Main Menu |
Most Favorited Images |
Recently Uploaded Images |
Most Liked Images |
Top Reviewers |
cockalatte |
650 |
MoneyManMatt |
490 |
Jon Bon |
400 |
Still Looking |
399 |
samcruz |
399 |
Harley Diablo |
377 |
honest_abe |
362 |
DFW_Ladies_Man |
313 |
Chung Tran |
288 |
lupegarland |
287 |
nicemusic |
285 |
Starscream66 |
282 |
You&Me |
281 |
George Spelvin |
270 |
sharkman29 |
256 |
|
Top Posters |
DallasRain | 70831 | biomed1 | 63764 | Yssup Rider | 61312 | gman44 | 53378 | LexusLover | 51038 | offshoredrilling | 48840 | WTF | 48267 | pyramider | 46370 | bambino | 43221 | The_Waco_Kid | 37431 | CryptKicker | 37231 | Mokoa | 36497 | Chung Tran | 36100 | Still Looking | 35944 | Mojojo | 33117 |
|
|
08-02-2012, 04:32 PM
|
#61
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
there never were any wmd's when Bush began his quest for the invasion. NEVER !
|
As stated above, that is not what you initially posted, CBJ7. And you still haven't explained why that "sophisticated equipment" did not detect, as you claim, any trace chemicals from the WMD Saddam DID manufacture and deploy against the Kurds and Iranians, CBJ7.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 04:43 PM
|
#62
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 04:55 PM
|
#63
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
|
How is a Washington Post article about Romney supposed to help your argument, CBJ7? You made three unsupportable and asinine posts. You also have been unable to explain why, as you claim, "sophisticated equipment" did not detect, as you claim, trace elements from WMD known to have been manufactured and used by Iraq.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 04:58 PM
|
#64
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Feb 9, 2010
Location: Here
Posts: 14,191
|
Romney rasing taxes is a direct impact of the expenses we paid related to the war in Iraq ..
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 09:06 PM
|
#65
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Mar 30, 2009
Location: Hwy 380 Revisited
Posts: 3,333
|
So, in yet another attempt to rewrite FACTS, the fact that these alleged WMDs were in Syria (need more proof on that, too - but let's not - for this conversation's sake - go there) means that they were ALSO in Iraq?
Good one!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 10:03 PM
|
#66
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 29, 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You claimed Iraq never had WMD, CBJ7. .
|
Seems like all of these chemical weapon attacks happened during the Reagan/Bush era. I wonder why they didn't invade Irak to rid Hussein from WMDs?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 10:05 PM
|
#67
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 4, 2010
Location: Stillwater, OK
Posts: 3,631
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
there never were any wmd's when Bush began his quest for the invasion. NEVER !
|
because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 10:42 PM
|
#68
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Aug 20, 2010
Location: From hotel to hotel
Posts: 9,058
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cptjohnstone
because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people
|
So assume for a moment that WMD was all shipped out of Iraq into Syria--doesn't that mean we invaded the barn after the horse was gone? At which point, why did we invade the barn?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-02-2012, 11:50 PM
|
#69
|
Lifetime Premium Access
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
|
Sounds like some want to keep invading countries until we find WMD's God damnit!
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 01:58 AM
|
#70
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jun 12, 2011
Location: Olathe
Posts: 16,815
|
CJ7 you can have your own opinion but not your own facts. Not one chemical weapon when we invaded? Not one? You do realize that tear gas is a chemical weapon? Want to retract your foolish statement and maybe we can forget that you ignore all those other stories that show you to be a fool.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 06:59 AM
|
#71
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ7
Romney rasing taxes is a direct impact of the expenses we paid related to the war in Iraq ..
|
Typical Dim response, CBJ7: when you are losing an argument, you change the subject.
Quote:
Originally Posted by icuminpeace
Seems like all of these chemical weapon attacks happened during the Reagan/Bush era. I wonder why they didn't invade Irak to rid Hussein from WMDs?
|
Seem to recall that Bush 41 DID invade Iraq. See @:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
So did Clinton. See @:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 07:16 AM
|
#72
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
|
Funny thing is, CBJ7, Romney hasn't raised ANY federal taxes - yet.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 08:19 AM
|
#73
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jan 20, 2011
Location: kansas
Posts: 28,773
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cptjohnstone
because were shipped to Syeria, very simple for most people
|
guess Syria must be a nuclear power by now then if they got Saddam's WMDS?
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 08:34 AM
|
#74
|
Account Disabled
Join Date: Jun 29, 2012
Location: Austin
Posts: 874
|
Seriously, your biased history says that Bush invaded Irak because Hussein was gassing people? I recall he invaded Irak in support of Kuwait. Throughout the 80's Hussein was gassing people and the Republican administration turned a blind eye to it. If they would have invaded Irak then they would have found the WMDs that the US government provided to them. By the way, Bush 41 didn't finish the job either. Saddam staying in power for another 12 years.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I B Hankering
|
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
08-03-2012, 08:46 AM
|
#75
|
Valued Poster
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: South of Chicago
Posts: 31,214
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by icuminpeace
Seriously, your biased history says that Bush invaded Irak because Hussein was gassing people? I recall he invaded Irak in support of Kuwait. Throughout the 80's Hussein was gassing people and the Republican administration turned a blind eye to it. If they would have invaded Irak then they would have found the WMDs that the US government provided to them. By the way, Bush 41 didn't finish the job either. Saddam staying in power for another 12 years.
|
Yes. You are correct. Bush 41 didn't finish the job: a tactical and strategic mistake remedied by Bush 43.
What? No remarks about Clinton's "Operation Desert Fox"? Talk about your "blind eye", ICUP.
|
|
Quote
| 1 user liked this post
|
|
AMPReviews.net |
Find Ladies |
Hot Women |
|