It’s called “Shut the F**K up” and leave dumb shit.

[JD Barleycorn]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You got that from the conservative treehouse and I've never seen a bigger bunch of bullshit.

No, it's true but you'll never admit it. The democratic party and liberal groups are a bunch of separate coalitions that are required to band together to have impact. Take McKinney, TX. The protesters are composed of black activists (to be expected), professional protestors (somewhat surprising), the Muslim groups (that is surprising), union groups (???), and even members of an environmental group. Otherwise, a liberal protest would look like a gathering of the Westboro Baptist Church (meaning less than 20 people). They are required to support each other even about things that they either don't care about or are actually opposed to in order to look like a grass roots movement.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by andymarksman

Please watch this video again carefully! This cop was staring at these two "potential assailants" while they were already backing away. Still looking intently at them, he hesitated a few seconds, then pulled out his service weapon when they were already a good eight or nine feet away from him. He could have shot them right there had he not been restrained by his two fellow officers. If he indeed fired his weapon....

Nine feet is 1-2-3 steps from up-close and very personal.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

That famous bus that Obama with him into office.

Where is LLIdiot, the Idiotville ISD Grammar Cop, when we need him?

[i'va biggen]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

In Texas if it ain't mud wrestling ...

...it is generally ignored as another Saturday night on the dance floor.

No matter their "race"!!!!

So quit Race Batting ...

What is race baiting about inquiring about a video shot at the pool party you little weasel? If I wanted to race bait then the sign right outside Greenville would have been brought up. Mud wrestling at the Iron Bear sounds like your idea of fun lexie lacking.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You also have to entertain the idea of what if the 18 kid in the blue shirt had pulled a pistol...and fired! Where would that bullet(s) have ended up in that crowd? Just one more thing that the officer had to consider.

What If?

It is the whole of his action that got him rebuked by his own Chief of Police.


This is not some liberal conspiracy. The guy acted like an idiot...much like I guess you would have acted were you in his shoes. I hope the fuck the majority would have acted like the other eleven officers acted like and the CoP commended.

[atf searcher]

The cop resigned because his police chief gave him the option resign or your ass is fired.
There's no defending this out of control power hungry moron.
Sooner or later hypocritical cops got to learn they aren't above the law.

[Sickpuppy]

The kids that disobeyed police, mouthed-off and/or ran have obviously been indoctrinated by the press and especially the self-promoting race baiters, telling them all cops are bad and they don’t have to obey a cop’s direct order. “Hands up-don’t shoot” bullshit continues although proven false. The nightly news depicts rioters throwing concrete at police and getting away with looting with impunity. “Protestors” (who don’t wait for the facts) almost immediately form a line standing face to face with a line of officers, taunting and daring them to do something about it. A mayor says “let-em loot, its only property”. A prosecutor condones anarchy and disrespecting the cops with comments like “your time has come”. I don’t blame the McKinney kids for being stupid; I blame their parents and the press. Remember the big black single mother that recognized her hooded son participating in the “protests” in Baltimore? She slapped the shit out of him for being there and disrespecting the cops. Why didn’t big mouth’s parent(s) go on TV and apologize for her actions? Why didn’t big-mouth apologize for not following a direct order? Instead, we’re subjected to another self-described “Reverend” telling us it’s going to be “USIS”; “us” being black taking the fight to the cops – reinforcing the kid’s wrong behavior. Yes, some cops should not carry a badge, but as a civilian, a one-on-one confrontation with the cop is not the answer. You comply – you don’t backtalk, throw a rock, point a toy gun at them or run. If you do, don't be surprised if it escalates, DUH.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Sickpuppy

The kids that disobeyed police, mouthed-off and/or ran have obviously been indoctrinated by the press and especially the self-promoting race baiters, telling them all cops are bad and they don’t have to obey a cop’s direct order. “Hands up-don’t shoot” bullshit continues although proven false. The nightly news depicts rioters throwing concrete at police and getting away with looting with impunity. “Protestors” (who don’t wait for the facts) almost immediately form a line standing face to face with a line of officers, taunting and daring them to do something about it. A mayor says “let-em loot, its only property”. A prosecutor condones anarchy and disrespecting the cops with comments like “your time has come”. I don’t blame the McKinney kids for being stupid; I blame their parents and the press. Remember the big black single mother that recognized her hooded son participating in the “protests” in Baltimore? She slapped the shit out of him for being there and disrespecting the cops. Why didn’t big mouth’s parent(s) go on TV and apologize for her actions? Why didn’t big-mouth apologize for not following a direct order? Instead, we’re subjected to another self-described “Reverend” telling us it’s going to be “USIS”; “us” being black taking the fight to the cops – reinforcing the kid’s wrong behavior. Yes, some cops should not carry a badge, but as a civilian, a one-on-one confrontation with the cop is not the answer. You comply – you don’t backtalk, throw a rock, point a toy gun at them or run. If you do, don't be surprised if it escalates, DUH.

