Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!
Dorthy_Monroe's last points issued: an objective assessment.
test
Coed Discussions - DallasBoth male and female members can mingle and interact here. Let's keep these discussions on-topic, thought-provoking, and more importantly...entertaining!
You have committed a bannable infraction right here, in black and white, no way to get around it.
#16- Post about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden.
Yeah, that was the intent of this rule. You to come on and post your foreign shit that people find irritating and get mad that someone says you're not all there.
If that was a banable offense anyone that's referred to someone being BSC would be gone.
I'm not WKing Kitty but rather common sense and its application.
Nevermind. It is obvious you are not all there. I'm sorry I didn't realize I was dealing with someone with a mental psychosis.
I hope you get help.
Quote:
Originally Posted by KittyLamour
I am speculating about your MENTAL condition, not a MEDICAL condition.
From The American Heritage Dictionary:
psychosis n., pl. -ses. Severe mental disorder, with or without organic damage, characterized by deterioration of normal intellectual and social functioning and by partial or complete withdrawal from reality.
Topic, Dorthy was singled out of several who disregarded staff instructions, pointed, then subsequently banned. She was told to stop trolling and the issue of racial comments seems to be focus of the "trolling." Many, including KL, agree that Cuban on Tuesdays was not a racist comment.
He revealed festivals of her ban and infraction, and in turn another moderator-type gave us a modest peek behind the curtain which informed us that others who were warned were not pointed even when they too disregarded his instructions to stay on topic.
In addition, the warning given to stop trolling was not enforceable and and not representative of the owners intention for free-flowing community participation between adults who should be able to lick their own wounds and move on. This is not a daycare.
Furthermore, NYr should have been more patient if he were looking for an opportunity to point Dorthy. He could have done so with full backing of the guidelines.
It's toeing the line, just not sure which side of the line, but I'm not moderator. I say it is toeing the line because I see these types of comments all of the time. I don't know which ones actually get pointed. Perhaps she received a warning...dunno
psychosis n., pl. -ses. Severe mental disorder, with or without organic damage, characterized by deterioration of normal intellectual and social functioning and by partial or complete withdrawal from reality.
Topic, Dorthy was singled out of several who disregarded staff instructions, pointed, then subsequently banned. She was told to stop trolling and the issue of racial comments seems to be focus of the "trolling." Many, including KL, agree that Cuban on Tuesdays was not a racist comment.
He revealed festivals of her ban and infraction, and in turn another moderator-type gave us a modest peek behind the curtain which informed us that others who were warned were not pointed even when they too disregarded his instructions to stay on topic.
In addition, the warning given to stop trolling was not enforceable and and not representative of the owners intention for free-flowing community participation between adults who should be able to lick their own wounds and move on. This is not a daycare.
Furthermore, NYr should have been more patient if he were looking for an opportunity to point Dorthy. He could have done so with full backing of the guidelines.
Maybe if you say is 27 more times something will change.
Topic, Dorthy was singled out of several who disregarded staff instructions, pointed, then subsequently banned. She was told to stop trolling and the issue of racial comments seems to be focus of the "trolling." Many, including KL, agree that Cuban on Tuesdays was not a racist comment.
He revealed festivals of her ban and infraction, and in turn another moderator-type gave us a modest peek behind the curtain which informed us that others who were warned were not pointed even when they too disregarded his instructions to stay on topic.
In addition, the warning given to stop trolling was not enforceable and and not representative of the owners intention for free-flowing community participation between adults who should be able to lick their own wounds and move on. This is not a daycare.
Furthermore, NYr should have been more patient if he were looking for an opportunity to point Dorthy. He could have done so with full backing of the guidelines.
If that is the case, then what's the use of EG#6, which discourages thread-hijacking?
In most cases, trolling is simply that.
Don't believe everything that people post on this board, even if it's from someone proclaiming to be the "ECCIE Administrator Handbook".