Hobby discretion....does it matter??

[Jewish Lawyer]

Originally Posted by TheOriginalDannie

You said it best: "It’s amazing how forgiving men can be about a woman’s lack of erudition, if she is exceptionally pretty."
You are the one who was just talking about her brilliance. Care to repeat?

1. I would never compare myself to Tara because there is no comparison. She's waaaaay better than I could ever hope to be. Three years younger and just stunning, inside and out.
That's why I've maintained myself as I have, with zero the bannings she has dealt with, due to an inability to control her PM harassment and a plethora of other "issues" including multiple handles during that time. She rocks!

Instead, she now gives out free pussy in exchange for WK's like you. But honestly, I had no clue SP Hunter was Jewish.

Again, no comparison. YOU asked about my IQ which you seem to be fascinated with.

2. Yes, string theory deals with yo-yo's.

3. Did you ever answer my OP?? You are just another minion who rushes to the cause, trying to save your damsel in distress. For the fucking umpteenth time, this is NOT a Tara thread. For fuck's sake, why does everything go back to Tara?! What the fuck is wrong with you people?!

4. The little head really does all the thinking, doesn't it?

I would put a little more thought and consideration into your opinions, had we ever met. Since that is not the case, and you have obvious favoritism and have been blatantly and openly biased for quite some time, what is your purpose here? Like I said before, address my post or move along, no matter what the pussy compels (or bribes) you to do.

THIS IS NOT ABOUT ANY ONE PARTICULAR PROVIDER. CAN YOU PLEASE ANSWER THE QUESTIONS I POSED, AND QUIT MAKING EVERYTHING INTO SOMETHING IT NEVER WAS?!
Thank you.

- A 'touchy' Dannie

Yes, hobby discretion matters to me. I have received it from every provider I have been with.
The fact of the matter is, with the things I post, I'm afraid me being either a poster or a reviewer might be bad for a lady, so I ask her if she wants a post. If BBW Katrina ever relents, I will honor her request to keep silent if she wants me to do so.
I would not accept a discount from any provider in return for my postings, nor has any ever been offered to me for a posting or review on a girl I have actually ever met.
Tara doesn't charge enough for the pleasure of being with her. Very few guys would be able to be with such a beautiful girl in most situations. I think deep down having to pay induces jealousy, and a sense of inadequacy. That manifests itself in hating and stalking for some.
Sticking to the OP's point, I wonder if my lack of discretion concerning Tara's excellent BCD skills is a problem. Is it wrong to describe the sexual activities, including a threesome, that I experienced with her? I really never thought to ask her, so I will and attempt to further contribute to the topic.

[Matador]

Originally Posted by pyramider

I was simply replying to two posts. One about the sig line. The other about IQs. So yes post 88 was on topic responding to prior posts.

The Original poster determines what the topic is. If you reply to a hijack, you are not on topic. This is not up for debate and it is the final warning.

This is a good topic that needs a refresher every so often even for veteran members. People in general can become too complacent and relaxed about certain things. Please post on topic or skip the thread.

[Guest071613-2]

Originally Posted by Jewish Lawyer

Sticking to the OP's point, I wonder if my lack of discretion concerning Tara's excellent BCD skills is a problem. Is it wrong to describe the sexual activities, including a threesome, that I experienced with her? I really never thought to ask her, so I will and attempt to further contribute to the topic.

That was NOT my point; your reading comprehension is at an all-time low.

The purpose of this site is for men to review and discuss ladies.

It would make sense for you to review a threesome with her, as I am very certain she asked for one. 99.999999% positive.

If you can read, what I asked was, how do the GENTS feel about your trysts being outted via board posts when you have not mentioned it.

Start your own thread if you want to know if it was OK to review Tara without her permission. That's not what my thread is about and I would appreciate it if you would quit derailing it.

Originally Posted by Matador

The Original poster determines what the topic is. If you reply to a hijack, you are not on topic. This is not up for debate and it is the final warning.

This is a good topic that needs a refresher every so often even for veteran members. People in general can become too complacent and relaxed about certain things. Please post on topic or skip the thread.

Jewish Lawyer, please read this quote a few times. Then, rinse and repeat.

[Jewish Lawyer]

OK, sorry. The answer is, if Tara (or any other girl I've fucked, gotten a blow job from, or participated in a threesome with, etc) reviewed my activities prior to me reviewing her or mentioning her, I would consider it a mild irritant. She has never done that, though, nor have any of the others.
The biggest problem I have with lack of discretion is definitely naming a time and place. That could create problems. However, it would need to happen several times to establish a pattern to create suspicion.

[addict]

All this shit about keeping things on track sucks the fun out of it. If it was solely about the OP, this thread should be two posts long: Dannie's, followed by an emphatic "Yes, discretion is important."


