The Mueller report

[bambino]

Why?

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

Oh brother, this is too much. The Mueller Report now has become a Legal Document. Nothing in it can be reversed or amended. The Words "No collusion, No Obstruction" are now cut in stone. In order for Trump to be impeached there must be a completely new allocation far removed from anything associated with the Mueller Report and Russian Collusion. Again the Democrats are playing a silly little Political game of "Catch as Catch Can" and they will lose. These people are stupid.

So, if one is convicted of collusion what is the punishment? Why can’t devoted members of the trump party understand that Collusion is not a Crime. My point being, of course he’s innocent of collusion because it isn’t chargeable, but Obstruction is.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

So, if one is convicted of collusion what is the punishment? Why can’t devoted members of the trump party understand that Collusion is not a Crime. My point being, of course he’s innocent of collusion because it isn’t chargeable, but Obstruction is.

If collusion isn’t a crime, what did he obstruct?????

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by bambino

If collusion isn’t a crime, what did he obstruct?????

Hillary Clinton being President.


BAHHAHAAAAAAA

[bambino]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Hillary Clinton being President.


BAHHAHAAAAAAA

That was a God send, not a crime.

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

So, if one is convicted of collusion what is the punishment? Why can’t devoted members of the trump party understand that Collusion is not a Crime. My point being, of course he’s innocent of collusion because it isn’t chargeable, but Obstruction is.

Of course Obstruction of Justice is a chargeable offense. The big question is what did he obstruct? That's been the big milestone nobody can explain other than he didn't obstruct justice. This whole thing is making Democrats look really stupid. They are trying to pick Gnat Shit out of a hay stack it's even harder when you don't know what Gnat Shit looks like, lol.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Well, it’s looking more like a political coup but the Clintons aren’t involved. Putin and his hand picked oligarchs aided by Russian military agents succeeded in a political coup in 2016. No matter how much deep state conspiracy bullshit the trump party spews it will never change the fact that the Russian military attacked the US. That is a fact that will be prominent in the history books.

so you thinck a few facefag ad's constitutes a coup? really? did they invade Marky Suckerturd's office?

let's look at some of these ad's shall we?


bernie sanders ... gay superhero .. er gay rights superhero. who would have known without them russkies????





yeah ... that's an invasion!! not!





so what's so offensive about this?


i find this one amusing ....







BAHHAAAAAA


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/01/u...-facebook.html


and more here ...

https://medium.com/@ushadrons



if you really think this was an invasion ... your facts are wrong.

[Jaxson66]

Originally Posted by bambino

If collusion isn’t a crime, what did he obstruct?????

When you understand the difference between collusion and obstruction that question will answer itself

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

When you understand the difference between collusion and obstruction that question will answer itself

when you understand your hatred of Trump isn't an impeachable offense then your failure will answer itself.

[bambino]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

When you understand the difference between collusion and obstruction that question will answer itself

Oh, I know the difference. When you understand there wasn’t a crime committed, you can’t obstruct one. Duh!!!!!!! But don’t worry, Mueller will clear all this up IF he shows up Wednesday.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

When you understand the difference between collusion and obstruction that question will answer itself

Obstruction requires an illegal action taken to hide a primary crime. No primary crime was committed, and nothing the president did was outside the purview of his office. Educate yourself and read Barr's memo on the subject.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by Jaxson66

So, if one is convicted of collusion what is the punishment? Why can’t devoted members of the trump party understand that Collusion is not a Crime. My point being, of course he’s innocent of collusion because it isn’t chargeable, but Obstruction is.

The word collusion is not a legal term actually. Muellar put in his report that team Trump did not participate with the Russians to manipulate our elections (although they shared the same goal). Thus team Trump is not guilty of participating in the conspiracy to manipulate our elections. Muellar did give 10 examples of Obstruction. Trump tried to cover something up that he thought may have been a crime. The example with McGhan is probably the strongest one of the ten. Judge Napolitano of Fox (Trump's good friend of 30 years) commented several times(in his opinion) that the example with McGhan is where Trump committed or attempted to commit Obstruction of justice. We'll just have to wait and see what happens with the hearings. You're doing a good job. Keep up the good work.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Obstruction requires an illegal action taken to hide a primary crime. No primary crime was committed, and nothing the president did was outside the purview of his office. Educate yourself and read Barr's memo on the subject.

18 U.S.C. § 2381 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 2381. Treason


https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-2381.html





'You are asking my client to lie': Flynn lawyers fought with prosecutor



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...ecutor-1411495

At the initial sentencing hearing last December, prosecutors recommended no jail time for Flynn, who spent 24 days as President Donald Trump’s first national security adviser before being fired for misleading his colleagues and investigators about his contacts with Russian officials.

Not even four weeks.

All I see is a bunch of trees.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

18 U.S.C. § 2381 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 2381. Treason


https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-1...sect-2381.html





'You are asking my client to lie': Flynn lawyers fought with prosecutor



https://www.politico.com/story/2019/...ecutor-1411495

Not even four weeks.

All I see is a bunch of trees.

Treason. Flynn? really? your politico article doesn't mention one word about it. so that must be wishful thinking on your part.


when it is shown by the IG's report that Obama and Clinton committed treason with the aid of foreign nationals are you going to watch the executions?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

[CENTER]18 U.S.C. § 2381 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 2381. Treason

'You are asking my client to lie': Flynn lawyers fought with prosecutor


Not even four weeks.

All I see is a bunch of trees.

Barr is the DOJ. You really do need to educate yourself on the definition of "obstruction" as defined by the current DOJ with all of the legal citations and annotations that will stand up to scrutiny in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Originally Posted by adav8s28

The word collusion is not a legal term actually. Muellar put in his report that team Trump did not participate with the Russians to manipulate our elections (although they shared the same goal). Thus team Trump is not guilty of participating in the conspiracy to manipulate our elections. Muellar did give 10 examples of Obstruction. Trump tried to cover something up that he thought may have been a crime. The example with McGhan is probably the strongest one of the ten. Judge Napolitano of Fox (Trump's good friend of 30 years) commented several times(in his opinion) that the example with McGhan is where Trump committed or attempted to commit Obstruction of justice. We'll just have to wait and see what happens with the hearings. You're doing a good job. Keep up the good work.

That's a fucking subjective analysis for which you haven't a fucking scintilla of substantive proof that will withstand the scrutiny of cross examination in an American courtroom.