Male Members who do not review

[doug_dfw]

Originally Posted by daaaaaman

Hobbyists write reviews????

FUCK YA!!!!!!!!
SLUTS UNITED!!!!!!!

When are you going to review talent older than who are 35 and older today? You do a wonderful review. Just wondering;would be appreciated by us who have age limits.

Oh, I don't review. I pay cash for the privilege. Just to save you the research.

[nicholas linnear]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

There is no assumption for you to confirm or approve and those two types are totally different, so bad examples on your part.

A provider who treats a hobbyist bad, but that hobbyist does not review her or starts a thread about what he perceives as mistreatment by her and does not name her is a waste of a thread in the fact that the provider may have good reviews or no one has ever heard of her and in order to do a proper info exchange on her, guys need to know who she is to avoid her.

Guys that have not posted a review in over 6 months, yet post multiple times a day on a review board, with the majority of those posts, negative and condescending are pretty clear without naming names. But, most of the names go without saying, all you have to do is look at the guys who have the shit ass and thread hijacking comments to take personal shots at others, look at their post history of the same types of negative remarks and comment on how reviews should be or tell others of their experience with a provider, and yet there are no reviews of that provider by that person, nor are there any recent reviews at all, yet they post multiple times a day, with nothing good to say about anyone or anything, aka a troll. Do you really need names to figure that out?

" Tell others of their experience with that provider,and yet there are no reviews of that provider by that person...."

Hey I'm guilty of that....wtf is wrong with it? I've seen almost fourty girls I never reviewed. ...so what! If that ladies name comes up I exchange info....how is that bad? It seems to me the only way this could be bad is if I promised reviews to those girls or one of the guys was "sponsoring " me and paying for my sessions with the agreement that I'd write reviews! Does anyone else feel this is bad?

[daaaaaman]

Originally Posted by Chung Tran

supposed to.. btw, you need to do a few reviews.. it's pitiful how few you've done in the time you've been active..

I do apologize for this. I haven't even written a review in November but that's because I haven't gotten laid since Monday.

FUCK YA!!!!!!!
SLUTS UNITED!!!!!!!

[sweet.treat69]

I've seen plenty of guys who either have a handle and lurk or just post and do not review.. Mostly P411 guys or someone who absolutely wants to stay UTR. Some of my favorite clients in the business are those types.. Some guys really let this shit get to their head like it makes them the big man on campus smh (no shade to anyone just a trend I notice from time to time)

[nicholas linnear]

^^^Sweet Treat I'd like to let you get to my head^^^

[Guest110416]

This thread has nothing to do with UTR guys that do not or even guys who are frequent posters who do not review much and/or each time they see a provider. What it is about is guys that have not done at least 1 review in over 6 months AND post multiple times daily with those most of their posts being negative, condescending, and taking personal shots at posters on threads from left field, usually hijacking threads steering them towards their well known agendas, many times doing their utmost to bait responses that have nothing to do with the topic of the threads. That is their type of fun on a whore review board. There are even a few posters in this thread who fit that description to a "T".

[869103]

I have been a member of EECIE since 2009 and have a total of 23 posts including this one. I have written 4 reviews and the last was posted in 2010. I have had Lifetime Premium Access since 2010 for the sole porpuse of not having to write reviews. I mainly use the boards for provider ads and keeping up with hobby. Just because some people don't write reviews does not mean they are trollers.

[Guest092216]

Originally Posted by davidfree986

This thread has nothing to do with UTR guys that do not or even guys who are frequent posters who do not review much and/or each time they see a provider. What it is about is guys that have not done at least 1 review in over 6 months AND post multiple times daily with those most of their posts being negative, condescending, and taking personal shots at posters on threads from left field, usually hijacking threads steering them towards their well known agendas, many times doing their utmost to bait responses that have nothing to do with the topic of the threads. That is their type of fun on a whore review board. There are even a few posters in this thread who fit that description to a "T".

One of your many other well known previous handles IS the exact thing you are describing. How are you not able to comprehend this? How can you possibly post this thread with a straight face? Is this your own brand of comedy?

http://eccie.net/member.php?u=209187

750 posts in three months and only 4 reviews.

Dude Stfu. You've graduated to whining about yourself in the third person. And while that may be fascinating to a psychologist it is fucking stupid to everyone else.

[doug_dfw]

[QUOTE=thathottnurse;1057407227]One of your many other well known previous handles IS the exact thing you are describing. How are you not able to comprehend this? How can you possibly post this thread with a straight face? Is this your own brand of comedy?

THN I respect your posts. Your training and experience identifies possibilities untrained cannot.

DF in my mind is not a comedian. Beyond that, I know not.
But I can describe his theories as similar to those of;
Oops oh heck PC or not;
All Liberals who advocate denial of rights of liberty,
Rights of free people, equal
Defending the Republic
Under GOD!