For those who need proof of election fraud....

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

That’s a lie Speedy.


Here’s more truth. Another one caught on video running ballots multiple times in Georgia.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...lection-night/

I won't even read anything published by TGP. Empty allegations with no proof.

A hand recount was done in Georgia. OUtput from the computers matched 100% the ballot count.

Raffensperger said in a statement Thursday that the results reaffirm the integrity of the state's election process.

"Georgia's historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state's new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results," he said. "This is a credit to the hard work of our county and local elections officials who moved quickly to undertake and complete such a momentous task in a short period of time."

Let's just say I believe the REPUBLICAN SOS in Georgia over an article produced by a rag like TGP.

Since someone objected to my citing Politifact in attacking the credibility of TGP:

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-con...tion-Label.pdf

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit

Which websites can be considered ‘Fake News’?

This was one of the biggest questions that stuck out in my mind when I sat down to do this analysis.

The below list is any news source rated with a reliability factor of lower than 24 points (37.4%) according to Ad Fontes Media. News sources falling within these metrics can be considered to produce a significant amount of purposefully non-factual articles.

Be extremely skeptical when reading these news sources:

🔴World Truth TV — 11.6%
🟢National Enquirer — 15.1%
🔴The Gateway Pundit — 19.4%
🔴InfoWars — 20.3%
🔴NewsPunch — 22.5%
🔵Wonkette — 23.9%
🔴WorldNetDaily — 26.5%
🔴Twitchy — 26.7%
🔵Palmer Report — 27.6%
🔴PJ Media — 28.7%
🔵Bipartisan Report — 30.1%
🔵Occupy Democrats — 31.3%
🔴Breitbart — 32.2%
🔵Alternet — 33.4%
🔴Conservative Review — 34.1%
🔴The American Spectator — 34.4%
🔴The Federalist — 34.7%
🔵ShareBlue — 35.5%
🔵Crooks and Liars — 36%
🔴American Thinker — 36.1%
🔵Daily Kos — 36.2%
🔴Daily Caller — 37.4%

8 of the above 22 news sources can be considered to have a liberal bias, with 14 of 22 having a conservative bias

187 million total visits from Americans in July

47k (World Truth TV) to 13 million (Breitbart) unique visitors
3.3 average monthly visits per person

Every one of these websites can be considered very biased as well as very unreliable for factual information — with the odd exception of a neutrally ranked National Enquirer

https://towardsdatascience.com/how-s...s-f28f0fab3cb3

[bambino]

Then you should feel confident in the results of a forensic audit. The propaganda media says so.


NCSWIC

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I won't even read anything published by TGP. Empty allegations with no proof.

A hand recount was done in Georgia. OUtput from the computers matched 100% the ballot count.

Raffensperger said in a statement Thursday that the results reaffirm the integrity of the state's election process.

"Georgia's historic first statewide audit reaffirmed that the state's new secure paper ballot voting system accurately counted and reported results," he said. "This is a credit to the hard work of our county and local elections officials who moved quickly to undertake and complete such a momentous task in a short period of time."

Let's just say I believe the REPUBLICAN SOS in Georgia over an article produced by a rag like TGP.

Since someone objected to my citing Politifact in attacking the credibility of TGP:

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-con...tion-Label.pdf

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/gateway-pundit

Which websites can be considered ‘Fake News’?

This was one of the biggest questions that stuck out in my mind when I sat down to do this analysis.

The below list is any news source rated with a reliability factor of lower than 24 points (37.4%) according to Ad Fontes Media. News sources falling within these metrics can be considered to produce a significant amount of purposefully non-factual articles.

Be extremely skeptical when reading these news sources:

🔴World Truth TV — 11.6%
🟢National Enquirer — 15.1%
🔴The Gateway Pundit — 19.4%
🔴InfoWars — 20.3%
🔴NewsPunch — 22.5%
🔵Wonkette — 23.9%
🔴WorldNetDaily — 26.5%
🔴Twitchy — 26.7%
🔵Palmer Report — 27.6%
🔴PJ Media — 28.7%
🔵Bipartisan Report — 30.1%
🔵Occupy Democrats — 31.3%
🔴Breitbart — 32.2%
🔵Alternet — 33.4%
🔴Conservative Review — 34.1%
🔴The American Spectator — 34.4%
🔴The Federalist — 34.7%
🔵ShareBlue — 35.5%
🔵Crooks and Liars — 36%
🔴American Thinker — 36.1%
🔵Daily Kos — 36.2%
🔴Daily Caller — 37.4%

8 of the above 22 news sources can be considered to have a liberal bias, with 14 of 22 having a conservative bias

187 million total visits from Americans in July

47k (World Truth TV) to 13 million (Breitbart) unique visitors
3.3 average monthly visits per person

Every one of these websites can be considered very biased as well as very unreliable for factual information — with the odd exception of a neutrally ranked National Enquirer

https://towardsdatascience.com/how-s...s-f28f0fab3cb3

Amazing how many of those are considered fact by our colleagues across the reality divide.

