Capitalism Has Failed—What Next?

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

https://www.investopedia.com/updates/usa-national-debt/


Production in modern corporation is synonymous with capitalism. Like any other system; feudalism, a monarchy, or socialism, it always has it's critics, champions and skeptics. The cynic that comes up the most is Karl Marks. He witnessed what Charles Dickens magnified.

Karl Marx

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Marx


In the midst of the Industrial Age, Western civilation was comfortable living off investments brought on by slaves. No labor cost. Just livestock. The need for it to be discussed is as great as it was disgusting. Why?

which slaves? the ones the African tribes conquered and sold off to get rid of them or some other slaves?

btw .. the above is a cold hard cost analysis .. can't feed them so sell them as cattle. 75% of all slaves were captured and sold by their own kind. now tell me again about the evil of capitalism?


The foundation of equality is freedom. Goods and services need a balance of ideas from not only those in charge, but those who provide them. When a select few convince the rest that what is good for the company is good for them, the whole have to live with the outcome. Except the masses were excluded from the decision making. De facto autocracy.

you think you are entitled to freedom? you are entitled to be born. from then on, you are on your own. the cries of the masses are mostly lame ass losers wanting gov gifts.


Dividends to shareholders, corporate bonuses and bailouts do not improve an economy that is turning to automation.
The cost of doing business is moving away from labor. Decisions are based on profit as opposed to reinvestment or research and development.

bullshit. any strong company reinvests and does r&d. IBM alone gets millions per year for just patent research.


https://www.techrepublic.com/article...h-open-source/

IBM makes millions off patents, but it could make billions with open source


More or less government does not matter. Private capitalism or state run enterprises keep the same structure. The value of labor should meet the cost of living. When workers produce a surplus over what he gets, it creates instability. How stable is the current boom?

No, the job should pay what it is worth. if it's not enough to "live on" then get a better job. this is how capitalism rewards those who work hard and punishes the lazy.

Do we have to go to war to recover? Or will the rhetoric just kick the can and never pick it up?

what do you call a 31 year old high school drop out working at Mickey D's for min wage and 35 hours a week?

BUM!!

BAHHAAAAAAAAAA

[rexdutchman]

^^ A SNOWFLAKE Ha Ha ,,
Venezuela, I hear its nice this time of year if you can find toilet paper or food.
Capitalism by its nature will only work by keeping out the Socialists , the poor fucking idiots of the world.

[eccieuser9500]

[Levianon17]

Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

How did your first Economics class go? Did ya take any notes?

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...saddam-hussein

In a letter marked “secret”, written on 19 August 1990, days after Saddam Hussein’s forces had invaded Kuwait, Clark wrote a private memo to Thatcher in which he described the expected response from the US and its allies as “unparalleled opportunity” for the Defence Export Services Organisation (now known as the DSO).

The issue of exports was clearly a sensitive issue for ministers, however. In one memo to Powell, William Waldegrave, minister of state for foreign and Commonwealth affairs, opposed the government’s decision to raise Saddam’s human rights abuses, saying that it provoked the inevitable question of “why did you go on doing so much business with him?”

[Muscleup]

Why do the Bernie Sanders' crowd focus on the multi-billionaires created by capitalism? That's promoting pure covetousness. Why not focus on the fact that the lowest of the low in a capitalistic society are better off than most of the rest of the world by a significant margin?



Capitalism is the reason the USA became the most powerful "super-power" within 200 years of its declared independence.



Bernie-Bros, pot-heads, millennial's, and other worthless freaks need to crawl back to their mother's basements.(and die)

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by Muscleup

Why do the Bernie Sanders' crowd focus on the multi-billionaires created by capitalism? That's promoting pure covetousness. Why not focus on the fact that the lowest of the low in a capitalistic society are better off than most of the rest of the world by a significant margin?

Better yet, why don't they focus on helping the lowest of the low instead of tearing down the capitalist multi-billionaires, who are engines of economic and jobs growth? Efficient government, including efficiently provided help for poor children and single mothers, and better school systems are what's needed. The fuckers need to get their heads out of their asses and make the country more equal by raising up the poor instead of making everyone poorer.

[bb1961]

What the uninformed left doesn't understand in Capitalism, wealth and opportunity are...CREATED.
In socialism it's just the...OPPOSITE.
Tiny you don't understand that the left relies on the needy to rely on them!!
The "BIG secret" is most of the left in power are VERY wealthy...and share VERY little of their wealth(hypocrisy at it's finest) ...they would rather bankrupt you with their compassion!!

[rexdutchman]

Yupper ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 1000% correct the Big Secret is they need us to keep there power on in the Basement

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Muscleup

Why do the Bernie Sanders['] crowd focus on the multi-billionaires created by capitalism?



Bernie-Bros, pot-heads, millennial[']s, and other worthless freaks need to crawl back to their mother's basements.(and die)

http://www.factlv.org/timeline.htm

&

[Hotrod511]

I agree

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Levianon17

I think you should move.

At least this guy thought I should just move.

[Tiny]

Originally Posted by bb1961

Tiny you don't understand that the left relies on the needy to rely on them!!

I do understand bb, if your constituency is the needy, you want them to remain needy. You don't want them to become prosperous because then they'll vote for the other guy.

[eccieuser9500]

Originally Posted by Tiny

Better yet, why don't they focus on helping the lowest of the low instead of tearing down the capitalist multi-billionaires, who are engines of economic and jobs growth? Efficient government, including efficiently provided help for poor children and single mothers, and better school systems are what's needed. The fuckers need to get their heads out of their asses and make the country more equal by raising up the poor instead of making everyone poorer.

[gnadfly]

Don't feed the troll.