So, you still think Covid came from Bats?

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Why do people always try to blame naturally occurring diseases on some kind of intentional effort. Evolution has been infecting humans with bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections for hundreds of thousands of years.

typhoid, rabies, polio, diphtheria, malaria, the avian flu, the 1918 pandemic, the bubonic plague, etc, etc. The list goes on and on.

All of these diseases came about naturally. There is no reason to suspect that the novel coronavirus is any different.

You want to wipe your face. Your drool cup is overflowing again.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Why do people always try to blame naturally occurring diseases on some kind of intentional effort. Evolution has been infecting humans with bacterial infections, viral infections, fungal infections for hundreds of thousands of years.

typhoid, rabies, polio, diphtheria, malaria, the avian flu, the 1918 pandemic, the bubonic plague, etc, etc. The list goes on and on.

All of these diseases came about naturally. There is no reason to suspect that the novel coronavirus is any different.

That's true organisms mutate all the time through the forces of Nature. When was the last time a mutation of a Pathogen received this much publicity?

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Gates has given 100 different interviews pretending to be some kind of expert in the field. Like I said, his money is welcome, but he should stroke checks and stfu because he has no expertise on the subject whatsoever.

I saw two or three of the interviews and see your point.

[GastonGlock]

We believe in SCIENCE in this country!

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

That's true organisms mutate all the time through the forces of Nature.

You're correct ....

[rexdutchman]

Simple answer NO, longer answer bioweapons lab ( controlled by n>s>a , N<I>H etc)

[bambino]

After 15 months the WaPo finally retracts their reporting that the lab theory was a box;


https://www.theblaze.com/news/washin...dline-lab-leak

Some people here are so spell bound by the MSM. They lie everyday, by design.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

That's because there is a scientific consensus that 150 years of human based carbon dioxide release has contributed to a global rise in average temperatures...

So you are an oxygen denier?!? What's your problem with oxygen anyway? Here's a question: What do trees (and pretty much anything growing and green) do with Carbon-dioxide?

Besides that, your science is cr*p, more like fear-porn. Sorry, hate to break it to you so short and sweet. Here is an example from 2019 to illustrate the point. Read this article: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/11-bill...-just-one-day/

Now, search the internets for similar (Greenland ice melt). There are hundreds. But here is the kicker: They are all pretty much identical and appear to all source from the same origin article. This made the airwaves in a big way, total fear-porn, we're all gonna die, yadda-yadda. Welcome to the echo chamber.

But then, one lone voice in the wilderness (withing 2 days, mind you) asked themselves a simple question: Is loosing 11B tonnes of ice on a glacier in Greenland normal? Welp, turns out yes and no and maybe. For quite a while, you could search on the exact author and title of the article and only find the few hundred fear-porn articles, with the target article buried on page 4 of the search results. Seems it is now searchable correctly - score one for the anti-censors ;-)

Spoiler alert: the below article contains actual data and may cause discomfort in Liberal's minds (sic), for those infected with TDS, estimated by me at 90+%, it may cause spontaneous combustion - a good thing IMHO.

Feel free to read:https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...rifying-truth/

The synopsis goes something like: Right now Greenland is losing 11B tons of ice per day due to a phenomenon known locally as 'summer'. At that rate, Greenland will shed just under 50% of it's glacial ice in just 12,500 years. However, prognosticators are predicting the phenomenon, known locally as 'winter' will return this year. The last few winters saw Greenland's glacial ice grow in excess of what it lost in the 'summer'. This rate of extend/reduce could lead to Greenland loosing 50% of it's glacial ice in a mere 12,500,000 years.

Egads! We're all gonna not actually die any time soon. Yeah team humans!

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

...There is no scientific consensus of any kind that shows that the novel coronavirus has been artificially created or modified in any way. By all means we should investigate the possibility but the odds are that the novel coronavirus is a naturally evolved virus that jumped from animals to humans. Just like all the others before it.

Apologies, but I'm in a bit of a rush today, so I don't have the time to take the full Monty crap dump on your lack of inquisitiveness. However, as I am merciful, I will share this post with you, from this very thread:

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?p=1...post1062477396
Don't be lazy, read it and see what sort of light bulbs go off.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Welcome back. While you were gone I gave you credit for saving my life, from death by COVID....

Don't make me live to regret it ;-) I had scant little to do with it. It was the MATH protocol from a college in Virginia, I think.

Thanks for making me #1 on your list. I would like to the thank the Little People...

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

That's because there is a scientific consensus that 150 years of human based carbon dioxide release has contributed to a global rise in average temperatures.

tdg, this human based climate change is bullshit. garbage in, garbage out.


what we do is not enough to cause temps to rise.


and we are off track on this subject.

[bambino]

https://t.me/ItalyQanons/2940

[GastonGlock]

We're not harming the earth, the earth is doing fine. The difference is that like any runaway organic we can make our ecosystem hostile to ourselves.

It's like making wine or beer: the yeast drops into a solution with plenty of sugar and starts pigging out, as it does, it shits alcohol. As this continues, there's less sugar for it to eat, and the alcohol builds up to the point that it starts killing some of the yeast.

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by GastonGlock

...It's like making wine or beer: the yeast drops into a solution with plenty of sugar and starts pigging out, as it does, it shits alcohol...

Yum-yum. Gots to get me a chilled glass of that yeast-poop. Like I say to my best gal-pal: Bottoms up!

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by GastonGlock

We believe in SCIENCE in this country!

Is that a horse bit around that heshe's neck?
What an embarrassment

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

That's because there is a scientific consensus .....

There is no scientific consensus of any kind .....

Since you like the phrase "scientific consensus" ...

... what is the "scientific consensus" on what created the Great Lakes?

Definition of consensus (Websters)
1a: general agreement : UNANIMITY

#1: There is NO UNANIMITY of the current centuries "global warming" being caused by humans ....

#2: You will NEVER have "scientific UNANAMITY" on either human caused global warming OR the source of Covid19 cells.

As for global warming ... the "scientists" will have to UNANIMOUSLY explain what caused GLOBAL WARMING millions and billions of YEARS AGO ... BEFORE MAN EXISTED.

As for the Covid19 cells .... "the expert" Fakie Fauci will have to agree .... that man created the final product described as Covid19 ... in HIS FINANCED LAB ... and he ain't gonna do it!

Please quit eating Lemon's Tootie rolls.