JEB BUSH TRIES TO "PULL THE WOOL" OVER THE GOP SHAKERS.....

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by rioseco

Look you eletist moron. You have no fucking right to question anyone on being polite ! You are a quibbling little maggot RACIST. You put down people that you can agree with simply because they are of different color than yourself. You are two-faced, lying hypocrite. I say, go fuck yourself !

How about completing a thought here, IF? I have just as much a right to question politeness as you do. Unlike you, however, when I do it, you damned sure can understand what I'm trying to say.

It's not because I'm black, either.

And who addressed you anyway, IF?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

...The answer is that the National Debt would now be lower by $13.5 trillion! So that’s the Republican National Debt — according to their own standard of balanced budgets.

Nice try, fagboy, but the graph is bullshit and the libtard economist who created it knows it. You can't just go back and assume if Reagan and Bush had balanced the budget for (an unprecedented) 12 consecutive years, the rest of the economy would have stayed the same. Higher taxes would have meant much slower growth, fewer jobs, more welfare spending and a whole host of other differences in the trajectory taken by the economy. So the methodology behind the $13.5 trillion number is bogus. You can't balance a budget during a recession (like 1981 or 1990) without making the downturn longer and deeper. Most libtard economists are Keynesians so they know this well. They just pretend otherwise when convenient in order to try and make Republicans look bad.

Now for your homework assignment, read up on the difference between static and dynamic budget scoring.

.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

You can't balance a budget during a recession (like 1981 or 1990) without making the downturn longer and deeper. Most libtard economists are Keynesians so they know this well. They just pretend otherwise when convenient in order to try and make Republicans look bad.



.

Do you realize how ignorant you sound. Basically you are saying that Reagan was a Keynesians when the chips were down , just like GWB was.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Do you realize how ignorant you sound. Basically you are saying that Reagan was a Keynesian when the chips were down, just like GWB was.

Hahaha, you're calling me ignorant? You are a gushing fountain of ignorance with every post on eccie! What's your point, fagboy? Pretending you can hold your own in a real discussion on economics? Wanna tell us what a Keynesian is? Will you quote from The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money? Hahahaha. Question for you, fagboy - How many times did Reagan quote JFK and praise his (posthumously enacted) 1964 tax cut? That was a very Keynesian piece of legislation. At the time, it was applauded and praised by Keynesian economists everywhere. Chew on that, fagboy.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Hahaha, you're calling me ignorant? You are a gushing fountain of ignorance with every post on eccie! What's your point, fagboy? Pretending you can hold your own in a real discussion on economics? Wanna tell us what a Keynesian is? Will you quote from The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money? Hahahaha. Question for you, fagboy - How many times did Reagan quote JFK and praise his (posthumously enacted) 1964 tax cut? That was a very Keynesian piece of legislation. At the time, it was applauded and praised by Keynesian economists everywhere. Chew on that, fagboy.

I notice that you do not dispute that Reagan was a Keynesians when he had to be!

Originally Posted by lustylad
You can't balance a budget during a recession (like 1981 or 1990) without making the downturn longer and deeper. Most libtard economists are Keynesians so they know this well.

[lustylad]

A true Keynesian knows that cutting taxes is one way to stimulate the economy. Reagan understood this as well as anyone. He believed in lowering everyone's taxes and he acted on those beliefs. So what's your point, fagboy? Or am I foolish to suggest you even have one?

[WTF]

Reagan lowered everyone's then raise it back on the middle class. The very people that actually stimulate the economy with the savings.

Now take Reagan's dick out of your ass and clean it off with your big mouth.

I knew you were a dumb shit but I did not realize you really fell for Ronnie's Supply Side caca...


.

[lustylad]

WhinyTrannyFagboy, you are a broken record. Nothing new, just bleat out the same old lies. Repeat, repeat, repeat. No point in wasting time on your tiresome nonsense when I can just repost what you couldn't answer last time around. Now stop whining about Ronnie. Everyone knows you are the biggest supply sider on this board. You're the guy who explained the Laffer Curve to the rest of us economic neophytes. It was your one moment of triumph. The only time you almost held your own in a discussion of economics. So take a bow and don't tell us it's all caca.