Someone's been indoctrinated by the press...

[andymarksman]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Please watch this video again carefully!

"Restrained"?

The two officers went after the two guys, who backed up when the officer turned toward them and began reaching for his weapon (13 seconds in) and then fled as soon as the officer pulled his weapon at about 15 seconds in). The officer never pointed his weapon at the two guys but is clearly shown pointing it toward the ground until he reholstered his weapon after the guys ran and the other two officers left in pursuit.

Have I ever stated the officer "pointed his weapon at the two guys?" The precise moment he drew his weapon, two of his fellow officers rushed up to disrupt his motion, which was odd, considering they didn't feel compelled to "back him up" until he pulled his weapon. One of the two officers even made certain Cpl. Casebolt drew down his weapon before giving pursuit.

So by drawing the gun from his holster, Cpl. Casebolt meant business. He's prepared to use deadly force the moment he pulled out his service weapon. And he did it in such deliberate manner, which was so frightening, considering his absolute power of life and death over ordinary citizens at that precise moment.

[Jackie S]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Someone's been indoctrinated by the press...

But still, the cops abhorant behavior should not make us loose sight of the actions of a bunch of punk ass kids.

But what goes around, comes around. We will probably see the sweet little 15 year old, her fat friend, and those two fine young men that intimidated that cop in custody again. They are punk little shits now, and I doubt age will change them that much.

They have learned a lesson. In today's America, respect for authority, the laws, and other people's property is something they do not have to adhere too.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

But still, the cops abhorant behavior should not make us loose sight of the actions of a bunch of punk ass kids.

But what goes around, comes around. We will probably see the sweet little 15 year old, her fat friend, and those two fine young men that intimidated that cop in custody again. They are punk little shits now, and I doubt age will change them that much.

They have learned a lesson. In today's America, respect for authority, the laws, and other people's property is something they do not have to adhere too.

Through a lawyer, he has apologized and blamed 'emotional stress'.

http://news.yahoo.com/mckinney-polic...190534788.html

[Randall Creed]

Is it a crime to 'mouth off'??

[Randall Creed]

Originally Posted by Jackie S

But still, the cops abhorant behavior should not make us loose sight of the actions of a bunch of punk ass kids.

But what goes around, comes around. We will probably see the sweet little 15 year old, her fat friend, and those two fine young men that intimidated that cop in custody again. They are punk little shits now, and I doubt age will change them that much.

They have learned a lesson. In today's America, respect for authority, the laws, and other people's property is something they do not have to adhere too.

Meanwhile, somebody that looks like you could be in a basement arming up so he can shoot up a school. Of course, 'mouthing off' is way worse of a crime, so let's cuff and stuff all of the mouthers and put Johnny Psycho on trial for his 'insanity', right?

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Rambro Creed

Is it a crime to 'mouth off'??

TEX PE. CODE ANN. § 38.15 : Texas Statutes - Section 38.15: INTERFERENCE WITH PUBLIC DUTIES

(a) A person commits an offense if the person with criminal negligence interrupts, disrupts, impedes, or otherwise interferes with:

(1) a peace officer while the peace officer is performing a duty or exercising authority imposed or granted by law ....

(7) a person who:

(A) has responsibility for assessing, enacting, or enforcing ... safety measures for the state or a county or municipality;

Originally Posted by andymarksman

Have I ever stated the officer "pointed his weapon at the two guys?" The precise moment he drew his weapon, two of his fellow officers rushed up to disrupt his motion, which was odd, considering they didn't feel compelled to "back him up" until he pulled his weapon. One of the two officers even made certain Cpl. Casebolt drew down his weapon before giving pursuit.

So by drawing the gun from his holster, Cpl. Casebolt meant business. He's prepared to use deadly force the moment he pulled out his service weapon. And he did it in such deliberate manner, which was so frightening, considering his absolute power of life and death over ordinary citizens at that precise moment.

All you can safely say is that two officers rushed into the scene. You do not know where they came from or how long they had been jogging to reach and give aid to a fellow officer (they entered the frame from an angle that was in the other officer's blind spot). You cannot say that the officer who was almost surrounded saw or knew how close his buddies were when he decided to draw his weapon. It's possible that the officer in question felt that he was alone and surrounded. It's clear that the two young men were within one step -- not nine feet -- of the officer when he moved his hand to his weapon. It's also possible that he holstered his weapon when he no longer felt threatened and not because either of the other officers said anything to him other than announce their presence. That he did not holster it immediately seems to indicate no one directed him to put it away, and he did so of his own accord when he returned to dealing with the young female.

[WombRaider]

Everybody can go home, IB is here. Dumbass cracker.