Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 280
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70796
biomed163334
Yssup Rider61040
gman4453297
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48679
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42781
CryptKicker37223
The_Waco_Kid37138
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2016, 11:12 PM   #76
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven..._9341258.html?
http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/e...e62786407.html
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-28-2016, 11:28 PM   #77
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default





Quote:
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider View Post
.
[/QUOTE]
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 07:32 AM   #78
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post






[/QUOTE]

i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 07:42 AM   #79
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post

.
As you go round and round in your little wheel, Little Ekim the Inbred Chimp, listen to your boy Biden as he lulls you back into the party fold.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 08:38 AM   #80
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/nom.../supreme-court



Keep running in circles hamster.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 08:50 AM   #81
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You'd be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel that hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Congress to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 11:35 AM   #82
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You'd be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel that hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Congress to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

You are the retarded chimpazoid who hasn't cited where the constitution states the people will vote on a SOCTUS nominee .Like the turtle wants. Keep on running hamster.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 11:44 AM   #83
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You are the retarded chimpazoid who hasn't cited where the constitution states the people will vote on a SOCTUS nominee .Like the turtle wants. Keep on running hamster.
You, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, would be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel becuase you're to fuckin' stupid to understand how it's the Senate that is responsible for confirming a judicial nominee, and you'd be the chicken-shit jackass who hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 11:48 AM   #84
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
You, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, would be the dumb jackass spinning your wheel becuase you're to fuckin' stupid to understand how it's the Senate that is responsible for confirming a judicial nominee, and you'd be the chicken-shit jackass who hasn't cited where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.

You are the chimpazoid parroting the same shit over, and over plus dodging the statement about people voting for the nominee.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 11:59 AM   #85
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post

You are the chimpazoid parroting the same shit over, and over plus dodging the statement about people voting for the nominee.
Repeating the facts to you until you thoroughly understand is necessary because you're such a fucking idiot, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. To meaningfully support your POV your stupid-ass has to cite where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Meanwhile, all of your bird brained posts with hamster wheels only serves to underscore your complete lack of intelligence and inability to substantively support your POV with irrefutable factual statements, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 02:22 PM   #86
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
Repeating the facts to you until you thoroughly understand is necessary because you're such a fucking idiot, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. To meaningfully support your POV your stupid-ass has to cite where in the Constitution it dictates or prescribes a timeline for Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp. Meanwhile, all of your bird brained posts with hamster wheels only serves to underscore your complete lack of intelligence and inability to substantively support your POV with irrefutable factual statements, Ekim the Inbred Chimp.
You have no facts, just parroting the same shit, because you are in a corner. There is a need for pics when dealing with a trumpazoid.


That is your problem chicken dick.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 02-29-2016, 08:23 PM   #87
I B Hankering
Valued Poster
 
I B Hankering's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
Encounters: 9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i'va biggen View Post
You have no facts, just parroting the same shit, because you are in a corner. There is a need for pics when dealing with a trumpazoid.


That is your problem chicken dick.
The substantive proof is where the Constitution states that the Senate must confirm a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, but it doesn't dictate or prescribe a timeline for the Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp ... as you so ignorantly insist.
I B Hankering is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 12:17 AM   #88
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering View Post
The substantive proof is where the Constitution states that the Senate must confirm a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp, but it doesn't dictate or prescribe a timeline for the Senate to follow when considering a judicial nominee, Ekim the Inbred Chimp ... as you so ignorantly insist.
Here are the two first articles that started your strawman rant, as you can see there never was a timeline stated, Now STFY and stand in your corner.
http://k2radio.com/u-w-law-prof-dela...rly-two-years/
http://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/...rt-nomination/

i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 01:55 AM   #89
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

"Independent" LittleEva always sides with Obama. Makes you wonder how "independent" he truly is.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 03-01-2016, 07:08 AM   #90
i'va biggen
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
Encounters: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
"Independent" LittleEva always sides with Obama. Makes you wonder how "independent" he truly is.
You are s fucking dumb as chicken dick.
i'va biggen is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved