Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 646
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 396
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
Starscream66 279
George Spelvin 265
sharkman29 255
Top Posters
DallasRain70793
biomed163231
Yssup Rider60927
gman4453294
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48646
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42577
CryptKicker37215
The_Waco_Kid37006
Mokoa36496
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2023, 01:16 PM   #61
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default Forrest Gump's momma has a better grasp of economics than our resident guru!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
I love how you keep falling back on the Trump tax cuts. How about the Trump deficit spending. Unlike his predecessor, the Trump years even before Covid we deficits annually. So he cut taxes and propped up the economy by not paying for his spending
You have to remember who you are debating. These Reagan loving Voodoo economic guru's only complain about debt and deficits when there is a Democrat in the WH.

I've been asking them about these so called great economic numbers along with their corresponding large deficits for forty years.

All they can counter is the hogwash abou a lower tax rate mean larger tax revenue
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 01:51 PM   #62
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,649
Encounters: 10
Default Is He Waiting for an Invite from the Oxford Union Debating Society?

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
You have to remember who you are debating...
Who's debating? The OP hasn't replied to a single one of my comments.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 02:19 PM   #63
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Who's debating? The OP hasn't replied to a single one of my comments.
He is debating Tiny...did you threaten to rtm him too?

Maybe that is why...
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 02:30 PM   #64
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,649
Encounters: 10
Default Economics Is Like a Box of Chocolates...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
He is debating Tiny...
So whenever you refer derisively to "our resident economic guru" you mean Tiny, right?

Thanks for clarifying!


lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 04:40 PM   #65
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,896
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
Now you’re just starting to tout the Fox News line. I’ve seen no evidence that people are coming back part-time. Wages are up which actually counters that theory. Job creation numbers also don’t support the “people aren’t going back to work” claims on Fox. Maybe we’ll get some job participation numbers by year end that might shed some light on that.

Simply put, 3.4 unemployment is a great sign. Will it be temporary, sure maybe, but not likely in the short term. Recession pressures are being controlled, not just in the US but in Europe. Production is up and supply chains are vastly improved over the past 12 months.

I love how you keep falling back on the Trump tax cuts. How about the Trump deficit spending. Unlike his predecessor, the Trump years even before Covid we deficits annually. So he cut taxes and propped up the economy by not paying for his spending. If you wanna understand the Trump economy that’s it for you right there. At least Obama was able to pay for the money he spent and had low and negative deficits.

Lusty remains on ignore. I can’t really abide people arguing through lying or changing my words to try to make their point.

Bidenomics has worked. The proof is in the puddin.
Hi Blackman,

I never even thought that your astute (honestly) analysis of legal issues on this board was something you pulled from MSNBC. Now I may not read the Journal of Financial Economics before breakfast, like LustyLad and Texas Contrarian, but I do use economics almost every day in my work. And I don't listen to Fox News for economic info. What I said about employment and inflation actually came from listening to David Rubenstein's interview with Fed Chairman Powell yesterday. And regurgitating something an economist said on CNBC the other day.

I read your post this morning and was going to provide a lengthy reply. But Lusty Lad has already addressed your points. I shall repost them here. And I'll give him a taste of his own medicine! I'll change a few words of his, to make a couple of posts more diplomatic. Seriously, I've found anything he and Texas Contrarian had to say about economics worth reading.

The one thing I'd add is that the labor force participation rate went from 62.7% when the TCJA corporate tax cut became effective in January, 2018, to 63.3% in the months before COVID. It's currently back down around 62.4%. I suspect it would be lower without the improvement in business conditions that resulted from lower corporate tax rates, and other provisions of the TCJA that encouraged companies to invest and add jobs here in the USA instead of foreign countries.

Please note LustyLad's comments about the increase in government revenues after the tax cuts. Also the chart showing annual deficits from 2009 to 2017. Both are particularly enlightening.

Changes from the original text, to make it more diplomatic, are in red.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Hmmm... so you're saying Trump kept a good economy chugging along with low inflation, until Biden came in and had sex with what Trump put in place?





Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
But heck, you don't have to take Tiny's word for it, 1b1. Or Texas Contrarian's word. Or mine.

Here's a quick study published last year by the economists at the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank:

https://www.frbsf.org/economic-resea...her-countries/


"...since the first half of 2021, U.S. inflation has increasingly outpaced inflation in other developed countries. Estimates suggest that fiscal support measures designed to counteract the severity of the pandemic’s economic effect may have contributed to this divergence by raising inflation about 3 percentage points by the end of 2021."





Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
We actually DID experience a recession last year. GDP growth was negative in the first half of 2022. Economists widely agree on the definition of a recession - it's 2 consecutive quarterly declines in real GDP. Instead of acknowledging this fact last year while characterizing the downturn as brief, shallow and mild, the Biden team tried to deny it happened altogether.





By the way 1b1 - I don't follow your argument that low unemployment makes another recession unlikely. That's like saying the tail wags the dog.

The jobless rate doesn't propel the economy. It's the other way around. The level of economic activity drives the jobless rate up or down. That's why unemployment is called a "lagging" indicator.

On what specific economic metrics are we outperforming the rest of the world?

Not economic growth.

Here are the latest IMF comparisons. US growth was 2.0% in 2022 (despite being negative in the first half) versus 3.4% for the world economy.

For this year, the IMF is projecting US growth of 1.4%, less than half the rate it is forecasting for the global economy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
That's correct. The (pre-COVID) labor force participation rate at the start of 2020 was 63.3% versus 62.4% last month. The difference may not sound like a lot, but it translates into almost 2.5 million American workers who have dropped out of the labor force and not returned.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CIVPART


Biden boasted in his SOTU speech that the economy has created 12 million "new" jobs since he took office.

It's true that total employment has increased from 142 million in Jan. 2021 to 154 million last month. Compared with the pre-COVID peak of 152.4 million in Feb. 2020, however, the increase (less than 3 million jobs) looks considerably less impressive.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PAYEMS#0
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
You can verify this by looking it up,

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of part-time employees has climbed from 24.6 million in Jan. 2021 to 27.4 million last month. That's an increase of 2.8 million since Biden took office.

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LNS12600000

And kindly note that Tiny did not parrot FOX News. His post specifically cites Larry Summers, a well-known Democrat economist, during an appearance on CNN, a liberal cable news channel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Also kindly note that economists don't use the term "negative deficit."
Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Do you mean a SURPLUS? If so, you are mistaken.

Trump's predecessor - that's Barack Obama - ran huge budget deficits during all 8 years of his Presidency. The deficits topped $1 billion during each year of his first term (2009-2012). As a percent of GDP, they averaged a record 8.4%. For you to claim Obama was able to "pay for what he spent" (using federal revenues) is incorrect!





As for the Trump tax cuts, have you looked up how much federal revenues have exploded since their enactment? It's truly mind-boggling!

In FY 2017, the federal govt raked in $3.32 trillion.

In FY 2022, the feds sucked in $4.90 trillion... that's an increase of 48%!!!


It's obvious from this explosion that the Trump tax cuts (so demonized by dim-retards) didn't exactly starve the federal govt of revenues!

Question - How many people on this board can say their income soared by 48% in the past 5 years? And if your income did jump that dramatically, were you able to live comfortably within your means? Or did you urinate away all the extra income and go deeper & deeper into debt like the feds habitually do?

Look up the enlightening numbers. It's obvious we have a SPENDING problem, not a REVENUE problem!
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 04:46 PM   #66
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,896
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
So whenever you refer derisively to "our resident economic guru" you mean Tiny, right?

Thanks for clarifying!
Hahaha! I can hold my own in project economics, and that's about it. You and TC are the gurus.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 04:53 PM   #67
Tiny
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Mar 4, 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,896
Encounters: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
On what specific economic metrics are we outperforming the rest of the world?

Not economic growth.

Here are the latest IMF comparisons. US growth was 2.0% in 2022 (despite being negative in the first half) versus 3.4% for the world economy.

For this year, the IMF is projecting US growth of 1.4%, less than half the rate it is forecasting for the global economy.


That sucks. We're not projected to even outperform perennially low-growth Europe. And we're not suffering nearly as badly as they are from the fallout of the Russia/Ukraine situation.
Tiny is online now   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:02 PM   #68
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default You just spew partisan bs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
So whenever you refer derisively to "our resident economic guru" you mean Tiny, right?

Thanks for clarifying!
Derisively??? It is not encouraged by eccie Mods to speak Derisively but were it to be....I'd be referring to you 100% of the time when using that term.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:04 PM   #69
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
That sucks. We're not projected to even outperform perennially low-growth Europe. And we're not suffering nearly as badly as they are from the fallout of the Russia/Ukraine situation.
Have you looked at our intrest rates lately?

