Quote:
Originally Posted by pjorourke
Even I am not going to touch this line.
|
What? About sex being a pain in the @ss sometimes? Well, I admit ... an unfortunate choice of words! LOL
How about this: "Sometimes the pleasure derived from sex is insufficient to justify the logistical and scheduling problems it entails."
For me, the minimum time outside of a session that is entailed in travel, logistics and scheduling is 6 hours. That time is shortened up to only 2-3 hours if there is no sex; so sometimes a no-sex date is just a lot more feasible.
This is no different than the pricing arguments really. A man plunks down his money when he believes the woman's merits cross the threshold of her pricing so that *to him* she represents a good value. Well, my time is valuable just like my money. For me to plunk down 6 hours of time on top of the time scheduled for the session, the woman has convinced me that I would enjoy her intimate company sufficiently to be worth the 6 hours.
Sometimes, even if I am quite convinced, I just don't have the 6 hours. But I might scrape up two or three. That's where the no-sex date comes in. Anyone I'd schedule for a no-sex date is someone that, if I had the 6 hours proximately, I'd happily schedule for a sex date instead.