Quote:
Originally Posted by timothe
The impression I had was that RCS was not a provider on this board when that session happened and that she had seen him outside the hobby. Do you (or anyone) have information contrary to her claim?
|
Outside the hobby? Instead of playing a game of Clue to figure it out, why not simply ask RCS. Keep in mind that asking either party more details at this point, especially given the post by surfindick where the Staff looked into the initial claims of this thread of non-consensual, and found her to not be exactly 100% accurate or truthful so unpredictable results may occur if you check on the previous meetings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdog0311
You can post a review on a provider, whether she is a Eccie member or not, and sometimes guys will post reviews of girls they paid for sexual services, and maybe when RCS joined, then BBL may have thought, "perfect" and did his review. Maybe he did her a favor, maybe not, but from her original post, it looks like she regretted meeting the guy, it is a common thought among providers about this guy, but seemingly only after he posts a review with the pics to prove it.
|
Quite a bit of speculation there without a shred of facts.
"Maybe when RCS joined BBL thought to do her a favor?"
I may be alone in thinking this but I don't think that when BBL chose to write this review he thought of "doing her a favor". More like I'd wager his PA was about up and he needed another 6 weeks and RCS was a recent visit PLUS with the Lito, it fell right into his wheelhouse for outrageous sessions this site craves and survives o.
I am so confused by that paragraph because it is incomprehensible how you could possibly entertain a thought that BBL's thought process would even be in the same Zipcode as RCS.
Now, just how the hell would you know about some "common thought among providers about this guy"?
He has
a total of 5 reviews. Lizzie disappeared, Nina appears to be strictly Backpage and the number has different names attached, and then there is Gin. The review speaks for itself. but is she even around?
So, the
sum total of providers who may have some kind, in fact, any kind, of though about this guy is 3. A thought held by 3 individuals is not common, far from it. Please try to stop with embellishing replies, OK?
Wow. Now people are trying to make a distinction about whether RCS was on this board or not.
Seriously?
We have entire forums devoted to vagina vendors that are not on here. Sure, there are a lot of guys, myself included, who will mention the site and point out the free ads and ability to network with other providers for better and safer screening tips, but other than trying to derail this even further, who gives a shit and more important, why does it matter?
1. BBL somehow someway met and as confirmed by both parties, had a couple "dates" prior to the Lito session.
2. RCS was "alerted" to the extremely graphic review by her small legion of white knights who tried to convince her she had committed a deadly sin by seeing BBL.
3. As history has shown since ASPD died and ECCIE went from a smaller, tighter, more friendly place to what we have now, the number of people, men and women both, who scream out yelling and cursing that a graphic review such as this will kill the providers business, has increased yet the providers getting such reviews do very well.
The funny part about it is that Logan has been writing even more outrageously graphic reviews than this (I really miss "The Road to Hell" series! posted years back on ASPD) yet it seems some just can't get over his handle so go bonkers and work their brains into a tizzy making accusations and making shit up, sorry, embellishing, posts in reviews and threads.
There's a reason why certain clients get discounts when they see call to see providers who understand the cash value of a well written and graphic review. It's all about the Benjamins and the small discount to make sure certain clients show up and not go to plan B or C means increased income.
Everyone needs to bring their heads back to Earth and understand that no amount of complaining will change anything. Just like many others, I'd bet he never uses his handle to screen. (if providers screen at all, a whole different topic)