Still don't believe he's a muslim?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Odd, I didn't see him ridiculing Romney. Where do you see it? Link, please, as you are want to say. The man only has a hand full of posts so I am sure you can find where he ridiculed Romney, can't you? Just like you can find where you accused me of supporting cannibalism.

Sick, lying, Pharisee. You really better hope saint peter doesn't expect that you have lived your good book. You really are a walking, talking example of what Christ condemned. Hiding behind "the morals of the time" so you can justify all ills of slavery. Brushing aside as if it was a minor triviality the killing of millions, the taking of lands, the disregard of treaties. You know, minor commandments like killing, stealing, and lying.

You still haven't answered most the important questions i've asked you, but everyone knows you never will. But just for the record, which was the Spaniard's biggest sin in your mind: greed for gold, cutting off the feet of the men at Acoma, raping the Aztec women, or stealing the gold from the Incas? And whichever you choose, please justify your answer in terms a human can understand, not your typical doublespeak. I know it is a subjective question and your answer will be graded on how you defend your choice, not which answer you choose.

Typical IB the lying slave monger.

Odd, I didn't see where I accused DCBelching of ridiculing Romney for his religion, Old-THUMPER. Cite the link or admit you lied, Old-THUMPER.

And just for the record, Old-THUMPER, which was the Iroquois's biggest sin in your mind: making captives run the gauntlet composed of hundreds when brought to a village; cutting off the eyelids, ears, noses and genitals of their captives; slow roasting captives alive, for hours, at the stake; shoving burning coals into raw scalping wounds; cannibalizing their captives; enslaving their captives; raping the captive women, or stealing beaver pelts, children and women from neighboring tribes?

Typical, Old-THUMPER: the lying, slave mongering, trollish stalker.

... and the blood-thirsty Aztecs:

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by TGBeldin

When did religion become a criteria for being president? I'm sure a lot of people including you think it is supposed to be a WASP, preferably a Southern Baptist, but that is not required. The WASPs made up lies about Catholics when JFK ran. As recently as last election people trashed Romney because he was LDS. So I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you think a Muslim is completely unconstitutional. What mosque does he attend?

At least he isn't a Jew! Heaven forbid. If we allow a Jew, next thing you know some Hindu would think he actually has rights to run for office. Gasp! That is only one step from a following the teachings of Motzeyout. A clear sign of the end times if those beliefs were ever followed on this soil. [Sarcasm meter pegged out of course].

I think Obama has been a marginally competent president at best. I think we will suffer from things he has done for years to come. But impeaching him or changing your views because of what his spiritual beliefs might be is worse than anything he has done. Evaluate his actions, not his religion.

After the Ozombies and oLD-Trick elected a Muslim/communist WTF?

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

After the Ozombies and oLD-Trick elected a Muslim/communist WTF?

IIFFy, are you puppeting IB the hypocrit Pharisees? What a shock! The lap dog follows its master. There is one difference I guess: IB clearly lies. You we can't be sure since so many of your posts are completely unintelligible.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

IIFFy, are you puppeting IB the hypocrit Pharisees? What a shock! The lap dog follows its master. There is one difference I guess: IB clearly lies. You we can't be sure since so many of your posts are completely unintelligible.

You're the pathetic, lying, trollish stalker, Old-THUMPER.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Old-T

IIFFy, are you puppeting IB the hypocrit Pharisees? What a shock! The lap dog follows its master. There is one difference I guess: IB clearly lies. You we can't be sure since so many of your posts are completely unintelligible.

After the Ozombies and oLD-Trick elected a Muslim/communist WTF?

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're the pathetic, lying, trollish stalker, Old-THUMPER.

Good IBMassa', stick up for you lap dog. After all he is the only one who will stick up for you.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Good IBMassa', stick up for you lap dog. After all he is the only one who will stick up for you.

Cite where I accused DCBelching of ridiculing Romney for his religion, or admit you lied, Old-THUMPER.

And just for the record, Old-THUMPER, you didn't address these questions. Which was the Iroquois's biggest sin in your mind, Old-Thumper: making captives run the gauntlet composed of hundreds when brought to a village; cutting off the eyelids, ears, noses and genitals of their captives; slow roasting captives alive, for hours, at the stake; shoving burning coals into bleeding, scalping wounds; cannibalizing their captives; enslaving their captives; raping the captive women, or stealing beaver pelts, children and women from neighboring tribes?

Typical, Old-THUMPER, he's still the lying, slave mongering, trollish stalker he's always been.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by TGBeldin

When did religion become a criteria for being president? I'm sure a lot of people including you think it is supposed to be a WASP, preferably a Southern Baptist, but that is not required. The WASPs made up lies about Catholics when JFK ran. As recently as last election people trashed Romney because he was LDS. So I guess it shouldn't surprise me that you think a Muslim is completely unconstitutional. What mosque does he attend?

At least he isn't a Jew! Heaven forbid. If we allow a Jew, next thing you know some Hindu would think he actually has rights to run for office. Gasp! That is only one step from a following the teachings of Motzeyout. A clear sign of the end times if those beliefs were ever followed on this soil. [Sarcasm meter pegged out of course].

I think Obama has been a marginally competent president at best. I think we will suffer from things he has done for years to come. But impeaching him or changing your views because of what his spiritual beliefs might be is worse than anything he has done. Evaluate his actions, not his religion.

This is not about religion, this is about hiding your true religion. JFK was pretty up front about his religion and so have been all other presidents. The democratic party and the media just accepted this guy at face value despite red flags all through his life. Being the son of a Muslim (Muslim's trace their religion throught the father), growing up in Indonesia (going to a Muslim school for years), journeying to Pakistan (the Muslim part of the old India) without state department approval, hanging with terrorists, terrorist financial supporters, and some of his staffers are Muslim (but that is never mentioned when they are talked about), and a straight forward admission on the Skippy Steponallofus show.

