Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
649 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Jon Bon |
397 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
281 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
266 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70804 | biomed1 | 63414 | Yssup Rider | 61090 | gman44 | 53297 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48726 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 42918 | The_Waco_Kid | 37241 | CryptKicker | 37224 | Mokoa | 36496 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
04-09-2015, 02:05 AM
|
#91
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Since Reagan was never prosecuted or indicted, I think he got away with it and no crime was committed. The rest is just bellyaching. It was Congress who crossed the line by passing the Bolan amendment that interfered with the authority of the president to supply money to the Contras. Foreign policy is not part of the responsibilities of the Congress. Reagan found a way to sell obsolete weapons (that Iran had already paid for once) to Iran and got two things (that is how you negotiate); money for the Contras and the release of some hostages.
What Obama did flies in the face of common sense and shows that a keeper should be appointed to look after this man-child until he leaves office. Lincoln, whom Obama claims to admire, stopped trading prisoners with the Confederacy because the officers just returned to the battlefield to fight again.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 02:16 AM
|
#92
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Since Reagan was never prosecuted or indicted, I think he got away with it and no crime was committed. The rest is just bellyaching. It was Congress who crossed the line by passing the Bolan amendment that interfered with the authority of the president to supply money to the Contras. Foreign policy is not part of the responsibilities of the Congress. Reagan found a way to sell obsolete weapons (that Iran had already paid for once) to Iran and got two things (that is how you negotiate); money for the Contras and the release of some hostages.
What Obama did flies in the face of common sense and shows that a keeper should be appointed to look after this man-child until he leaves office. Lincoln, whom Obama claims to admire, stopped trading prisoners with the Confederacy because the officers just returned to the battlefield to fight again.
|
So then you disagree with Sen Cotton and his band of 46?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 03:31 AM
|
#93
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
So then you disagree with Sen Cotton and his band of 46?
|
Look, we know you're too stupid to understand the complexities of life but what Cotton did was to inform Iran how things worked. The Bolan amendment was an attempt to control foreign policy.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 04:10 AM
|
#94
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK
I think President Obama made the best deal we can get with Iran.
It will stop them from stockpiling more weapons grade material, lower the number of centrifuges, and allow international inspections.
We now have a pathway to monitor what they are doing, and have positively influenced the chance for peace in the Middle East.
The Iranians appear to be happy with it and have committed to not developing nuclear weapons. This is an example of good high level diplomacy by his administration, and I think we should all support his efforts on the international stage.
|
I saw a clip of Bill Clinton saying about the same thing when he was POTUS.
That clip was about North Korea.
|
|
Quote
| 2 users liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 05:45 AM
|
#95
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I saw a clip of Bill Clinton saying about the same thing when he was POTUS.
That clip was about North Korea.
|
But who could have predicted that little fat guy who loves Dennis Rodman would come along?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 07:26 AM
|
#96
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DSK
But who could have predicted that little fat guy who loves Dennis Rodman would come along?
|
How about if the "little fat girl" comes along?
"He who giveth can taketh away."
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 07:34 AM
|
#97
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I saw a clip of Bill Clinton saying about the same thing when he was POTUS.
That clip was about North Korea.
|
I suppose it is only natural that LLIdiot would have an obsession with all things Obama and Clinton.
After all, he once claimed to be a Democrat!
Yeah right, a Democrat of the Strom Thurmond variety!
Once a Klanner, errr Clanner ..... Always a Klanner, errr Clanner.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 07:50 AM
|
#98
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
....an obsession with all things Obama and Clinton.
After all, he once claimed to be a Democrat!
|
You can have their wives, too.
I do realize the Clintons are running low on funds and need to get back on the government tit where they can hustle some more money for their endowment/slush fund ..... even though the country does need a breather from the know nothing you help get elected again.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 07:56 AM
|
#99
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
You can have their wives, too.
|
You have my permission to "carry on."
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 11:28 AM
|
#100
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 16, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 51,038
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
You have my permission to "carry on."
|
Are you "concerned" they would turn you down? A "reasonable" concern!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 01:10 PM
|
#101
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 23, 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 15,047
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Are you "concerned" they would turn you down? A "reasonable" concern!
|
Turned down? What did I apply for?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 08:04 PM
|
#102
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WombRaider
So then you disagree with Sen Cotton and his band of 46?
|
Nope, we just figured that if getting involved with and blocking a President's foreign policy actions was OK when Dems did it to Reagan, then, it must be okay for Republicans to do decades later. Or are there special rules that say Democrats can do something that Republicans are then not allowed to do??
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 08:12 PM
|
#103
|
Oral Aficionado
Join Date: Feb 13, 2013
Location: SW Oklahoma
Posts: 8,522
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigtex
I suppose it is only natural that LLI
Yeah right, a Democrat of the Strom Thurmond variety!
Once a Klanner, errr Clanner ..... Always a Klanner, errr Clanner.
|
You mean like that other Democrat stalwart Senator Robert Byrd?? Once a Klanner, errr Clanner....Always a Klanner, errr Clanner???
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 09:25 PM
|
#104
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Dec 30, 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 8,050
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLeg505
You mean like that other Democrat stalwart Senator Robert Byrd?? Once a Klanner, errr Clanner....Always a Klanner, errr Clanner???
|
You nailed him!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
04-09-2015, 10:15 PM
|
#105
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Apr 7, 2015
Location: Down by the River
Posts: 8,487
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Look, we know you're too stupid to understand the complexities of life but what Cotton did was to inform Iran how things worked. The Bolan amendment was an attempt to control foreign policy.
|
You do what seems to be your thing, you don't answer anything. You said in your post, and I even highlighted it for you, that foreign policy was not the purview of congress. Those were YOUR words. I then asked, politely I might add, if you disagreed with Sen Cotton and his 46 cohorts, since they took it upon themselves to sabotage negotiations. Iran doesn't need to be informed by some dipshit senator how our government works. Half of them were educated here.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|