Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Sandbox - National
test
The Sandbox - National The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 282
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163644
Yssup Rider61248
gman4453346
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48800
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43221
The_Waco_Kid37399
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-08-2012, 10:29 AM   #61
MrGiz
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 11,947
Default

Fast Gunn. . . Slow Brain. . . Shoot First. . . Think Later
MrGiz is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 11:14 AM   #62
BigLouie
Valued Poster
 
BigLouie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 5, 2010
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,860
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGiz View Post
Excerpted from a piece by Lawrence Sellin, Ph.D. :


The battle line of the Second American Revolution has been drawn: expose Obama and the entire corrupt system protecting him will also be exposed.
And electing Mitt who is nothing more than the mouth piece for the richest 1% is the answer? Hardly.
BigLouie is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 11:18 AM   #63
MrGiz
BANNED
 
Join Date: Feb 9, 2015
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 11,947
Default

Agreed !
MrGiz is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 11:18 AM   #64
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,967
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nwarounder View Post
THH, the point of getting rid of them would not be so that they could learn what and how the same old crooks did business and repeat it. The point would be to have them dismantle all the stupid shit they have done and get out of our basements, bedrooms and checkbook. They don't need to know farm economics, oil economics, how to run teachers unions or gamble on green technologies with tax funded dollars, or how to succeed in wiping all the asses of every American's that won't do it for themselves, just to name a few. After eight years or so of undoing the stupidity, then the next wave of new guys could focus on undoing the rest of the mess.
Just to take an easy example, the Farm bill comes up for renewal every four years. This is the year. All manner of agricultural policy is up for fine tuning this year. House and Senate Agriculture committees spend hundreds of hours in hearings and members and staff put in thousands of hours making changes from previous bill in light of what has happened in past four years. It's not that controversial in partisan tem, no major changes this go 'round, but it's by it's very nature comprehensive, so it weighs in at about 1,000 pages. How is it that 1) anybody with no previous legislative experience will understand the history of each program, the data on their relative efficacy, and the various vested interests of the hundreds of interest groups he or she will hear from on the bill; 2) agricultural economics isn't a needed skill?
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 11:28 AM   #65
Whirlaway
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Here.
Posts: 13,781
Encounters: 28
Default

Newcomers "not understanding" the bill renewal; is a good indication that the program has grown too large, too complex, and is too entrenched with special interests. Simplify the bill, cut the entitlement, and eliminate as much as possible.

Cut the bill, cut the influence, cut the lawyers lobbying for their clients interest, return the power back to the citizens in the form of simple legislation that everyone can understand and anyone can adminster.

There is no "law of governance" that says highly complex laws, that the common man cannot understand or administer, are the best way to govern.
Whirlaway is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 12:29 PM   #66
nwarounder
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 30, 2010
Location: CO
Posts: 2,239
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
Just to take an easy example, the Farm bill comes up for renewal every four years. This is the year. All manner of agricultural policy is up for fine tuning this year. House and Senate Agriculture committees spend hundreds of hours in hearings and members and staff put in thousands of hours making changes from previous bill in light of what has happened in past four years. It's not that controversial in partisan tem, no major changes this go 'round, but it's by it's very nature comprehensive, so it weighs in at about 1,000 pages. How is it that 1) anybody with no previous legislative experience will understand the history of each program, the data on their relative efficacy, and the various vested interests of the hundreds of interest groups he or she will hear from on the bill; 2) agricultural economics isn't a needed skill?
You just keep proving my point. 1. If legislatures can't understand it, a farmer sure as hell can't understand it. Stop renewing the stupidity, repeal the previous stupidity, and don't create laws the average American cannot understand. If you can't make a law that the average American can read and understand, don't create the law or ammendment. For example, do all Americans know slavery is illegal? Do all Americans know women can vote? See now? It's not hard to create laws that the average American can understand. 2. NO, congress does not need agricultural economic skills, farmers do. Human beings have been growing, harvesting, and selling their crops 1,000's of years before America was even created. To make the argument that we now need greedy, corrupt politicians to tell humans how "to be a farmer" is merely a socialist's plea for existence.
nwarounder is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 12:33 PM   #67
Fast Gunn
Valued Poster
 
Fast Gunn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 7, 2010
Location: two steps ahead of the posse.
Posts: 5,356
Encounters: 31
Exclamation Farm Bill

Really, guys?

The Farm Bill? The fucking farm bill?

Couldn't you find something more interesting to discuss?

Maybe we could debate the distance between the white stripes on the federal highways.

. . . If we make the distance 1 3/4" farther apart we could save money and really make a dent on the Federal Budget!



Fast Gunn is offline   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 09:02 PM   #68
Texas Contrarian
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 29, 2009
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,341
Default A "Stealth Coup" -- What a Concept!

Just out of curiosity, I clicked on this thread to find out exactly what a "stealth coup" might entail!

But I think the guy whose piece appeared in the opening post is pretty much spot on.

This comment by TTH:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
OK. Take every incumbent and turn them out of office. The make up of the next Congress will be almost exactly the same...
...was answered by this set of comments by Doove:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doove View Post
While your post does make sense regarding the points you raised, i think the point of term limits is to allow for a system whereby the people in office are not so consumed with the idea of being re-elected.


You raised some interesting negatives, but the positives would be almost endless. It would eliminate the inherent advantage that incumbents have at election time, it would allow them to make the difficult decisions that they all seem so loathe to make, it would allow them to serve all their constituents as opposed to just the ones that vote heavily in elections, it would make pork less necessary, which would make approving everyone else's pork to get your own pork not so vital, it would go a long way towards decreasing the influence of moneyed interests, and on and on.


No system is going to be without it's own cons, but i've long thought that the positives would outweigh whatever the negatives might be.
I agree with the above -- and speaking of pork, might offer a few additional comments.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn View Post
Really, guys?

The Farm Bill? The fucking farm bill?

Couldn't you find something more interesting to discuss?

Maybe we could debate the distance between the white stripes on the federal highways.

. . . If we make the distance 1 3/4" farther apart we could save money and really make a dent on the Federal Budget!


Actually, the farm bill is pretty important -- mostly because it's larded up with pork and political payoffs to an even greater extent than almost all the other crap congress produces. Most of the largesse goes to corporate ag interests and people who are fairly well off, not to struggling family farmers just trying to avoid being kicked off their land. Political hacks in both parties cram through almost unbelieveable collections of wasteful projects in the name of the "farm bill."

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
Just to take an easy example, the Farm bill comes up for renewal every four years. This is the year. All manner of agricultural policy is up for fine tuning this year. House and Senate Agriculture committees spend hundreds of hours in hearings and members and staff put in thousands of hours making changes from previous bill in light of what has happened in past four years. It's not that controversial in partisan tem, no major changes this go 'round, but it's by it's very nature comprehensive, so it weighs in at about 1,000 pages. How is it that 1) anybody with no previous legislative experience will understand the history of each program, the data on their relative efficacy, and the various vested interests of the hundreds of interest groups he or she will hear from on the bill; 2) agricultural economics isn't a needed skill?
How is the "relative efficacy" of this massive collection of programs likely to be anything to get excited about when the whole damned thing is primarily a "crony capitalist shuffle" designed by moneyed interests and the lobbyists doing their bidding? And does anybody seriously think these clowns know very much about agricultural economics? (Or care about it, for that matter. There are votes to be bought and there's money to be raised!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
...It takes a lifetime to master the place. Do you really think that a bunch of newbies, no matter how well motivated, can really comprehend hundreds of pages of bills a week on subjects as diverse as farm economics, national security, air quality, foreign policy, taxation, etc. No in a million years.
even the brightest office holders with law degrees who are trained to read statutes can't do that...

Well, I think that sort of cuts to the heart of the problem.

Is anyone well served by the production of incomprehensible bills that no one really understands, and that are going to need to have a lot of the blanks filled in later? Look at Dodd-Frank, for example. Although it does virtually nothing about "too big to fail", the bill itself has been called "too big to succeed." It weighs in at about 2,300 pages. Glass-Steagall, by contrast, was about 37 pages.

Even lawyers representing community banks are having trouble figuring out what it says and how various rules are likely to be implemented. About the only thing that can be said for sure is that Dodd-Frank is a great "jobs program" for lawyers! (It's not so good for the smaller banks, though, and they're the ones who have traditionally serviced the small business sector.)