Which is to say, we all know discretion is important in the hobby. The purpose of this thread is to subtly call those out who don't practice it, as well as letting them dig their own graves as they try and defend their disregarding of it. I'm not quite sure how Tara got involved, but I rarely am. It's like a magic trick.

[Lucas McCain]

Originally Posted by TheOriginalDannie

That was NOT my point; your reading comprehension is at an all-time low.

The purpose of this site is for men to review and discuss ladies.

It would make sense for you to review a threesome with her, as I am very certain she asked for one. 99.999999% positive.

If you can read, what I asked was, how do the GENTS feel about your trysts being outted via board posts when you have not mentioned it.

Start your own thread if you want to know if it was OK to review Tara without her permission. That's not what my thread is about and I would appreciate it if you would quit derailing it.




Jewish Lawyer, please read this quote a few times. Then, rinse and repeat.

Well, that's typical Tara WK shit from Jewish Lawyer, just what you would expect. Always the same group of clowns that fall over themselves trying to defend her that they forget what the fuck that the topic of the thread is even about.

NOW BACK ON TRACK, I found this thread to be very interesting. I think a lot of people have very valid points and some really odd ones. I saw that Miss Priss has zero reviews, yet mentions that someone has seen her for whatever reason - I don't get that. I am assuming she has a no review policy and is not even a verified provider here, so why mention a dude you've seen here other than to start shit?

Anyway, I digress. I'm kind of a weird guy. The chest pounding and I did this and that to this girl here is kind of weird to me. The "you the man" comments in reviews are even more ridiculous to me....I may be old school, but the, "you the man" comments to me is what I would get or I would give to a friend after picking up a cutie from the bar and going home with her. Not for stopping by an ATM with a girl he fucked with 100 reviews.

In closing, maybe people need to shut the fuck up a little more. I think in this day and age with facebook, twitter and other social media, it's hard for people, (both men and women) to not just blurt out whatever they want people to know, while giving little thought to discretion.

And for all of you guys about to ask the same question as I ask myself, "Why are you here?" Good question, I guess I'm just bored like the rest of you guys and need to get a more exciting life.

[Gonzo DFW]

I routinely tell any provider I'm trying to schedule with that she can call any of the ladies I've reviewed. But other than that the only times I mention services or performance is in reviews or when a hobbyists PMs and asks me. And yes, Dannie is fucking beautiful! Or is that indiscreet?

[pyramider]

Discretion, and not wanting to hurt a lady's business, is a reason I do not write many reviews, plus I am lazier than the normal fucktard.

Let the thread go thru the natural ebbs and flows that all threads go thru. Just ride the waves. Shaka

[Jules Jaguar]

Clients do it too! I do not care to know where betty's incall is or if bertha does BB or Brenda is strung out on forbidden substances or that briana has a pimp.

If they are telling me all of this (some very personal) info about other providers, I can not help but to wonder what they are telling them about me or where my incall is.

Discretion where has it gone?

[TinMan]

Very true, Jules. It has become apparent in recent years that guys are just as guilty of this as women...perhaps even more so.

[Jules Jaguar]

The crazy part is that all of the info is volunteered, It's not like I am asking or even bringing these ladies up. I just try to change the subject, but it is disturbing that it even happens in the first place.

[TinMan]

Gossip has always been part of the scene, so what you're talking about, Jules, is nothing new. The disturbing trend (to me at least) is the way that much of this gossip has spilled over to the public boards.

[guest043013-2]

Originally Posted by TheOriginalDannie

I know I have never been on your good "list", but I have always respected your posts and I feel you have a plethora of good information and opinions. Even if you don't like me, I respect you tremendously. I like people who tell it like it is, even if it's not in my favor....

Hopefully this is not too much of getting offtrack, but Dannie, I have always respected you as well.

And much of that respect is based on the fact that you do understand discretion. It is very hard for a lot of people to "get it" with regards to discretion, and the fact that the sole reason none of us here use our real names is because we don't want our real lives and hobby lives to cross paths.

I could explain a few other issues, but it would require me to be indiscrete. At this moment, for instance, I am involved in a PM exchange with a young lady because one of her showcase pics links directly to her facebook page. She did seem a bit concerned when I asked her if calling her by her real name would upset her.

I think we forget that websites, be it ECCIE or Facebook, have a large public exposure that could create problems for us now or in the future. Walking the line between exposing enough about us to get screened, to market our services, or to just try to have some fun can be quite a tightrope.

[Kayleehotchick]

I think discretion is a MUST in this business and it disturbs me to see the how many people like to talk about the personal business of others on here.

Great topic btw..

And great job turning this into another "Tara is a *itch" thread. I love it! I hope her phone is ringing off the hook.

[RickO'shayRabbitt]

Originally Posted by TheOriginalDannie

See my comments in red

My IQ comment wasn't meant to be directed towards your posts. There were others. But then again, I should know by now that nuance is rarely picked up on a message board. And I do get the irony that I have posted my own reviews.