The President's Speech Tonight

[SpeedRacerXXX]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It is okay to bring lawsuits for anything if they have merit. FYI, there aren't many laws out there "banning" gay marriage. What you really have are laws that define what "marriage" is. So it is not a ban.

As for as deviants go, anything that is outside the norm is by definition deviant. So fly your freak flag proudly and accept your deviance. Unless of course that playing with hookers is far more mainstream (you have to include everyone, not just conservatives) that you want to believe then what we are doing is normal and not deviant. Since the Secret Service can do it, it must be pretty normal. Shoving your cock up some guys ass is still in the small minority.

Hmmm. I missed this one.

If a law defines marriage as a union of a man and a woman, it is in effect stating that a man cannot marry a man, thereby banning it.

As far as homosexuality being "deviant" -- as cited over 50% of U.S. adults believe homosexuals have the right to marry. If a person believes they have the right to marry, they are accepting their lifestyle IMHO. They might not like it or agree with the lifestyle but they are accepting of it. Then you have to factor in a percentage of those that don't support gay marriage but accept the lifestyle. Probably a significant number too.

As I asked before, swingers are as uncommon as homosexuals. So are swingers living a deviant lifestyle?

[gnadfly]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

From what I can gather, the main crux is to give somewhat legal status to some 5 million "illegals" who have children that are Citizens due to the fact that the children were born here.

They have now fulfilled the objective of having a "anchor baby".

One thing is for sure. We will not know the ramifications of this "historic" Executive Action until 5 or 10 years down the line. If at that time, we once again are faced with several million "illegals" with children born on this side of the River, another President, along with the entire Country, will be faced with exactly the same set of circumstances we are faced with now.

The reason. Because once you get past all the bull shit, nobody is going to do one god damned thing about securing the Border.

Businesses will still have a good source of cheap labor, the Democrats will have a whole new group to promise and pander too, and the unemployment rate in Black America will probably top 25 percent.

Because that is who will loose the jobs.

Years ago, Another Democrat President made the statement, "we will have those n.....s voting Democrat for the next 100 years", after his "landmark" legislation went through. Look what it has got that particular ethnic minority.

I wonder if President Obama, in a candid moment, might say. "We will have those S...s voting Democrat for the 100 years.

The handle has been pulled. The water has swirled. And that big turd that used to be the greatest country on the Planet is heading toward the "septic tank of failed Republics".

I hate to bring us back to the OP's posted topic but....

It's been four days and the two EOs that Obama supposedly signed have yet to be posted on the http://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-r...ecutive-orders site.

Strange. Also why did he sign two instead of one?

[IIFFOFRDB]