Additionally, it's expected to be some time before a decision will be forthcoming on how the associated "Volcker rule" will be applied. There are still debates on whether the recent JPMorgan fiasco involving the "London Whale" and Boaz Weinstein was a "legitimate", permitted "hedge" of a position, or a reckless bet which would violate any likely interpretation of the Volcker rule. The law and all the rules are so unclear that cases of this sort are likely to be litigated for many years. In other words, you'll see new trails blazed by lawyers trying to bamboozle juries made up primarily of people who are neither lawyers nor finance professionals. Great. Welcome to 21st century lawmaking!

Chris Dodd and Barney Frank are two prime examples of people who outlived their usefulness many years ago. Should we really embrace the idea of people staying in congress for fifty years?

Quote:
Originally Posted by nwarounder View Post
..Stop renewing the stupidity, repeal the previous stupidity, and don't create laws the average American cannot understand. If you can't make a law that the average American can read and understand, don't create the law or ammendment...
Word!

Transparency should be considered a virtue. Lawmakers should put proposed bills online at the earliest possible time, and they should be understandable by anyone with reasonably decent reading comprehension skills.

And don't even get me started on the tax code. What a fucking national embarrassment!
Texas Contrarian is online now   Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 10:20 PM   #69
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

Obama said transparency would be one of the touchstones of his administration. He lied. He also said bills would be posted online 3 days before a vote would be taken. He lied again. I think he just lies.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 12:52 AM   #70
TexTushHog
Professional Tush Hog.
 
TexTushHog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 27, 2009
Location: Here and there.
Posts: 8,967
Encounters: 7
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nwarounder View Post
You just keep proving my point. 1. If legislatures can't understand it, a farmer sure as hell can't understand it. Stop renewing the stupidity, repeal the previous stupidity, and don't create laws the average American cannot understand. If you can't make a law that the average American can read and understand, don't create the law or ammendment. For example, do all Americans know slavery is illegal? Do all Americans know women can vote? See now? It's not hard to create laws that the average American can understand. 2. NO, congress does not need agricultural economic skills, farmers do. Human beings have been growing, harvesting, and selling their crops 1,000's of years before America was even created. To make the argument that we now need greedy, corrupt politicians to tell humans how "to be a farmer" is merely a socialist's plea for existence.
I'd love to see you write a bill to regulate the nuclear energy industry, or pesticides. You have no idea how technical most bills are and have to be.

And the average American can no more read even a simple statute than a pig can sing an opera. And 98% of the topic on which legislation is needed cannot be dealt with in a manner in which a simple statue will suffice.

Here is a regulation on shoving railroad cars that plays a vital role in railroad worker safety. The requirement for a man on the point when shoving is also for public safety. The reg is passed pursuant to authority delegated by Congress and with input from workers unions and employers. Tell me again how a regulation like this can be passed by a bunch of ignorant laymen with no technical knowledge?



§ 218.99 Shoving or pushing movements.

