What a bitch...

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

.

Your font is as shrill as your voice.

1. You were caught lying....again. You talked shit about someone needing schooling while screeching Obama voted for a bill he has opposed in every state version
2. You charge people with the crime of infanticide. You either don't know what the term refers to or are one of those smegma eating douche bags who refers to legal abortion as murder.
Either way you are wrong as usual.
3. Since there was already a law on the books that would give medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, you advocate the further waste of tax payer dollars in much the same way you split hairs. To great waste and no discernable amount of relevant information or effect on the outcome.

You're only 5' 7", aren't you?

[CuteOldGuy]

Munchie, are you saying Obama opposed that bill because it wasted taxpayer money? LOL! When has he EVER been opposed to wasting taxpayer money?



The only reason left is that he supports a woman's right to choose, even after the child is born alive.

Someday you are going to have face reality.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Your font is as shrill as your voice.

1. You were caught lying....again. You talked shit about someone needing schooling while screeching Obama voted for a bill he has opposed in every state version
2. You charge people with the crime of infanticide. You either don't know what the term refers to or are one of those smegma eating douche bags who refers to legal abortion as murder.
Either way you are wrong as usual.
3. Since there was already a law on the books that would give medical care to a baby who survived an abortion, you advocate the further waste of tax payer dollars in much the same way you split hairs. To great waste and no discernable amount of relevant information or effect on the outcome.

You're only 5' 7", aren't you?

The essence of the original post was correct -- Odumbo voted against a bill that would protect the life of infants surviving an abortion; hence, Odumbo's vote was FOR infanticide. Nothing you say can change that fact. Hence, you are the liar.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Munchie, are you saying Obama opposed that bill because it wasted taxpayer money? LOL! When has he EVER been opposed to wasting taxpayer money?



The only reason left is that he supports a woman's right to choose, even after the child is born alive.

Someday you are going to have face reality.

How do you always miss the point. The point is that if there is a law on the books, why revisit the subject? If you would ever read anything other than your wack sites, you would see Obama's reasons for voting the way he did. I don't speak for him. He be douching advocates revisiting the issue. I say he is for wasting tax payer money.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The essence of the original post was correct: Odumbo's vote was FOR infanticide; nothing you say can change that fact. Hence, you are the liar.

Once you see the word "essence", you know you have won. A poor attempt at saying "what I really meant was".

Once again, you saying something doesn't make it true. No matter how long you hold your breath, stomp your feet, or squeal like a little girl who just busted her cherry on the monkey bars.

Using the word "infanticide" is your choice, not the law's.
You continually choose to be wrong. I don't have to say anything to change a fact that isn't a fact.
You know, just another moot point by you.

PS Isn't this funny. None of your butt boys comes to your defense or sends you a PM telling you to drop it

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

How do you always miss the point. The point is that if there is a law on the books, why revisit the subject? If you would ever read anything other than your wack sites, you would see Obama's reasons for voting the way he did. I don't speak for him. He be douching advocates revisiting the issue. I say he is for wasting tax payer money.


Once you see the word "essence", you know you have won. A poor attempt at saying "what I really meant was".

Once again, you saying something doesn't make it true. No matter how long you hold your breath, stomp your feet, or squeal like a little girl who just busted her cherry on the monkey bars.

Using the word "infanticide" is your choice, not the law's.
You continually choose to be wrong. I don't have to say anything to change a fact that isn't a fact.
You know, just another moot point by you.

PS Isn't this funny. None of your butt boys comes to your defense or sends you a PM telling you to drop it

This is Illinois Bill SB 1082:

LRB093 10540 MKM 10794 b 1 AN ACT concerning infants who are born alive. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 5. The Statute on Statutes is amended by adding 5 Section 1.36 as follows: 6 (5 ILCS 70/1.36 new) 7 Sec. 1.36. Born-alive infant. 8 (a) In determining the meaning of any statute or of any 9 rule, regulation, or interpretation of the various 10 administrative agencies of this State, the words "person", 11 "human being", "child", and "individual" include every infant 12 member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any 13 stage of development. 14 (b) As used in this Section, the term "born alive", with 15 respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the 16 complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of that 17 member, at any stage of development, who after that expulsion 18 or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of 19 the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary 20 muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been 21 cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction 22 occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean 23 section, or induced abortion. 24 (c) A live child born as a result of an abortion shall 25 be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate 26 protection under the law.27 Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon 28 becoming law.

You have repeatedly failed to refute the fact that Odumbo hypocritically voted against this bill which met every precondition he had previously set. He voted against protecting the life of a 'living' infant; in essence, he voted to allow the death of such an infant and that is 'infanticide' wherein death overtakes the infant due to want of care, e.g., food, drink, exposure, etc.

You are the only one in this forum with butt-buddies.

[AdventureAdams]

Does anyone have a summary?

