Obama’s policy strategy: Ignore laws

[CuteOldGuy]

I already admitted this in another thread, but it still makes me ill. The edited FOX version distorts what the President said. It is very unprofessional of FOX, and they did it to support their bias. This is no different than MSNBC editing Romney's remarks, and is just as unacceptable.

*cough, cough* Uh,

Doofie was right.

Dammit! Now I need another shower.

[Randy4Candy]

Just popped in to make sure that the fascist, right-whang, TPunk'n, drooling, mouth-breathers were still at it. Yep, they are. Such a shortage of intelligence as demonstrated by their one-note variations on the "when did you stop beating your wife" theme.

[Laz]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

If Obama had changed the enforcement policy quietly as you suggest, he would have lost the political advantage of pandering to Mexican-Americans. Obama realizes that this type of high profile change in policy encourages additional illegal immigration; that's what he wants. Illegal immigrants usually become new Democrat voters.

He was elected to do the right thing not get a political advantage to get votes. If his policies were effective he would not need to pander to various groups in an effort to get votes.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by Laz

He was elected to do the right thing not get a political advantage to get votes. If his policies were effective he would not need to pander to various groups in an effort to get votes.

You're absolutely right. I certainly don't approve of his shameless violation of the Constitution to increase the likelyhood of his re-election. This guy should be impeached.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Doove

The only difference is in semantics. So if that qualifies as "a big difference", then oh well.



Notice my dumb ass did no such thing. Your quote came from the video i linked to in post #81.

So suck it.

Your dumb ass is wrong, Doofus. The video is from March 2011 where Odumbo said: “There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as president.”

The Politico article is dated September 2011, where Odumbo said:

“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true,” Obama told Hispanic journalists at an “Open for Questions” White House roundtable. “The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books I have to enforce.”

And your dumb ass is still ignoring Articles I and II of the Constitution!

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

Just popped in to make sure that the fascist, right-whang, TPunk'n, drooling, mouth-breathers were still at it. Yep, they are. Such a shortage of intelligence as demonstrated by their one-note variations on the "when did you stop beating your wife" theme.

BTW, Randy4Andy, you're still a dumb ass too.

[Randy4Candy]

IBH, shut your mouth when you breathe. You're givng the gheys erections.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Randy4Candy

IBH, shut your mouth when you breathe. You're givng the gheys erections.

Randy4Andy, once again you've demonstrated how you are a dumb ass.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

You're absolutely right. I certainly don't approve of his shameless violation of the Constitution to increase the likelyhood of his re-election. This guy should be impeached.

unconstitutional executive orders on immigration like Reagan, Bush41, Clinton, and Bush 43

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by CJ7

unconstitutional executive orders on immigration like Reagan, Bush41, Clinton, and Bush 43

You're going to have to be specific. Otherwise, I have to assume you're just bull shitting as usual.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

You're going to have to be specific. Otherwise, I have to assume you're just bull shitting as usual.

sheesh ... are you specific challenged or what?

ok, I'll go s ..... l ..... o ..... w

Reagan
Bush41
Clinton
Bush43


all used executive orders for immigration purposes.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by CJ7

sheesh ... are you specific challenged or what?

ok, I'll go s ..... l ..... o ..... w

Reagan
Bush41
Clinton
Bush43


all used executive orders for immigration purposes.

What say you quit with the lip-service and cite proof. Your 'words' and 'accusations' mean jack-shit, CBJ7.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your dumb ass is wrong, Doofus.

Sorry, but no.

The video is from March 2011 where Odumbo said: “There are enough laws on the books by Congress that are very clear in terms of how we have to enforce our immigration system that for me to simply, through executive order, ignore those congressional mandates would not conform with my appropriate role as president.”

The Politico article is dated September 2011, where Odumbo said:

“This notion that somehow I can just change the laws unilaterally is not true,” Obama told Hispanic journalists at an “Open for Questions” White House roundtable. “The fact of the matter is there are laws on the books I have to enforce.”

There are 2 different videos, Einstein. The other video is a video from 9/28/11 and has the politico quote. Or, should i say, has the politico partial quote.

Now quit making a fool of yourself.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by CJ7

sheesh ... are you specific challenged or what?

ok, I'll go s ..... l ..... o ..... w

Reagan
Bush41
Clinton
Bush43


all used executive orders for immigration purposes.

The issue is whether or not they acted illegally. That's why you have to be specific. Using executive orders for immigration purposes is not necessarily illegal. It depends on exactly what they did. I assume, since your not willing to provide details, that you've got nothing, as usual.

When you thow mud against the wall, it doesn't always stick.

[CJ7]

Originally Posted by joe bloe

The issue is whether or not they acted illegally. That's why you have to be specific. Using executive orders for immigration purposes is not necessarily illegal. It depends on exactly what they did. I assume, since your not willing to provide details, that you've got nothing, as usual.

When you thow mud against the wall, it doesn't always stick.

proving or providing details means exactly jack shit to you and idiots like IB ... you seem really quick to ask for proof but NEVER attempt to disprove anything ... you pit your opinion against facts (all day yesterday) and you say Ive got nothing.


specifically, youre excused, and take I(diot)B with you.

[joe bloe]

Originally Posted by CJ7

proving or providing details means exactly jack shit to you and idiots like IB ... you seem really quick to ask for proof but NEVER attempt to disprove anything ... you pit your opinion against facts (all day yesterday) and you say Ive got nothing.


specifically, youre excused, and take I(diot)B with you.

Just like I thought. You've got nothing.