(a)(1) Each railroad shall adopt and comply with an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section. When any person including, but not limited to, each railroad, railroad officer, supervisor, and employee violates any requirement of an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section, that person shall be considered to have violated the requirements of this section. (2) The following requirements for shoving or pushing movements do not apply to rolling equipment intentionally shoved or pushed to permit the rolling equipment to roll without power attached, i.e., free rolling equipment, during switching activities known as kicking, humping, or dropping cars.
(b) General movement requirements —(1) Job briefing. Rolling equipment shall not be shoved or pushed until the locomotive engineer participating in the move has been briefed by the employee who will direct the move. The job briefing shall include the means of communication to be used between the locomotive engineer and the employee directing the move and how point protection will be provided.
(2) No unrelated tasks. During the shoving or pushing movement, the employee directing the movement shall not engage in any task unrelated to the oversight of the shoving or pushing movement.
(3) Point protection. When rolling equipment or a lite locomotive consist is shoved or pushed, point protection shall be provided by a crewmember or other qualified employee by:
(i) Visually determining that the track is clear. The determination that the track is clear may be made with the aid of monitored cameras or other technological means, provided that it and the procedures for use provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a direct visual determination by a crewmember or other qualified employee properly positioned to make the observation as prescribed in this section and appendix D to this part; and
(ii) Giving signals or instructions necessary to control the movement.
(c) Additional requirements for remote control movements. All remote control movements are considered shoving or pushing movements, except when the remote control operator controlling the movement is riding the leading end of the leading locomotive in a position to visually determine conditions in the direction of movement. In addition to the other requirements of this section,
(1) When initiating a remote control shoving or pushing movement:
(i) The remote control operator shall visually determine the direction the equipment moves; or
(ii) A member of the crew shall visually determine the direction the equipment moves and confirm the direction with the remote control operator. If no confirmation is received, the movement shall be immediately stopped; and
(2) If technology is relied upon, whether primarily or as a safeguard, to provide pull-out protection by preventing the movement from exceeding the limits of a remote control zone, the technology shall be demonstrated
(i) To be failsafe; or
(ii) To provide suitable redundancy to prevent unsafe failure.
(d) Remote control zone, exception to track is clear requirements. After an initial track is clear determination has been made in an activated remote control zone, it is not necessary to make a new determination prior to each subsequent shoving or pushing movement provided that:
(1) The controlling locomotive of the remote control movement is on the leading end in the direction of movement, i.e., the movement occurs on the pull-out end;
(2) The remote control zone is not jointly occupied; and
(3) The initial determination was made by a crewmember of either:
(i) The remote control crew;
(ii) A relieved remote control crew who has transferred the remote control zone directly to the relieving crew; or
(iii) The last jointly occupying crew who directly communicates, i.e., not through a third party, to a remote control crewmember that the remote control zone is no longer jointly occupied and meets the requirements for track is clear.
(e) Operational exceptions. A railroad does not need to comply with paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section in the following circumstances:
(1) Push-pull operations when operated from the leading end in the direction of movement, i.e., push mode;
(2) Shoving or pushing operations with manned helper locomotives or distributed power locomotives assisting a train when the train is being operated from the leading end in the direction of movement;
(3) During the performance of roadway maintenance activity under the direct control of a roadway worker performing work in accordance with railroad operating rules specific to roadway workers; or
(4) When the leading end of a shoving movement is on a main track or signaled siding, under the following conditions:
(i) The train dispatcher gives authority or permission to make the movement and verifies that:
(A) Another movement or work authority is not in effect within the same or overlapping limits unless conflicting movements are protected; and
(B) A main track is not removed from service by a work authority within the same or overlapping limits;
(ii) Movement is limited to the train's authority;
(iii) Movement shall not be made into or within yard limits, restricted limits, drawbridges, or work authority limits;
(iv) Movement shall not enter or foul a highway-rail grade crossing or pedestrian crossing except when:
(A) Crossing gates are in the fully lowered position; or
(B) A designated and qualified employee is stationed at the crossing and has the ability to communicate with trains; or
(C) At crossings equipped only with flashing lights or passive warning devices, when it is clearly seen that no traffic is approaching or stopped at the crossing and the leading end of the movement over the crossing does not exceed 15 miles per hour; and
(v) Movement shall not be made into or within interlocking limits or controlled point limits unless the following conditions are met:
(A) The signal governing movement is more favorable than restricting aspect;
(B) Each signal governing movement into and through interlocking limits or controlled point limits shall be continuously observed by a member of that crew who is in a position to determine that the train's movement has occupied the circuit controlling that signal as evidenced by that signal assuming its most restrictive aspect; and
(C) The movement does not exceed the train's length.
(5) Shoving or pushing movements made in the direction of the circuited end of a designated departure track equipped with a shove light system, if all of the following conditions are met:
(i) The shove light system is demonstrated to be failsafe;
(ii) The shove light system is arranged to display a less favorable aspect when the circuited section of the track is occupied;
(iii) Written procedures are adopted and complied with that provide for a reliable means of determining track occupancy prior to commencing a shoving or pushing movement;
(iv) The track is designated in writing;
(v) The track is under the exclusive and continuous control of a yardmaster or other qualified employee;
(vi) The train crewmember or other qualified employee directing the shoving or pushing movement complies with the general movement requirements contained in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section;
(vii) All remote control shoving or pushing movements comply with the requirements contained in paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and
(viii) The shove light system is continuously illuminated when the circuited section of the track is unoccupied.
[73 FR 8498, Feb. 13, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 33902, June 16, 2008]
TexTushHog is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 12:59 AM   #71
CuteOldGuy
Valued Poster
 
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 20, 2010
Location: Wichita
Posts: 28,730
Encounters: 20
Default

TTH, I don't think members of Congress write these things. They are written by career bureaucrats anyway.
CuteOldGuy is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 01:37 AM   #72
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whirlaway View Post
I don't understand the doomsdayers; things are bad and will get worse if Obama is re-elected. But to think you are going to replace what we have in some single event, some revolution (in the minds and streets) is childish.

