If you're an American, this should make you angry

[Whirlaway]

---

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Why don't you include the entire section of that part of the speech instead of just one part. He didn't empower and embolden anyone by what he said....


"It is time to leave the call of violence and the politics of division behind. On so many issues, we face a choice between the promise of the future, or the prisons of the past. And we cannot afford to get it wrong. We must seize this moment. And America stands ready to work with all who are willing to embrace a better future.

The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt — it must be claimed by those in Tahrir Square who chanted, "Muslims, Christians, we are one." The future must not belong to those who bully women — it must be shaped by girls who go to school, and those who stand for a world where our daughters can live their dreams just like our sons.

The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources — it must be won by the students and entrepreneurs, the workers and business owners who seek a broader prosperity for all people. Those are the women and men that America stands with; theirs is the vision we will support.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. But to be credible, those who condemn that slander must also condemn the hate we see in the images of Jesus Christ that are desecrated, or churches that are destroyed, or the Holocaust that is denied.

Let us condemn incitement against Sufi Muslims and Shiite pilgrims. It's time to heed the words of Gandhi: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit." Together, we must work towards a world where we are strengthened by our differences, and not defined by them. That is what America embodies, that's the vision we will support."

Gee thanks, undercunt. It sounds much better when you put it in context.... now answer me this: How is that "leave the call of violence behind" thingie going for you? It's been over 2-1/2 years since Odumbo's UN speech. Is the Middle East more peaceful today? Is it infused with the example of Gandhi because our POTUS pontificated for a more tolerant world? Show me where our preachiness has reaped positive results. In Libya? Syria? Iraq? Yemen? Iran? Egypt? Ok, I'll give you Egypt - the al-Sisi regime is now ensuring the "future must not belong to those who would target Coptic Christians" there. Oh wait, I can't give you credit for Egypt. Odumbo supported the prior Muslim Brotherhood government, didn't he? Sorry about that.

This is what we get when we let preachy, disengaged, delusional libtard Democrats run our foreign policy. Nothing but feel-good speeches to let the libtard base at home wallow in their sense of moral superiority while the entire Middle East goes up in flames!


.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Gee thanks, undercunt. It sounds much better when you put it in context.... now answer me this: How is that "leave the call of violence behind" thingie going for you? It's been over 2-1/2 years since Odumbo's UN speech. Is the Middle East more peaceful today? Is it infused with the example of Gandhi because our POTUS pontificated for a more tolerant world? Show me where our preachiness has reaped positive results. In Libya? Syria? Iraq? Yemen? Iran? Egypt? Ok, I'll give you Egypt - the al-Sisi regime is now ensuring the "future must not belong to those who would target Coptic Christians" there. Oh wait, I can't give you credit for Egypt. Odumbo supported the prior Muslim Brotherhood government, didn't he? Sorry about that.

This is what we get when we let preachy, disengaged, delusional libtard Democrats run our foreign policy. Nothing but feel-good speeches to let the libtard base at home wallow in their sense of moral superiority while the entire Middle East goes up in flames!


.

Did you ever stop and think that maybe it's the Middle East that should be responsible for the Middle East and what goes on over there? We've been meddling in their affairs since we discovered oil in Saudi Arabia, before even, and it's led to nothing but disaster for them. We've made the region more unstable and then people like you have the audacity to act like they don't know how we arrived at this point.

Shouldn't we desire to reach a point where violence isn't the answer to our problems? You decry his peaceful speech. Why? Should we quit trying because it's hard?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

In a CBS interview on 12 September, Odumbo admitted that he did not call the attack on Benghazi "an act of terror" in his Rose Garden speech on September 12, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. In subsequent days Odumbo fallaciously attributed the incident in Benghazi to a video tape, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. The DIA delivered a report to Hildabeast on 12 September stating that the attack in Benghazi was not prompted by the video tape, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas. Assuredly, Odumbo was given the same intel, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

They had no idea on the day after it that was even true. It kills me how you fail to grasp the fluidity of a situation like Benghazi. Information changes. Things we thought were true are proven wrong. Things we hadn't thought of are now possibilities. You're just so fucking stunted.

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't give a goddamn what he said to Kroft. I care about what actually came out of his mouth.

I find this to be one of the funniest post I have ever seen

WombRaider, I googled your handle, are you really a big pussy?

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

I find this to be one of the funniest post I have ever seen

WombRaider, I googled your handle, are you really a big pussy?

I yam what I eat.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

I don't give a goddamn what he said to Kroft. I care about what actually came out of his mouth.

Originally Posted by cptjohnstone

I find this to be one of the funniest posts I have ever seen.

He is saying most of the time Odumbo speaks out of his ass, not his mouth. I think this undercunt post is even funnier:

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're illiteracy is rearing its ugly head again.

[cptjohnstone]

Originally Posted by lustylad

He is saying most of the time Odumbo speaks out of his ass, not his mouth. I think this undercunt post is even funnier:

sounds like something Eva would write, if he could

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

They had no idea on the day after it that was even true. It kills me how you fail to grasp the fluidity of a situation like Benghazi. Information changes. Things we thought were true are proven wrong. Things we hadn't thought of are now possibilities. You're just so fucking stunted.

CIA agents on the ground in Libya stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

The DIA stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Libyan officials stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Hildabeast's friend (and informal confidant) stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Yet, Odumbo, Hildabeast, et al, ignored the obvious and blamed it on a video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

The only information that actually changed was stipulated in the Rhodes memo on how best to spin a lie in an election cycle, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

CIA agents on the ground in Libya stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

The DIA stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Libyan officials stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Hildabeast's friend (and informal confidant) stated that it was a terrorist attack, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Yet, Odumbo, Hildabeast, et al, ignored the obvious and blamed it on a video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

The only information that actually changed was stipulated in the Rhodes memo on how best to spin a lie in an election cycle, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

Is it possible, in your tiny mind, that it was a terrorist attack came to fruition BECAUSE of the video? No one is denying that the attack was carried out by terrorists, you fucking imbecile.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

He is saying most of the time Odumbo speaks out of his ass, not his mouth. I think this undercunt post is even funnier:

I'll give you a dollar for every grammatical error you find in my posts. You won't be able to buy a coffee at Starbucks by the time you finish.

(That should keep the little shit busy for awhile)

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Is it possible, in your tiny mind, that it was a terrorist attack came to fruition BECAUSE of the video? No one is denying that the attack was carried out by terrorists, you fucking imbecile.

Odumbo, Hildabeast, et al, denied it was a terrorist attack when they blamed it on a happenstance mob reacting to a video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbo, Hildabeast, et al, denied it was a terrorist attack when they blamed it on a happenstance mob reacting to a video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

You are incorrect. Both 'terrorist' and 'attack' are in this sentence.

Sept 18

extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the one, the consulate in Libya.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You are incorrect. Both 'terrorist' and 'attack' are in this sentence.

Sept 18

extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies, including the one, the consulate in Libya.

You and Odumbo are the liars, because the terrorist attack was planned ten days prior to the event and the attack was not predicated on the video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You and Odumbo are the liars, because the terrorist attack was planned ten days prior to the event and the attack was not predicated on the video, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

You don't know that. The video was uploaded in July 2012, months before the attack in September. It's conceivable that it angered muslims and they in turn planned an attack.