Man, you Chump idiots picked a real "winner" e.g. "loser"

[texastoast]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Yet, 74 million people voted for him. Sorry Speed, but Biden is not up to the task of governing this country. It's too divided for him.

Trump is a LOSER. why don't y'all red neck conservapricks understand that?

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Hey due to Trump - I'm way richer than you - I've seen that run down place where you live. Maybe with Biden you can get a new place but I doubt it

And still no one is claiming the $1,000,000 reward.
Ima beginning to doubt your claims on monetary possessions.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

Ha! Libturds crack me up.

{staff edit- CK-- image violation}

OMG!
Is ECCIE taking a page from Twitter and docking non-factual post on this site?

trump succeeded in one thing of late.
I give him credit for the turn out for 2020 election.
But the popular and electoral winner was Biden.
*pb waits for the more whining/less proof faction of this site to comment*

[PythonLeeJackson]

F2E1A625-B90F-4FC7-91A6-4820049CF809.jpeg


Your fearless leader still looking for you to donate.

Come on suckers, don’t disappoint your master

[Precious_b]

Woot! #TeamCheatoe picking up a few points. Can he do it? The viewers are spellbound!

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by PythonLeeJackson

Attachment 874322


Your fearless leader still looking for you to donate.

Come on suckers, don’t disappoint your master

I can't believe ellen left her sweetie hanging in the wind like that. She could have made 200 separate donations with that cool million the LtGov was offering to pad #TeamCheatoes account.

With friends like ellen, who needs enemies?
*pb shakes head that she sailed him down the river without a paddle*

[Yssup Rider]

Under Trump,

Republican Party loses White House
Republican Party loses Senate
Republican Party loses House

Trump impeached a second time.

Winning yet?

[stikiwikit]

Something to chew on: especially for the current crop of so called "senators": The failure to convict DT is sending a message to future presidents that behavior like his, especially essentially endorsing the invasion of the United States Capitol, with the possible intent of murdering ( hang mike spence) or harming elected representatives, is tolerated and will not be punished. They need to remember that the next time something like this happens it might not be "their guy" who is behind it but someone everyone hates. But that person, should they ever exist, has precedence on their side.


Also, by the failure to call DT into account, broadens the scope of political power given to the executive branch over the legislative branches. Those senators are possibly reducing their own power as defined by the constitution a maybe guilty of a semi treasonous act.


Think about it and write to your senator, except for the less than human being TC.

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by stikiwikit

Something to chew on: especially for the current crop of so called "senators": The failure to convict DT is sending a message to future presidents that behavior like his, especially essentially endorsing the invasion of the United States Capitol, with the possible intent of murdering ( hang mike spence) or harming elected representatives, is tolerated and will not be punished. They need to remember that the next time something like this happens it might not be "their guy" who is behind it but someone everyone hates. But that person, should they ever exist, has precedence on their side.


Also, by the failure to call DT into account, broadens the scope of political power given to the executive branch over the legislative branches. Those senators are possibly reducing their own power as defined by the constitution a maybe guilty of a semi treasonous act.


Think about it and write to your senator, except for the less than human being TC.

The Glove dont fit! So gotta acquit

[winn dixie]

Originally Posted by stikiwikit

Something to chew on: especially for the current crop of so called "senators": The failure to convict DT is sending a message to future presidents that behavior like his, especially essentially endorsing the invasion of the United States Capitol, with the possible intent of murdering ( hang mike spence) or harming elected representatives, is tolerated and will not be punished. They need to remember that the next time something like this happens it might not be "their guy" who is behind it but someone everyone hates. But that person, should they ever exist, has precedence on their side.


Also, by the failure to call DT into account, broadens the scope of political power given to the executive branch over the legislative branches. Those senators are possibly reducing their own power as defined by the constitution a maybe guilty of a semi treasonous act.


Think about it and write to your senator, except for the less than human being TC.

Do not pm me again

[CryptKicker]

Originally Posted by stikiwikit

Something to chew on: especially for the current crop of so called "senators": The failure to convict DT is sending a message to future presidents that behavior like his, especially essentially endorsing the invasion of the United States Capitol, with the possible intent of murdering ( hang mike spence) or harming elected representatives, is tolerated and will not be punished. They need to remember that the next time something like this happens it might not be "their guy" who is behind it but someone everyone hates. But that person, should they ever exist, has precedence on their side.


Also, by the failure to call DT into account, broadens the scope of political power given to the executive branch over the legislative branches. Those senators are possibly reducing their own power as defined by the constitution a maybe guilty of a semi treasonous act.


Think about it and write to your senator, except for the less than human being TC.

The Constitution only allows for impeachment of current office holders. Not of private citizens. That would be one of the main reasons that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is not presiding over this. If people feel strongly enough about this then charges can be brought in criminal court or sued in civil court.

[Precious_b]

Originally Posted by winn dixie

Do not pm me again

I hate it when that happen. I always tell them to post what they wrote in public, unless it is something that needs to be done off the thread.

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

The Constitution only allows for impeachment of current office holders. Not of private citizens. That would be one of the main reasons that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is not presiding over this. If people feel strongly enough about this then charges can be brought in criminal court or sued in civil court.

I have no experience in Constitutional law but the wording of "current office holders" is not there. And hence one sticky detail.

“The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

That is a debatable term. But there is precedence with William Belknap since he was already out of office.

[CryptKicker]

Doesn't mean it was constitutional and he was aquitted: U.S. Senate: War Secretary's Impeachment Trial
https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory...ment_Trial.htm

[winn dixie]

All this is kinda moot. The 60 votes they need arent there.

[CryptKicker]

It's actually 67 votes and no, they are not there but the democratic senate is going to waste time and money putting on this dog and pony show.