Originally Posted by lustylad

We had this discussion before, fagboy. If I lower your taxes by a dollar and then raise them by a nickle, you still wind up with a nice big fat net tax cut of 95 cents. Everyone knows that Ronnie's tax cuts were far greater in magnitude than any subsequent increases. You admitted the top rate of 70% was too high, according to your expert Laffer Curve analysis. Are you now repudiating yourself, fagboy? So you let Ronnie lick your Laffer Curve sweet spot, give you a nice blowjob, and now you turn around and trash him for it?

Very uncool, fagboy. Bad form indeed.

Originally Posted by lustylad

You're the Laffer Curve expert, remember? According to your expert opinion, the Laffer Curve teaches us we should always cut taxes when we're in the "sweet spot", right?

And that's exactly what Ronnie did. He followed your prescription and cut taxes, thereby lick-stimulating your sweet spot so much that federal revenues swelled by 76% in eight years! From $517 billion in FY 1980 to $909 billion in FY 1988. FACT JACK!

[rioseco]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

How about completing a thought here, IF? I have just as much a right to question politeness as you do. Unlike you, however, when I do it, you damned sure can understand what I'm trying to say.

It's not because I'm black, either.

And who addressed you anyway, IF?

Fuck off, shit stain !

[WTF]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
You're the Laffer Curve expert, remember? According to your expert opinion, the Laffer Curve teaches us we should always cut taxes when we're in the "sweet spot", right?

I never said that.

You do understand that the optimal tax rate is elastic do you not?

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

I never said that.

Yeah, you did. BUSTED AGAIN, FAGBOY! Hoisted on your own petard! Reagan cut taxes and got a bump in tax revenues, so he evidently found your sweet spot!

Originally Posted by WTF

Well let me give you a brief factoid of the Laffer Curve....If taxes are to high and you cut them, you will get a bump in tax revenues. If they are to low and you raise them, you will get an increase in tax revenues. It is called a sweet spot....I have explained the Laffer Curve.

[WTF]

Please explain to me where , anywhere in my quote did I say we should always cut taxes when we're in the "sweet spot",

I explained what would happen if you raised or cut taxes if taxes were at a certain spot on the Curve. Nothing more. If you are at the optimum rate, theoretically any move you make would lower tax receipts.

So what you have done is make up something I said just because you do not know wtf you are talking about.

Like I said earlier the optimum rate if fluid. The economy is a big fucking Eco system



Originally Posted by lustylad
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
You're the Laffer Curve expert, remember? According to your expert opinion, the Laffer Curve teaches us we should always cut taxes when we're in the "sweet spot", right?

Originally Posted by WTF
Well let me give you a brief factoid of the Laffer Curve....If taxes are to high and you cut them, you will get a bump in tax revenues. If they are to low and you raise them, you will get an increase in tax revenues. It is called a sweet spot....I have explained the Laffer Curve.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by WTF

I never said that.

You do understand that the optimal tax rate is elastic do you not?

The proper word is "dynamic", you total moron. Not "elastic". You read an article on economics, and have no clue what you read.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The proper word is "dynamic", you total moron. Not "elastic". You read an article on economics, and have no clue what you read.

How bout I kick my dynamic boot four foot up your elastic ass

Now had I read an article recently on this fucking Laffer Curve I might be upset with my self for interchanging comparable words but since it has been a while since i read up on ole Art...I'm not to worried about using azure for say blue. And for the record I've never claimed to be an economic professor like your dumb ass. So stick your nit picking up your boyfriend's asshole.



.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

Please explain to me where, anywhere in my quote did I say we should always cut taxes when we're in the "sweet spot".

Ok fagboy, I'll rephrase for you - According to your expert opinion, the Laffer Curve teaches us we should always cut taxes when we're in the sweet spot where it gets us a bump in revenues.

Reagan enjoyed a 76% bump in tax revenues during his tenure because he followed your fagboy advice. You told him exactly how and where to lick your sweet spot. He licked it good with his tax cuts. He followed your instructions so well he gave you an orgasm that was 76% more pleasurable than anything you experienced before or since down in Tranny Alley. Sigh. Does this refresh your memory?