[JD Barleycorn]

COG please give up on this point. It is obvious that Munchie has suffered brain damage at some point in his life (probably survived an abortion) and just looks for trouble. Facts mean nothing to him and don't bother to ask him to think. I understand that thinking makes his rectum bleed.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This is Illinois Bill SB 1082:

LRB093 10540 MKM 10794 b 1 AN ACT concerning infants who are born alive. 2 Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois, 3 represented in the General Assembly: 4 Section 5. The Statute on Statutes is amended by adding 5 Section 1.36 as follows: 6 (5 ILCS 70/1.36 new) 7 Sec. 1.36. Born-alive infant. 8 (a) In determining the meaning of any statute or of any 9 rule, regulation, or interpretation of the various 10 administrative agencies of this State, the words "person", 11 "human being", "child", and "individual" include every infant 12 member of the species homo sapiens who is born alive at any 13 stage of development. 14 (b) As used in this Section, the term "born alive", with 15 respect to a member of the species homo sapiens, means the 16 complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of that 17 member, at any stage of development, who after that expulsion 18 or extraction breathes or has a beating heart, pulsation of 19 the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary 20 muscles, regardless of whether the umbilical cord has been 21 cut and regardless of whether the expulsion or extraction 22 occurs as a result of natural or induced labor, cesarean 23 section, or induced abortion. 24 (c) A live child born as a result of an abortion shall 25 be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate 26 protection under the law.27 Section 99. Effective date. This Act takes effect upon 28 becoming law.

You have repeatedly failed to refute the fact that Odumbo hypocritically voted against this bill which met every precondition he had previously set. He voted against protecting the life of a 'living' infant; in essence, he voted to allow the death of such an infant and that is 'infanticide' wherein death overtakes the infant due to want of care, e.g., food, drink, exposure, etc.

You are the only one in this forum with butt-buddies.

First off asshole, the bold section in your post covers a section of an earlier post of mine. It was in the part you said was irrelevant (post 105). Also as I stated, the new bill said nothing about viability. Here is part of that post.

“Illinois already had a law on its books from 1975 that said if a doctor suspected an abortion was scheduled for a viable fetus — meaning able to survive outside of the mother's body — then the child must receive medical care if it survives the abortion. The new laws didn't distinguish between viable and nonviable, meaning that an infant of any age that survived an abortion should receive care.” Whether it be 18 weeks or 32. And of course we should waste our resources on a 18 week old fetus.

Second, fuck you and your failure to refute. Another word you don't know the meaning of. I assume that is the case by the lack of your own refutes.

There are a lot of things I haven't said about this subject. Just like there are a lot of things you haven't said about it. The Politifact link I included earlier covers the "essence" of this subject. From the beginning you have gone from Obama voting for, to the essence of, to misusing the term “infanticide”, etc. You change your statement in each post. You just want to be right.
Argue with Politifact, not me.

You’ve been schooled. Deal with it.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

COG please give up on this point. It is obvious that Munchie has suffered brain damage at some point in his life (probably survived an abortion) and just looks for trouble. Facts mean nothing to him and don't bother to ask him to think. I understand that thinking makes his rectum bleed.

I'm sure cog can appreciate that comeback. If you ever post some facts, I'll let you know what they mean to me.

When this is all you have to say, another fringe member of the pack has rolled over on his back and offered his throat.

I'm keeping you alive so I can fuck with you. You're really not worth more than that.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

First off asshole, the bold section in your post covers a section of an earlier post of mine. It was in the part you said was irrelevant (post 105). Also as I stated, the new bill said nothing about viability. Here is part of that post.

“Illinois already had a law on its books from 1975 that said if a doctor suspected an abortion was scheduled for a viable fetus — meaning able to survive outside of the mother's body — then the child must receive medical care if it survives the abortion. The new laws didn't distinguish between viable and nonviable, meaning that an infant of any age that survived an abortion should receive care.” Whether it be 18 weeks or 32. And of course we should waste our resources on a 18 week old fetus.

Second, fuck you and your failure to refute. Another word you don't know the meaning of. I assume that is the case by the lack of your own refutes.

There are a lot of things I haven't said about this subject. Just like there are a lot of things you haven't said about it. The Politifact link I included earlier covers the "essence" of this subject. From the beginning you have gone from Obama voting for, to the essence of, to misusing the term “infanticide”, etc. You change your statement in each post. You just want to be right.
Argue with Politifact, not me.

You’ve been schooled. Deal with it.

Odumbo voted against a bill that would have prevented 'infanticide'; in essence, he voted for 'infanticide'.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbo voted against a bill that would have prevented 'infanticide'; in essence, he voted for 'infanticide'.

What ever you say, chief.

[Guest123018-4]

Liberalism like homosexuality is a birth defect.
I do not mean to imply that some people cannot turn queer, I am sure there are some that do, but most are born that way.
Liberals by choice have some hope, it is the defective ones that you just cant fix, you know like queers.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I don't speak for him. He be douching advocates revisiting the issue. I say he is for wasting tax payer money.

Is this another language, or are you suffering from Tourette's now, too? Geez, man, get some help!

[cptjohnstone]

we were talking about a foul ball???

[JD Barleycorn]

Hey Munchie, better slap a pad on your ass, it's starting to spot your shorts dearie.