Think before you Ink

[RideFreeInTexas]

Tattoos have been around for thousands of years. However, the idea that they are taboo is relatively recent. You stick-up-the-ass guys that think it's desecration of the body must not be getting much pussy because 99.9% of girls have them these days. Oh wait, or do you perhaps just come here to bitch about it and then bite your tongue while you fuck a tatted up babe?

[Guido2010]

+1 RideFree

[DangedDragon]

It's sad that so many people have taken to the habit of carving out the purity of paper with ink....

The poor ceiling of the Sistine Chapel's purity was destroyed by that evil artist Michelangelo.

It may be equally sad that we desecrate the purity of the computer screen with poorly thought out ideas, too.

[JayceeRivers]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

Your friends say it’s attractive and cool, but…….. Imagine your grandkids asking their Mom/Dad: “Why does grandma have…eyeballs printed on her breasts?; barbed wire around her ankle?; some guy’s name that’s not grandpa on her neck? Imagine your sister’s or brother’s kid’s asking them: “Why does Aunt Jane always wear long sleeves?” Imagine your kid(s) asking you: “Why don’t the other mothers in my (high school) graduating class have tattoos, I thought you said it was common when you were young?”

Now, I’m going to take a lot of flak for this from all the “hobbyists” that will defend your right and/or accuse me of just being old school and try to run me off the board defending their ATF, etc. But, if you can get access, read the ROS’s of as many reviews as you can find and you’ll get the true picture, usually with no BS. I have yet to find one review that says – “go see this girl, she’s got great tattoos”. What you will see, included in the vast majority of reviews – “a few tats, but nothing too distracting” – does that sound like a compliment?

Body ink does not make you (or Angelina) more attractive, it’s a distraction from your real beauty. If this post stops one beautiful woman from turning herself into a billboard, it was worth all the crap I’m going to take for voicing my opinion.

I have not a single tattoo on my body. However I profess this post makes me desire one. Blatant judgment of other peoples choices of expression is wrong no matter what occupation or reason. Provided the expresser is harming no one in their quest for individuality they have the right to tattoo and pierce and yes even brand their own flesh to their hearts content. If they should, later in life, regret their choice it is THEIR lesson and THEIR own personal epiphany not anyone else's to give or take. To you these are simple marring of the flesh that will degrade value and later become a regret. To the tattooed man or woman it is an expression, later in life it is a memory. How an artist chooses their canvas is personal. Judging someone aggressively and condescendingly will not achieve your goal. If you preferred women who are untattooed in the business book dates with them (I am absolutely not offering my services at all. In fact I would at all costs avoid you like the plague.)

Without variety of choice there is no variety at all. Should the next gentleman state that long hair is more attractive so no woman in the business should cut it? How will she, after all, feel when she is mistaken for a boy? How will her CHILDREN feel when people assume she is a lesbian? (disclaimer my hair is short this is simply an exaggerated example and slight sarcasm)

It is impossible for "all" to adhere to every demand and preference. Even if it was possible they should not have to adhere.

You, my confused friend, have likely caused more women to run out and tattoo themselves than you have saved from the ink you so evidently dislike.

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by DangedDragon

It's sad that so many people have taken to the habit of carving out the purity of paper with ink....

The poor ceiling of the Sistine Chapel's purity was destroyed by that evil artist Michelangelo.

It may be equally sad that we desecrate the purity of the computer screen with poorly thought out ideas, too.

Great post!!!!!!

[Guest043022]

Originally Posted by JayceeRivers

I have not a single tattoo on my body. However I profess this post makes me desire one. Blatant judgment of other peoples choices of expression is wrong no matter what occupation or reason. Provided the expresser is harming no one in their quest for individuality they have the right to tattoo and pierce and yes even brand their own flesh to their hearts content. If they should, later in life, regret their choice it is THEIR lesson and THEIR own personal epiphany not anyone else's to give or take. To you these are simple marring of the flesh that will degrade value and later become a regret. To the tattooed man or woman it is an expression, later in life it is a memory. How an artist chooses their canvas is personal. Judging someone aggressively and condescendingly will not achieve your goal. If you preferred women who are untattooed in the business book dates with them (I am absolutely not offering my services at all. In fact I would at all costs avoid you like the plague.)

Without variety of choice there is no variety at all. Should the next gentleman state that long hair is more attractive so no woman in the business should cut it? How will she, after all, feel when she is mistaken for a boy? How will her CHILDREN feel when people assume she is a lesbian? (disclaimer my hair is short this is simply an exaggerated example and slight sarcasm)

It is impossible for "all" to adhere to every demand and preference. Even if it was possible they should not have to adhere.

You, my confused friend, have likely caused more women to run out and tattoo themselves than you have saved from the ink you so evidently dislike.

