Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
400 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70831 | biomed1 | 63764 | Yssup Rider | 61312 | gman44 | 53378 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48842 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37431 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
02-08-2015, 12:23 AM
|
#76
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
A New Orleans newspaper discussing New Orleans is a good deal more credible than you, Brian Williams or any external source that happens to excite your mediocre understanding.
|
I guess it's good for me then since it only takes mediocre understanding to see you're more full of shit than a christmas turkey.
You mean THIS new orleans newspaper? Why don't you check the very first line where they updated the previous story to say that water did indeed surround the hotel he was staying in.
http://www.theneworleansadvocate.com...brian-williams
Here's the updated story:
http://www.theneworleansadvocate.com...show-water-did
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 12:27 AM
|
#77
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
|
But the hotel wasn't in the French Quarter, you imbecilic jackass. Furthermore, you imbecilic jackass, from the second article you cited:
Quote:
The French Quarter, the original high ground of New Orleans, was not impacted by the floodwaters that overwhelmed the vast majority of the city.
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 12:29 AM
|
#78
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
But the hotel wasn't in the French Quarter, you imbecilic jackass. Furthermore, you imbecilic jackass, from the second article you cited:
|
Just outside the french quarter. Now you want to parse details? In the other thread you're avoiding details like the fucking plague. Water surrounded the hotel he stayed in, that's the point. I'm not sure why you're even arguing. I already said the guy was a liar about the chopper and should be fired.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 12:37 AM
|
#79
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Just outside the french quarter. Now you want to parse details? In the other thread you're avoiding details like the fucking plague. Water surrounded the hotel he stayed in, that's the point. I'm not sure why you're even arguing. I already said the guy was a liar about the chopper and should be fired.
|
No "parsing" to it, asshole, the facts are the facts.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:01 AM
|
#80
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
No "parsing" to it, asshole, the facts are the facts.
|
With you, the facts are rarely ever the facts. It was on the border of the french quarter. BFD.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:05 AM
|
#81
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
With you, the facts are rarely ever the facts. It was on the border of the french quarter. BFD.
|
You're "parsing" now that the facts have bit you in your lib-retarded ass, jackass.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:10 AM
|
#82
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You're "parsing" now that the facts have bit you in your lib-retarded ass, jackass.
|
So you agree that the hotel he stayed in was surrounded by flood waters?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:14 AM
|
#83
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
So you agree that the hotel he stayed in was surrounded by flood waters?
|
Standing outside, in front of his hotel, Williams did not see a body "floating in flood water in the French Quarter", because the French Quarter did not flood.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:18 AM
|
#84
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Standing outside, in front of his hotel, Williams did not see a body "floating in flood water in the French Quarter", because the French Quarter did not flood.
|
We've already established he wasn't staying in the french quarter, remember? You're so simple you've gotten tangled up in your own lies and stories. How cute. The truth is, you don't know what the fuck he saw, you weren't there. Neither was I.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:22 AM
|
#85
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
We've already established he wasn't staying in the french quarter, remember? You're so simple you've gotten tangled up in your own lies and stories. How cute. The truth is, you don't know what the fuck he saw, you weren't there. Neither was I.
|
FACT: Williams did not -- could not -- see a body "floating in flood water in the French Quarter", because the French Quarter did not flood.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:37 AM
|
#86
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
FACT: Williams did not -- could not -- see a body "floating in flood water in the French Quarter", because the French Quarter did not flood.
|
Doesn't mean he didn't see a body. And there were parts of the quarter that did receive minor flooding, especially near the border of Canal, across the street from where he was staying. I'm interested in getting it right. You're just interested in 'facts' as you call them.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:42 AM
|
#87
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
Doesn't mean he didn't see a body. And there were parts of the quarter that did receive minor flooding, especially near the border of Canal, across the street from where he was staying. I'm interested in getting it right. You're just interested in 'facts' as you call them.
|
No "flooding" in the French Quarter means no "floating body" in the French Quarter. Even a simpleton like you should be able to figure that out, moron.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:44 AM
|
#88
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
No "flooding" in the French Quarter means no "floating body" in the French Quarter. Even a simpleton like you should be able to figure that out, moron.
|
I stipulated the body could have been floating elsewhere... moron
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 01:52 AM
|
#89
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderConstruction
I stipulated the body could have been floating elsewhere... moron
|
That's disingenuous deflection on your part, because you were defending what Williams said, jackass.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
02-08-2015, 02:18 AM
|
#90
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 29, 2014
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 3,378
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
That's disingenuous deflection on your part, because you were defending what Williams said, jackass.
|
Goddamn, you're thick. I've said twice that he lied and should be fired. How is that anything close to defending him. I simply want to know the true story about what he said regarding New Orleans. We don't know that yet so I'm not sure how you can claim victory just yet. The difference between you and I is I'm not forced to stay within this box, like you. I go where the truth is, regardless of the party of the person involved. If you think republicans are any better, you're dumber than I already think you are. And that's pretty dumb, just fyi.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|