence to backup this wiretap story? ...currently it only has Trump as the source it seems.
Since I'm not part of the hacking investigation I have know idea what's going on with it or why it was even needed ...the election is over.
Ok, since you are quick to just dismiss the Russian interference news ...Do you have any evidence to backup this wiretap story? ...currently it only has Trump as the source it seems.
that's the same thing a dim congressman told tucker Carlson
Carlson asked him, what evidence is there of any trump campaign collusion with Russians or contacts with Russian operatives?
and all that idiot could say, close to the same idiotic things you've been saying in this thread...since he didn't have any he said, that's why we need an investigation.
Carlson burst out laughing
your level of thoughtful consideration is sorely below par
if you are constantly being falsely accused and having your agenda derailed..why wouldn't you fight back? its not a distraction against the truth , its defending against a lie, its rightful and appropriate...and the idea of Obama constantly misusing the departments of government against americans should make every American shudder
one need only look down through the history of Obama's misuse of government
1. the irs
2. the doj
3. the epa
4. the atf
5. the state dept
6. homeland security
why wouldn't this be true as well given his track record
and there is evidence here....unlike none, zip, zero, nada on the trump campaign russian connection.....the fisa warrants
Ok, since you are quick to just dismiss the Russian interference news ...Do you have any evidence to backup this wiretap story? ...currently it only has Trump as the source it seems.
Of course I don't "have any evidence" ... why would I?
Why would you "have any evidence" of what you just posted?
That's AN ISSUE in all this LEAKING and LYING ... the crap that is being handed over to the media to publicize should have NEVER seen the light of day! So, why was it declassified and disseminated?
As for the wiretapping of Trump Tower last year during the Obaminable administration .... it was LEAKED that a FISA warrant was sought in June 2016 and the application was rejected and a SECOND application was filed in October 2016 and ACCEPTED.
Now, the problem with all these little Anti-Trumpers/Never-Trumpers (besides their whining, blubbering because HillaryNoMore was DEFEATED in a LEGITIMATE ELECTION) is their "enthusiasm" to disrupt the Trump Administration blurs their vision regarding the consequences of LEAKING SHIT ....
.. "one should always be aware of what side of the boat they're on before they throw slop overboard!"
So some knucklehead LEAKS that FISA WARRANTS were sought to monitor the Trump Tower communications!!!!! Purpose?
What was the motivation for LEAKING "that FISA WARRANTS were sought to monitor the Trump Tower communications"?
Hopefully Comey wants the job bad enough to follow up when Sessions gives him the Order~! Lynch is probably having a tough time keeping her diapers clean about now! Not to mention all the little ass-kissing want-a-bes who thought HillaryNoMore would give them cover in 2017!!!!
....
if you are constantly being falsely accused and having your agenda derailed..why wouldn't you fight back? its not a distraction against the truth , its defending against a lie, its rightful and appropriate...and the idea of Obama constantly misusing the departments of government against americans should make every American shudder
It doesn't make me "shudder." It makes me damn glad his pawn HillaryNoMore didn't win! Obaminable always had a tough time keeping his mouth shut .... the last few days has been no exception!
After Berkeley burned he even popped off about protesters going into the streets ... and now they are infesting town hall meetings and making themselves look like the fools they are!!!
Since I'm not part of the hacking investigation I have know idea what's going on with it or why it was even needed ...the election is over.
Ok, since you are quick to just dismiss the Russian interference news ...Do you have any evidence to backup this wiretap story? ...currently it only has Trump as the source it seems.
Here comes your evidence... Lot's of it... please share it with WTFugly, he seems to have the same disability!
The best example of this came from Ben Rhodes, a former senior adviser to President Obama in his role as deputy National Security Advisor, who slammed Trump's accusation, insisting that "No President can order a wiretap. Those restrictions were put in place to protect citizens from people like you." He also said "only a liar" could make the case, as Trump suggested, that Obama wire tapped Trump Tower ahead of the election.
Quote:
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that---
The Odumbo Camp’s Disingenuous Denials on FISA Surveillance of Trump
To summarize, reporting indicates that, prior to June 2016, the Obama Justice Department and FBI considered a criminal investigation of Trump associates, and perhaps Trump himself, based on concerns about connections to Russian financial institutions. Preliminary poking around indicated that there was nothing criminal involved. Rather than shut the case down, though, the Obama Justice Department converted it into a national-security investigation under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). FISA allows the government, if it gets court permission, to conduct electronic surveillance (which could include wiretapping, monitoring of e-mail, and the like) against those it alleges are “agents of a foreign power.” FISA applications and the evidence garnered from them are classified – i.e., we would not know about any of this unless someone had leaked classified information to the media, a felony. In June, the Odumbp Justice Department submitted an application that apparently “named” Trump in addition to some of his associates...
[I]t is unclear whether “named” in this context indicates that Trump himself was cited as a person the Justice Department was alleging was a Russian agent whom it wanted to surveil. It could instead mean that Trump’s name was merely mentioned in an application that sought to conduct surveillance on other alleged Russian agents. President Trump’s tweets on Saturday claimed that “President Odumbo . . . tapp[ed] my phones[,]” which makes it more likely that Trump was targeted for surveillance, rather than merely mentioned in the application....
Not taking no for an answer, the Odumbo Justice Department evidently returned to the FISA court in October 2016, the critical final weeks of the presidential campaign.
I have no idea what evidence they might have or even what they hope to achieve in following through with it ...but the current Russian investigation is why the distraction was needed.
Can any facts be presented in this wiretap story? ...so far I haven't seen any.