This is one of the best replies in this thread,you are an intelligent young woman Jaycee!!

[Bijou Neko]

Originally Posted by JayceeRivers

I have not a single tattoo on my body. However I profess this post makes me desire one. Blatant judgment of other peoples choices of expression is wrong no matter what occupation or reason. Provided the expresser is harming no one in their quest for individuality they have the right to tattoo and pierce and yes even brand their own flesh to their hearts content. If they should, later in life, regret their choice it is THEIR lesson and THEIR own personal epiphany not anyone else's to give or take. To you these are simple marring of the flesh that will degrade value and later become a regret. To the tattooed man or woman it is an expression, later in life it is a memory. How an artist chooses their canvas is personal. Judging someone aggressively and condescendingly will not achieve your goal. If you preferred women who are untattooed in the business book dates with them (I am absolutely not offering my services at all. In fact I would at all costs avoid you like the plague.)

Without variety of choice there is no variety at all. Should the next gentleman state that long hair is more attractive so no woman in the business should cut it? How will she, after all, feel when she is mistaken for a boy? How will her CHILDREN feel when people assume she is a lesbian? (disclaimer my hair is short this is simply an exaggerated example and slight sarcasm)

It is impossible for "all" to adhere to every demand and preference. Even if it was possible they should not have to adhere.

You, my confused friend, have likely caused more women to run out and tattoo themselves than you have saved from the ink you so evidently dislike.

Very well said. And I agree, if anyone was actually on the fence, the OP's judgmental and narrow-minded statements probably sent them straight to the nearest tattoo studio.

[JRLawrence]

Originally Posted by aWickedDon

So you think that because they choose to "rent" their bodies to you for an hour you can be their life coach?

....That's funny.

...........

What is funny is just not seeing anyone with the tattoos on their bodies. Walk away, that is what most of society does. That is why it is difficult to get a job with tattoos showing.

An automatic rejection. Just look further. Don't give them any money at all. We don't have to support this activity.

JR

[Alyssa Marie]

Originally Posted by JRLawrence

What is funny is just not seeing anyone with the tattoos on their bodies. Walk away, that is what most of society does. That is why it is difficult to get a job with tattoos showing.

An automatic rejection. Just look further. Don't give them any money at all. We don't have to support this activity.

JR

Ha hahahahaha!!!!!!! Hahahaha says the guy who both of his reviews are of ladies who have tattoos... Hahahaha oh man what a great reply!
You have no control over what we spend our money on. You don't even have any control over what you spend your own money on!!
Hahahahaha!!! This comment was the best way to finish off my weekend. Thank you!!!!!

[Old-T]

Originally Posted by JRLawrence

What is funny is just not seeing anyone with the tattoos on their bodies. Walk away, that is what most of society does. That is why it is difficult to get a job with tattoos showing.

An automatic rejection. Just look further. Don't give them any money at all. We don't have to support this activity.

JR

Not quite sure what universe you are living in....

[aWickedDon]

Originally Posted by DangedDragon

It's sad that so many people have taken to the habit of carving out the purity of paper with ink....

The poor ceiling of the Sistine Chapel's purity was destroyed by that evil artist Michelangelo.

It may be equally sad that we desecrate the purity of the computer screen with poorly thought out ideas, too.

Very well said...

[aWickedDon]

Originally Posted by JRLawrence

What is funny is just not seeing anyone with the tattoos on their bodies. Walk away, that is what most of society does. That is why it is difficult to get a job with tattoos showing.

An automatic rejection. Just look further. Don't give them any money at all. We don't have to support this activity.

JR

I'm not understanding your point. Are you saying that YOU just don't like tattoos? Or that people with tattoos should be shunned from society AS IF they'd just paid for pussy after practicing their sermon AND their wife was at home cooking dinner? Does having an open mind and acceptance only apply when it suits your taste? ....Please clarify

[JennsLolli]

I'm un-inked, and happily so. Also, I've only come across one tattoo that I felt inclined to lick...and when I did I got a tongue-burn from the stubble (man-forearm). Sooo, I doubt I'll try to lick another in my future. Funny though, whenever I'm about to hook-up with someone my age, I always get the "so show me your ink" line. I know most of my friends have them, and I have a bohemian vibe of sorts so it's possible that I could, but no. No no no no no.

That being said...it's simply my personal preference. I have seen many great pieces on many a sexy person and it can add a lot to his/her vibe. I've never been distracted by ink on a client, but slightly prefer none in my dating life.

[Sickpuppy]

If only Mom and Dad had listened....

[Guido2010]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

If only Mom and Dad had listened....

Nice... Love a couple that have the same interests. When people are together on a subject you can't stop them. Great picture.