FINALLY - The Capitol Footage!

[Why_Yes_I_Do]

Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

This is all bullshit. Same as giving only Giuliani access to the laptop drive...

That is patently false. We know and even you know it. Rewind the tape and see for yourself. Therefore anything else you have to say on the matter is based on a lie, making your whole a compound false hood. Go pedal crazy somewhere else.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Tigbitties38

This is all bullshit. Same as giving only Giuliani access to the laptop drive.

I can hardly wait. America will sweep you commies from office in 2024. We've had enough of your lies.

You people will post the same lies you did in 2021.

wait, what? i thought Republicans were fascists and the Democrats the commie socialists.

am i wrong?

bahhahahhaaaa


Rudy never had the laptop. the FBI does. where is their report proving it's Russian disinformation?


bahahhahhaaa


if the video from the security cameras showed anything that helped the kangaroo committee they'd have it on the evening news of every major outlet in the world. so why didn't they?


here's a thought .. what if it shows things they don't want known??

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

wait, what? i thought Republicans were fascists and the Democrats the commie socialists.

am i wrong?

bahhahahhaaaa


Rudy never had the laptop. the FBI does. where is their report proving it's Russian disinformation?


bahahhahhaaa


if the video from the security cameras showed anything that helped the kangaroo committee they'd have it on the evening news of every major outlet in the world. so why didn't they?


here's a thought .. what if it shows things they don't want known??

Just sayin'.

[Salty Again]

... Blimey! ... The Hill??

... Was THAT the noose from the "Hang Pence" gallows??

You lads DO know who brought the gallows there, don't you?
Ray Epps and his mates.

... Oh the places the Investigations WILL Go ...

#### Salty

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Maybe.

Stop right there.
Get back to us when you can have a declarative with proof backing it up.

Than narrow interpretations won't be needed.

BTW only looked at first link. What's the point about a bronze door when Ed Leedskalnin can move an object of 20 tons by himself?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Stop right there.
Get back to us when you can have a declarative with proof backing it up.

Than narrow interpretations won't be needed.

who opened the 17ft 10 ton door? from the inside?


there are only two possibilities. a protestor who somehow got in via some other way who just happened to know the code, or someone on the inside who knew the code.


thank you valued poster.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

who opened the 17ft 10 ton door? from the inside? ...

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Stop right there.
Get back to us when you can have a declarative with proof backing it up.

Than narrow interpretations won't be needed.

blah

Still waiting for you to straighten up that sloppy "maybe."

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Still waiting for you to straighten up that sloppy "maybe."

that was for your benefit, not mine.

let's apply Occam's Razor here ...

"the simplest explanation is preferable to one that is more complex"


so which is simplest? that some "dumb trumptard" somehow got in elsewhere, went to the 17ft multi-ton security door and somehow guessed the keycode and opened the door, or someone who already knew it opened it.


there is one indisputable fact, on video, someone opened a door you'd otherwise need an RPG to force open.


so who opened the door?


only the security video from the inside can answer that.


so let's see it.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

that was for your benefit, not mine. ...

No. *OUR* benefit is for you to not say "maybe" and bring proof *IF* the real time coverage of January 6 was orchestrated. Millions of people saw it happen.

Armchair obfuscation is still being put out. After 3 years, for example, no one from antifa was there in numbers. BLM didn't contibute to majority of arrest, etc.

Your post point was only to misdirect from the truth and rely on smoke and mirrors.

If you want credibility, throw out the interrogative and post a fact. Do so and what I said about having to lead a narration will be pointless.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

No. *OUR* benefit is for you to not say "maybe" and bring proof *IF* the real time coverage of January 6 was orchestrated. Millions of people saw it happen.

Armchair obfuscation is still being put out. After 3 years, for example, no one from antifa was there in numbers. BLM didn't contibute to majority of arrest, etc.

Your post point was only to misdirect from the truth and rely on smoke and mirrors.

If you want credibility, throw out the interrogative and post a fact. Do so and what I said about having to lead a narration will be pointless.

okay.


FACT: someone inside the building opened the door.


QUESTION: Who?


interrogative.. if the DC police and the committee have had this video for over two years now, and presumably reviewed it extensively, and if the video showed a "protestor" opening the door, one would presume it would have figured bigly in their report, yes?

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

*removed dancing around the issue content*

You still haven't addressed old business.
That will make your point clear, concise and precise.
I'll restate:

Originally Posted by Precious_b

No. *OUR* benefit is for you to not say "maybe" and bring proof *IF* the real time coverage of January 6 was orchestrated. Millions of people saw it happen.

Armchair obfuscation is still being put out. After 3 years, for example, no one from antifa was there in numbers. BLM didn't contibute to majority of arrest, etc.

Your post point was only to misdirect from the truth and rely on smoke and mirrors.

If you want credibility, throw out the interrogative and post a fact. Do so and what I said about having to lead a narration will be pointless.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

You still haven't addressed old business.
That will make your point clear, concise and precise.
I'll restate:

what old biz? that you posted that the live coverage was orchestrated? you missed the point. it's not the live coverage, it's the video showing the door being opened. so once again, was opening that security door to allow these protesters in orchestrated?


maybe.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

what old biz? ...
maybe.

Originally Posted by Precious_b

Stop right there.
Get back to us when you can have a declarative with proof backing it up.

Let me help you with that. Get rid of the "maybe" and supply proof it was orchestrated or say you are wrong saying "maybe".

Than narrow interpretations won't be needed.

...

.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Precious_b

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
what old biz? ...
maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Precious_b
Stop right there.
Get back to us when you can have a declarative with proof backing it up.

Let me help you with that. Get rid of the "maybe" and supply proof it was orchestrated or say you are wrong saying "maybe".

Than narrow interpretations won't be needed.

...

if you say so

[Precious_b]

So you can't state unequivocally that the live real time footage on the news networks was all staged.

Guess you are trying to make clickbait here by stating "maybe."

If your point is to generate $$$ for the site by clicks, like I do for some threads I don't care about, say so like me.