So this is about more lying, deceit, and not trusing the American voters with the truth at the time we are involved in a war with Muslim terrorists.

You're making some awfully big accusations and you should either PROVE them beyond denial or stop and apologize for what you've done so far. In any event, get back to the democratic plantation that you've escaped from where they love the liars and the lies that they tell.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by Old-T

Odd, I didn't see him ridiculing Romney. Where do you see it? Link, please, as you are want to say. The man only has a hand full of posts so I am sure you can find where he ridiculed Romney, can't you? Just like you can find where you accused me of supporting cannibalism.

Sick, lying, Pharisee. You really better hope saint peter doesn't expect that you have lived your good book. You really are a walking, talking example of what Christ condemned. Hiding behind "the morals of the time" so you can justify all ills of slavery. Brushing aside as if it was a minor triviality the killing of millions, the taking of lands, the disregard of treaties. You know, minor commandments like killing, stealing, and lying.

You still haven't answered most the important questions i've asked you, but everyone knows you never will. But just for the record, which was the Spaniard's biggest sin in your mind: greed for gold, cutting off the feet of the men at Acoma, raping the Aztec women, or stealing the gold from the Incas? And whichever you choose, please justify your answer in terms a human can understand, not your typical doublespeak. I know it is a subjective question and your answer will be graded on how you defend your choice, not which answer you choose.

Typical IB the lying slave monger.

Don't go there OT...there was not one word written that accuser a poster of ridiculing Romney. The phrase was "ilk". That means (and you know this) that people like him ridiculed Romney's religion (and stlll do so). This kind of lying and misrepresentation is below you OT.

[Yssup Rider]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're the pathetic, lying, trollish stalker, Old-THUMPER.

How is he:

Pathetic?
Lying?
Trollish?
And a stalker?

That could very well be the greatest number untruths in a single seven word sentence.

But don't let that stop you, moron. Keep blathering, deflecting and hijacking threads to which you can make no contribution.

Like this one...

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Old-T

IIFFy, are you puppeting IB the hypocrit Pharisees? What a shock! The lap dog follows its master. There is one difference I guess: IB clearly lies. You we can't be sure since so many of your posts are completely unintelligible.

intelligible,yet? ... oLD-Trichinosis... the parasite... Ozombiejina boy

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Don't go there OT...there was not one word written that accuser a poster of ridiculing Romney. The phrase was "ilk". That means (and you know this) that people like him ridiculed Romney's religion (and stlll do so). This kind of lying and misrepresentation is below you OT.

My comment referred to post #72 by IB.

He stated, as you correctly point out, that people "of TGBeldin's ilk" were the ones ridiculing Romney. He then quoted another poster who seems a definite LW zealot and that third party making fun of Romney. So I take IB's point that TGB is of similar mind as the LW zealot.

I went back are reread TGB's post and honestly could not tell if he supported or opposed Romney, and what I was attacking IB about was IB's jumping to conclusions about TGB being anti-Romney.

I actually didn't mind many of Romney's points, but I did believe his outward projected stand-offishness and his obama care stand would hurt him. I don't know enough personally about him to say what kind of man he actually is. Honestly, I was surprised he lost--i thought the economy gave him more of an edge than it actually did. Everything I have heard indirectly about him says he is a decent man.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Old-T

My comment referred to post #72 by IB.

He stated, as you correctly point out, that people "of TGBeldin's ilk" were the ones ridiculing Romney. He then quoted another poster who seems a definite LW zealot and that third party making fun of Romney. So I take IB's point that TGB is of similar mind as the LW zealot.

I went back are reread TGB's post and honestly could not tell if he supported or opposed Romney, and what I was attacking IB about was IB's jumping to conclusions about TGB being anti-Romney.

I actually didn't mind many of Romney's points, but I did believe his outward projected stand-offishness and his obama care stand would hurt him. I don't know enough personally about him to say what kind of man he actually is. Honestly, I was surprised he lost--i thought the economy gave him more of an edge than it actually did. Everything I have heard indirectly about him says he is a decent man.

You were against him before you were against him... oLD-Tricanoasis (the parasite)...

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You were against him before you were against him..:

Deep, man. Really deep.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

How is he:

Pathetic?
Lying?
Trollish?
And a stalker?

That could very well be the greatest number untruths in a single seven word sentence.

But don't let that stop you, moron. Keep blathering, deflecting and hijacking threads to which you can make no contribution.

Like this one...

Originally Posted by Old-T

My comment referred to post #72 by IB.

He stated, as you correctly point out, that people "of TGBeldin's ilk" were the ones ridiculing Romney. He then quoted another poster who seems a definite LW zealot and that third party making fun of Romney. So I take IB's point that TGB is of similar mind as the LW zealot.

I went back are reread TGB's post and honestly could not tell if he supported or opposed Romney, and what I was attacking IB about was IB's jumping to conclusions about TGB being anti-Romney.

I actually didn't mind many of Romney's points, but I did believe his outward projected stand-offishness and his obama care stand would hurt him. I don't know enough personally about him to say what kind of man he actually is. Honestly, I was surprised he lost--i thought the economy gave him more of an edge than it actually did. Everything I have heard indirectly about him says he is a decent man.

DCBelching's prior posts in this forum, such as his remark addressing IIFFY in another thread, reeked of the same mendacious stench that all "#Grubered" lib-retards, such as yourself, give off, Old-THUMPER.