Man you two can sure highlight the old saying about numbers and statistics and lying
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:13 PM   #70
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default Voodoo economics is still alive and kicking!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiny View Post
As for the Trump tax cuts, have you looked up how much federal revenues have exploded since their enactment? It's truly mind-boggling!

In FY 2017, the federal govt raked in $3.32 trillion.

In FY 2022, the feds sucked in $4.90 trillion... that's an increase of 48%!!!


.
So Trump gets credit for increasing tax revenues but no blame for record deficits?

This is 1980-88 all over again!

What was inflation back in your Hero's day? Hint I think a high of 14%

What were we doing to the Russians? Hint Kicking their ass by proxy.

We're we running huge debts? Hint...yes



AND YOU SAY IT WAS THE BEST TIME EVER. This should be like you 40 year reunion! Biden is the new Reagan!
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:16 PM   #71
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,649
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Have you looked at our intrest (sic) rates lately?
So what's your point?

Are you agreeing or disagreeing with 1b1 when he claims:

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1blackman1 View Post
We are outperforming the rest of the world by every metric... and are more likely to improve faster than everywhere else.
Apparently the IMF disagrees.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:27 PM   #72
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,649
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
As for the Trump tax cuts, have you looked up how much federal revenues have exploded since their enactment? It's truly mind-boggling!

In FY 2017, the federal govt raked in $3.32 trillion.

In FY 2022, the feds sucked in $4.90 trillion... that's an increase of 48%!!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
This is 1980-88 all over again!
You need to stay on topic.

If the 2017 tax cuts (which are still on the books) were so damaging to the federal government's revenue collection, how do you explain the simple, indisputable fact that federal revenues exploded by 48% following the enactment of those tax changes?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:38 PM   #73
The_Waco_Kid
AKA Admiral Waco Kid
 
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: The MAGA Zone
Posts: 37,006
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
So Trump gets credit for increasing tax revenues but no blame for record deficits?

This is 1980-88 all over again!

What was inflation back in your Hero's day? Hint I think a high of 14%

What were we doing to the Russians? Hint Kicking their ass by proxy.

We're we running huge debts? Hint...yes



AND YOU SAY IT WAS THE BEST TIME EVER. This should be like you 40 year reunion! Biden is the new Reagan!

"WTF, Biden is no Ronald Reagan" - TWK


interesting how you only focus on deficits under Republican presidents and seem unable or unwilling to address those deficits under Democratic presidents.


you've been proven wrong time and again with your claim Reagan "started the debt" which when back 20 years plus before Reagan took office. it's why on purpose you left out the entire year by year of Debt to GDP prior to Reagan which i proved that Reagan's 8 year average was 39% while the 20 years prior averaged 36%.


Biden has not created 12 million jobs as he claimed last night. the vast majority of those jobs are people returning to work after their Democrat COVID helicopter money dumps ran out and they had to go back to work.


the interest rates are going up as a direct result of the Democrats dumping money into the economy. any real economist not named Paul Krugman or Richard Wolff will tell you that.
The_Waco_Kid is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:54 PM   #74
lustylad
Premium Access
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 18,649
Encounters: 10
Default Actually I Like to Spew (Non-Partisan) Economic Data

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
You just spew partisan bs.
So... are you calling the San Francisco Federal Reserve study I cited "partisan bullshit"?

Are you saying the graphs I linked you to on the St. Louis Federal Reserve website smell like "partisan bullshit"?

Do you think the IMF's January 2023 World Economic Outlook is full of "partisan bullshit"?

Do you believe the fiscal data (including federal tax revenues) reported by the US Treasury Department is "partisan bullshit"?

Kindly explain!!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 05:58 PM   #75
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid View Post


you've been proven wrong time and again with your claim Reagan "started the debt" which when back 20 years plus before Reagan took office. it's why on purpose you left out the entire year by year of Debt to GDP prior to Reagan which i proved that Reagan's 8 year average was 39% while the 20 years prior averaged 36%.

This is off topic so I can't really respond but will say you proved nothing of the sort.

We do have a replay of inflation although not as high as Reagan nor is unemployment as high as it was under Ronnie....but the playbook seems the same....so all you Ronnie lovers should be praising Biden. He is doing the Ronnie shuffle
WTF is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved