Racism or Freedom of Speach

[Hotrod511]

Originally Posted by hamscram(Ekim)

Are insults all you have now?
What was wrong with your lost handle?
How is your gay SO?

It's not a insult when it's true Ekim
what is it with you and yassup and gay's

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Your envy and your greed is revealed in your every argument.

And there's nothing "positive" about welcoming criminals willy-nilly into this country whose very first action is illegal and unlawful because they entered this country in violation of U.S. laws.

Anybody who advocates that "unlawful and illegal" is a "positive" over "lawful and legal" is a moron.

Greed and envy.....You sound like a vindictive member of the ex-wives club. Your ignorance and fear is revealed in your argument with every post you make. I do not advocate for unlawful or illegal immigration. Moreover, seeking asylum in the US is not illegal or a crime. Only a moron would operate on the assumption that all immigrants or individuals seeking asylum are criminals. I would wager those immigrants who are ultimately approved maintain higher standards of ethical conduct than key members of the current administration.

I support granting asylum to those individuals who have had their homes and lives destroyed by political corruption, narcoterrorism and American sponsored proxy wars in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Foreign nationals who have provided aid to the our military and intelligence community should receive priority in processing requests for asylum. I suggest you review the laws regarding the request for US asylum.

Furthermore, asylm normally cannot be initiated on foreign soil. Individuals seeking asylum from the American government must present themselves at a port of entry or a American diplomatic office in the US. An individual seeking asylum is typically categorized as undocumented until the request is denied or approved.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

If i have to explain it to you, it's not worth explaining to you.


BAHHAAAA

Perhaps the comment was not worth posting in the first place. Obviously, if one is not capable of explaining what they post then they probably have no idea what they are talking about.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Greed and envy.....You sound like a vindictive member of the ex-wives club. Your ignorance and fear is revealed in your argument with every post you make. I do not advocate for unlawful or illegal immigration. Moreover, seeking asylum in the US is not illegal or a crime. Only a moron would operate on the assumption that all immigrants or individuals seeking asylum are criminals. I would wager those immigrants who are ultimately approved maintain higher standards of ethical conduct than key members of the current administration.

I support granting asylum to those individuals who have had their homes and lives destroyed by political corruption, narcoterrorism and American sponsored proxy wars in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Foreign nationals who have provided aid to the our military and intelligence community should receive priority in processing requests for asylum. I suggest you review the laws regarding the request for US asylum.

Furthermore, asylm normally cannot be initiated on foreign soil. Individuals seeking asylum from the American government must present themselves at a port of entry or a American diplomatic office in the US. An individual seeking asylum is typically categorized as undocumented until the request is denied or approved.

You're lying. These illegals are trekking past multiple U.S. embassies where they can apply for asylum in accordance with U.S. laws and regulations. There are ten U.S. Embassies or Consulates in Mexico.

Entering this country contrary to U.S. immigration laws is ILLEGAL, and you are sure as fuck ignoring that CRIMINAL behavior by these ILLEGALS as you continue to encourage and defend unlawful behavior.

Maybe you should fucking check out the rebirth of the African slave trade in Libya courtesy of Odumbo and hildebeest before you start lecturing anyone on fucking "ethics".

[bb1961]

This is an A+++++++++++++++ in liberal psycho babble...
Did you write this TM??
https://news.yahoo.com/readers-write...-politics.html

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You're lying. These illegals are trekking past multiple U.S. embassies where they can apply for asylum in accordance with U.S. laws and rehulations.

Entering this country contrary to U.S. immigration laws is ILLEGAL, and you are sure as fuck ignoring that CRIMINAL behavior by these ILLEGALS as you continue to encourage and defend unlawful behavior.

Maybe you should fucking check out the rebirth of the African slave trade in Libya courtesy of Odumbo and hildebeest before you start lecturing anyone on fucking ethics".

Not only are you ignorant and rude but you have potty mouth as well. Hurling obscenities and bringing up the Libyan slave will not make your delusional argument creditable. If you start another thread and can manage to control your potty mouth I am prepared to discuss the Libyan slave....but only if you lose the potty mouth.

I am awesome but not perfect and do make mistakes. Please post that portion of the law, US Code, State Department or Homeland Secuity regulations that enables foreign nationals to apply for asylum at American diplomatic offices on foreign soil. I'll wait.

You do know that an open border is not congruent to "free immigration". Canada has one of the longest open borders running parellel to the American Northern border. Canada is not a welfare state.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by bb1961

This is an A+++++++++++++++ in liberal psycho babble...
Did you write this TM??
https://news.yahoo.com/readers-write...-politics.html

Y'all do know that Consulates are primarily concerned with business matters rather than diplomatic issues. Moreover, not all members of the Consulate staff are entitled to diplomatic immunity as with Embassies.

[the_real_Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Greed and envy.....You sound like a vindictive member of the ex-wives club. Your ignorance and fear is revealed in your argument with every post you make. I do not advocate for unlawful or illegal immigration. Moreover, seeking asylum in the US is not illegal or a crime. Only a moron would operate on the assumption that all immigrants or individuals seeking asylum are criminals. I would wager those immigrants who are ultimately approved maintain higher standards of ethical conduct than key members of the current administration.

I support granting asylum to those individuals who have had their homes and lives destroyed by political corruption, narcoterrorism and American sponsored proxy wars in Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Foreign nationals who have provided aid to the our military and intelligence community should receive priority in processing requests for asylum. I suggest you review the laws regarding the request for US asylum.

Furthermore, asylm normally cannot be initiated on foreign soil. Individuals seeking asylum from the American government must present themselves at a port of entry or a American diplomatic office in the US. An individual seeking asylum is typically categorized as undocumented until the request is denied or approved.

You make the assumption that every action taken by Trump is collusion or obstruction. Collusion is not a crime and can you obstruct a non crime. I wager that those under investigation display greater character than those doing the investigating. (That was fun)

How exactly do know that those people crossing the border are the salt of the earth? They have no rights here so the applied concept of better that one scumbag can come in so we don't deny ten good entry is invalid.

The people who have been helping us (whoever they are) are definitely not in the caravans. If that is your argument then what is your suggestion if we catch a known terrorist, rapist, murderer, or drug trafficker? Send em back to try again or should they look at the flowers?

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Y'all do know that Consulates are primarily concerned with business matters rather than diplomatic issues. Moreover, not all members of the Consulate staff are entitled to diplomatic immunity as with Embassies.

You obviously don't read this liberal nonsense...https://news.yahoo.com/readers-write...-politics.html

[bb1961]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You make the assumption that every action taken by Trump is collusion or obstruction. Collusion is not a crime and can you obstruct a non crime. I wager that those under investigation display greater character than those doing the investigating.

It's the inmates running the asylum...

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Perhaps the comment was not worth posting in the first place. Obviously, if one is not capable of explaining what they post then they probably have no idea what they are talking about.

If you say so.


BAHAHAAAAAAA

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

Not only are you ignorant and rude but you have potty mouth as well. Hurling obscenities and bringing up the Libyan slave will not make your delusional argument creditable. If you start another thread and can manage to control your potty mouth I am prepared to discuss the Libyan slave....but only if you lose the potty mouth.

I am awesome but not perfect and do make mistakes. Please post that portion of the law, US Code, State Department or Homeland Secuity regulations that enables foreign nationals to apply for asylum at American diplomatic offices on foreign soil. I'll wait.

You do know that an open border is not congruent to "free immigration". Canada has one of the longest open borders running parellel to the American Northern border. Canada is not a welfare state.

The rebirth of the Libyan slave trade is obviously an "ethical" argument you want to avoid as you continue to fantasize that hildebeest was without blemish. Your fantasy notion that she is or would be better than Trump is why your party lost. YOU brought up the subject of "ethics", and it was hildebeest's lack of ethics that was the fucking alternative in the 2016 election.

You're posting on a fucking hooker board; so, I'm not at all impressed that you feign to have "dainty ears" and pretend you've not heard these words before.

FYI, "Open Borders" is a short hand term referencing the uncontrolled access to the U.S. and is not dependent of the presence or absence of barriers.

Fact: your asylum seekers are just as disingenuous as you are. They lie as you lie. Only 2% of those from Mexico are found to be legitimate requests for asylum. U.S. law requires these so-called asylum seekers to apply for and obtain VISAs to enter the country legally or apply for asylum at ports of entry; yet, the multitude of these illegals trek right past those embassies and consulates and cross illegally into the U.S.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You make the assumption that every action taken by Trump is collusion or obstruction. Collusion is not a crime and can you obstruct a non crime. I wager that those under investigation display greater character than those doing the investigating. (That was fun)

How exactly do know that those people crossing the border are the salt of the earth? They have no rights here so the applied concept of better that one scumbag can come in so we don't deny ten good entry is invalid.

The people who have been helping us (whoever they are) are definitely not in the caravans. If that is your argument then what is your suggestion if we catch a known terrorist, rapist, murderer, or drug trafficker? Send em back to try again or should they look at the flowers?

I never said every action taken by 45 is collusion or obstruction. Those are your words not mine. While collusion is not a crime, obstruction of justice, racketeering-operating a criminal enterprise and treason are. If I am not mistaken in 1998 a sitting American President was impeached for abuse of office and obstruction of justice among other things.The rest of your statement makes no sense and does not warrent a response.

[Whisky_1]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The rebirth of the Libyan slave trade is obviously an "ethical" argument you want to avoid as you continue to fantasize that hildebeest was without blemish. Your fantasy notion that she is or would be better than Trump is why your party lost. YOU brought up the subject of "ethics", and it was hildebeest's lack of ethics that was the fucking alternative in the 2016 election.

You're posting on a fucking hooker board; so, I'm not at all impressed that you feign to have "dainty ears" and pretend you've not heard these words before.

FYI, "Open Borders" is a short hand term referencing the uncontrolled access to the U.S. and is not dependent of the presence or absence of barriers.

Fact: your asylum seekers are just as disingenuous as you are. They lie as you lie. Only 2% of those from Mexico are found to be legitimate requests for asylum. U.S. law requires these so-called asylum seekers to apply for and obtain VISAs to enter the country legally or apply for asylum at ports of entry; yet, the multitude of these illegals trek right past those embassies and consulates and cross illegally into the U.S.

I treat sex workers with respect and demand to be treated with respect in return. Secondly, I have no need to be disrespectful on a hooker board or anyplace else. I am interested in a collegial debate, not doing your homework or trading insults. You are just repeating opinion pieces and inaccurate emotional responses because you probably got nothing but hate and fear of change. I don't have anymore time to waste on your trumpery (pun intended).

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Whisky_1

I treat sex workers with respect and demand to be treated with respect in return. Secondly, I have no need to be disrespectful on a hooker board or anyplace else. I am interested in a collegial debate not doing your homework or trading insults. You are just repeating inaccurate emotional responses because probably got nothing but hate and fear of change. I don't have anymore time to waste on your trumpery (pun intended).

You haven't posted anything but bullshit since you started. Your opinions have been shot down with facts at every turn. Your opinion that you are intellectually superior to anyone else in this forum is equally faulty and without merit.