[bambino]

Woop!

https://t.me/CandlesInTheNight/11942

[bambino]

https://t.me/BoldSpearElmerFudd/20600


BAHAHAHAHA

[bambino]

https://rumble.com/vivzjp-dave-hayes...nly-way-f.html

One falls, they all fall.

WWG1WGA

NCSWIC

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by bambino

Then you should feel confident in the results of a forensic audit. The propaganda media says so.


NCSWIC

I would be confident in any audit done by an unbiased organization. That is not what is being done in Arizona.

What’s Happening In Arizona Is Not Really An Audit Or A Recount. It’s A Partisan Inquisition.

Six-plus months later, Maricopa County’s ballots are still being counted — but by another group entirely. For the past five weeks, workers from Cyber Ninjas, a small private cybersecurity company based in Sarasota, Florida, have gathered in an arena to re-recount all the ballots — nearly 2.1 million — at the behest of the state’s Republican senators. Auditors have reportedly scanned ballots with UV lights to look for secret watermarks that conspiracy theorists believe then-President Donald Trump’s Department of Homeland Security placed on legitimate ballots to differentiate them from fraudulent ones; they’ve also inspected ballots for traces of bamboo to determine if they were imported from Asia. The process was supposed to be completed by May 14, but workers were unable to finish the count in time, so the state Senate has extended its lease at the arena through the end of June.

Audits and recounts are an essential part of our voting system, but what’s happening in Arizona isn’t. The state Senate that ordered the process is calling it an audit, and all the ballots are being recounted, but it’s not really an audit or a recount — it’s a partisan inquisition. Conducted by a company founded by an election-fraud conspiracy theorist and Trump supporter, the process is funded mostly by Trump loyalists and fails to meet any of the standards required for official recounts or audits by state law. The process indulges the fantasies of the most extreme political fringe while ignoring the fact that there is zero evidence of any election fraud to warrant such intense scrutiny. The result will almost certainly not be the greater transparency Republican state senators claim they seek. The review — and others like it — may instead further erode trust in our elections.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features...-anything-but/

[bambino]

Facts are facts. Would you trust the Military?

[Jacuzzme]

Funny Speedy has no problem with who was counting ballots in urban precincts, the ones with huge one sided ballot drops in the middle of the night, yet if someone who supports President Trump does the counting it’s completely invalid.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

Funny Speedy has no problem with who was counting ballots in urban precincts, the ones with huge one sided ballot drops in the middle of the night, yet if someone who supports President Trump does the counting it’s completely invalid.

But he trusts Nate Silver!!!! A proven hack.


https://www.currentaffairs.org/2016/...to-nate-silver

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

I won't even read anything published by TGP. ...

You funny AF.
You trust the Weapons of Mass Deception because Muh RUSSIA?!?
CNNLoL, Always Been Clinton ABC, MSDNC ... To freak'n funny hunny.

You go on goose-stepping to your Ministry of Truth Overloards like a good little Red Comrade. Eh? All hail Hydra!

[bambino]

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America

Georgia now plans to remove over 100,000 “obsolete and outdated” names off their voter rolls. Doing this, they say, will ensure voting files are up to date, while at the same time ensuring voter integrity in future elections. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE LAST ELECTION? WHY WASN’T THIS DONE PRIOR TO THE NOVEMBER 3RDPRESIDENTIAL ELECTION, where they had us losing by a very small number of votes, many times less than the 101,789 figure? This means we (you!) won the Presidential Election in Georgia. But don’t fret, much other information will soon be revealed about Georgia—and other States as well. It is coming out FAST and FURIOUS. The 2020 Presidential Election was rigged!

[pfunkdenver]

[bambino]

Yeah, for those who think Joey Bribes won!!!!!

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

Yep.

Time to stop feeding the trqlls.