It ain't gonn happen. And if revolution comes it will look more like the French Revolution than the revolution led by the American colonies.

Until you can articulate a more plausible course of action, you are just blowing smoke.
All right, who hijacked whirly's handle. This comment is too reasonable and makes too much sense.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 01:41 AM   #73
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
Obama said transparency would be one of the touchstones of his administration. He lied. He also said bills would be posted online 3 days before a vote would be taken. He lied again. I think he just lies.
Using the criteria that you use for determining if Obama has lied or not makes you the most consistent liar on this board.

Easily.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 02:00 AM   #74
Munchmasterman
Valued Poster
 
Munchmasterman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 3, 2011
Location: Out of a suitcase
Posts: 6,233
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
I'd love to see you write a bill to regulate the nuclear energy industry, or pesticides. You have no idea how technical most bills are and have to be.

And the average American can no more read even a simple statute than a pig can sing an opera. And 98% of the topic on which legislation is needed cannot be dealt with in a manner in which a simple statue will suffice.

Here is a regulation on shoving railroad cars that plays a vital role in railroad worker safety. The requirement for a man on the point when shoving is also for public safety. The reg is passed pursuant to authority delegated by Congress and with input from workers unions and employers. Tell me again how a regulation like this can be passed by a bunch of ignorant laymen with no technical knowledge?



§ 218.99 Shoving or pushing movements.

(a)(1) Each railroad shall adopt and comply with an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section. When any person including, but not limited to, each railroad, railroad officer, supervisor, and employee violates any requirement of an operating rule which complies with the requirements of this section, that person shall be considered to have violated the requirements of this section. (2) The following requirements for shoving or pushing movements do not apply to rolling equipment intentionally shoved or pushed to permit the rolling equipment to roll without power attached, i.e., free rolling equipment, during switching activities known as kicking, humping, or dropping cars.
(b) General movement requirements —(1) Job briefing. Rolling equipment shall not be shoved or pushed until the locomotive engineer participating in the move has been briefed by the employee who will direct the move. The job briefing shall include the means of communication to be used between the locomotive engineer and the employee directing the move and how point protection will be provided.
(2) No unrelated tasks. During the shoving or pushing movement, the employee directing the movement shall not engage in any task unrelated to the oversight of the shoving or pushing movement.
(3) Point protection. When rolling equipment or a lite locomotive consist is shoved or pushed, point protection shall be provided by a crewmember or other qualified employee by:
(i) Visually determining that the track is clear. The determination that the track is clear may be made with the aid of monitored cameras or other technological means, provided that it and the procedures for use provide an equivalent level of protection to that of a direct visual determination by a crewmember or other qualified employee properly positioned to make the observation as prescribed in this section and appendix D to this part; and
(ii) Giving signals or instructions necessary to control the movement.
(c) Additional requirements for remote control movements. All remote control movements are considered shoving or pushing movements, except when the remote control operator controlling the movement is riding the leading end of the leading locomotive in a position to visually determine conditions in the direction of movement. In addition to the other requirements of this section,
(1) When initiating a remote control shoving or pushing movement:
(i) The remote control operator shall visually determine the direction the equipment moves; or
(ii) A member of the crew shall visually determine the direction the equipment moves and confirm the direction with the remote control operator. If no confirmation is received, the movement shall be immediately stopped; and
(2) If technology is relied upon, whether primarily or as a safeguard, to provide pull-out protection by preventing the movement from exceeding the limits of a remote control zone, the technology shall be demonstrated
(i) To be failsafe; or
(ii) To provide suitable redundancy to prevent unsafe failure.
(d) Remote control zone, exception to track is clear requirements. After an initial track is clear determination has been made in an activated remote control zone, it is not necessary to make a new determination prior to each subsequent shoving or pushing movement provided that:
(1) The controlling locomotive of the remote control movement is on the leading end in the direction of movement, i.e., the movement occurs on the pull-out end;
(2) The remote control zone is not jointly occupied; and
(3) The initial determination was made by a crewmember of either:
(i) The remote control crew;
(ii) A relieved remote control crew who has transferred the remote control zone directly to the relieving crew; or
(iii) The last jointly occupying crew who directly communicates, i.e., not through a third party, to a remote control crewmember that the remote control zone is no longer jointly occupied and meets the requirements for track is clear.
(e) Operational exceptions. A railroad does not need to comply with paragraphs (b) through (d) of this section in the following circumstances:
(1) Push-pull operations when operated from the leading end in the direction of movement, i.e., push mode;
(2) Shoving or pushing operations with manned helper locomotives or distributed power locomotives assisting a train when the train is being operated from the leading end in the direction of movement;
(3) During the performance of roadway maintenance activity under the direct control of a roadway worker performing work in accordance with railroad operating rules specific to roadway workers; or
(4) When the leading end of a shoving movement is on a main track or signaled siding, under the following conditions:
(i) The train dispatcher gives authority or permission to make the movement and verifies that:
(A) Another movement or work authority is not in effect within the same or overlapping limits unless conflicting movements are protected; and
(B) A main track is not removed from service by a work authority within the same or overlapping limits;
(ii) Movement is limited to the train's authority;
(iii) Movement shall not be made into or within yard limits, restricted limits, drawbridges, or work authority limits;
(iv) Movement shall not enter or foul a highway-rail grade crossing or pedestrian crossing except when:
(A) Crossing gates are in the fully lowered position; or
(B) A designated and qualified employee is stationed at the crossing and has the ability to communicate with trains; or
(C) At crossings equipped only with flashing lights or passive warning devices, when it is clearly seen that no traffic is approaching or stopped at the crossing and the leading end of the movement over the crossing does not exceed 15 miles per hour; and
(v) Movement shall not be made into or within interlocking limits or controlled point limits unless the following conditions are met:
(A) The signal governing movement is more favorable than restricting aspect;
(B) Each signal governing movement into and through interlocking limits or controlled point limits shall be continuously observed by a member of that crew who is in a position to determine that the train's movement has occupied the circuit controlling that signal as evidenced by that signal assuming its most restrictive aspect; and
(C) The movement does not exceed the train's length.
(5) Shoving or pushing movements made in the direction of the circuited end of a designated departure track equipped with a shove light system, if all of the following conditions are met:
(i) The shove light system is demonstrated to be failsafe;
(ii) The shove light system is arranged to display a less favorable aspect when the circuited section of the track is occupied;
(iii) Written procedures are adopted and complied with that provide for a reliable means of determining track occupancy prior to commencing a shoving or pushing movement;
(iv) The track is designated in writing;
(v) The track is under the exclusive and continuous control of a yardmaster or other qualified employee;
(vi) The train crewmember or other qualified employee directing the shoving or pushing movement complies with the general movement requirements contained in paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2) of this section;
(vii) All remote control shoving or pushing movements comply with the requirements contained in paragraph (c)(1) of this section; and
(viii) The shove light system is continuously illuminated when the circuited section of the track is unoccupied.
[73 FR 8498, Feb. 13, 2008, as amended at 73 FR 33902, June 16, 2008]
Thank you for saying something that has been said hundreds of times but still ignored or misunderstood by our mostly self-proclaimed visionaries and least astute members of this board.
The second a bill becomes law (and actually well before) there are thousands of attorneys looking for loopholes that can be exploited. They are not written the way they are to confuse things. They are written the way they are so that they perform the task they were written to perform.
A good example is the 2700+ page Obamacare bill. Without taking the time to explain things to our moronic brethren, other than saying lawyers write the bills so that lawyers don't get around the bills, notice the Supreme (5 of them) Court (I should say their clerks) read all 2700+ pages and didn't find any loop-holes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy View Post
TTH, I don't think members of Congress write these things. They are written by career bureaucrats anyway.
Duh! And luckily.
Munchmasterman is offline   Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 02:31 AM   #75
gnadfly
Account Disabled
 
Join Date: Jan 20, 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 14,460
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexTushHog View Post
I'd love to see you write a bill to regulate the nuclear energy industry...]
Are the bills written organically by the legislators or by bureaucrats at the NRC?

You sound like a lawyer trying to justify his fee.
gnadfly is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved