Pimp Threads

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by RodnReel

Staff Edit - The following are not permitted on Eccie:

• Insulting Others
• Targeting other members for attacks
• Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
• Disrespecting other members on the site
• General rudeness toward other members on the site

Biomed1

QFM

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by RodnReel

Staff Edit - The following are not permitted on Eccie:

• Insulting Others
• Targeting other members for attacks
• Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
• Disrespecting other members on the site
• General rudeness toward other members on the site

Biomed1

To the moderator: Now that you’ve started imputing intent into my posts and sanctioning them as targeting and personal attacks even when they don’t mention anyone specific, will you be applying the same standard to these insults directed at another member by RodnReel? They are obviously targeted at Ginger Doll, as evidenced, among other things, by the reference to 550+ reviews. Only one eccie provider has more, and she is not anywhere in this thread.

Or if you won't enforce the specific targeting against Ginger, will you at least be applying the eccie rule about targeting “groups of users,” as you have to my posts about pimps? Clearly RodnReel is casting aspersions against providers above a certain age range here. That is a group or class of eccie users, is it not?

I've been receiving 5 points for each and every rudeness violation lately. Apparently RodnReel is not receiving the same treatment, since he has more than enough in this thread alone to have accumulated enough points for a ban if he was, and he has even defied moderator instructions by reposting the same thing that got staff edited yesterday.

To RodnReel: Is it so hard to understand that you make words plural by putting an ‘S’ on the end of them?

hobbyist: singular
hobbyists: plural

[JdeHog]

Originally Posted by RodnReel

Staff Edit - The following are not permitted on Eccie:

• Insulting Others
• Targeting other members for attacks
• Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
• Disrespecting other members on the site
• General rudeness toward other members on the site

Biomed1

I feel dumber for having read this.

[Rockydoc]

It makes him look small. He obviously is having difficulty competing against Ginger. Therefore, he resorts to thinly veiled lame personal attacks. Kind of sad, really.

[JdeHog]

Originally Posted by Rockydoc

It makes him look small. He obviously is having difficulty competing against Ginger. Therefore, he resorts to thinly veiled lame personal attacks. Kind of sad, really.

Well put. I guess quantity really doesn't beat quality.

[JdeHog]

Originally Posted by JdeHog

Well put. I guess quantity really doesn't beat quality.

To clarify: An entire harem of ladies delivering mediocre service doesn't match the quality of service consistently provided by one esteemed lady.

[biomed1]

3 points to mention:

1. QFM is not needed
   • The RTM Function sends a copy of the Post being reported to the staff section of the board.
2. I have stated this before, Staff does not discuss the Violations of the membership with other members.
   • The Guidelines are enforced equally for all violations.
   • Just as Staff does not discuss your Infraction history with other members, we provide this same courtesy to the other members as well.
   • If you wish to share your Infraction History on the board, that's your choice.
3. SpankyJ, as a stickler for Guidelines you seem to keep overlooking Guideline # 4, particularly the underlined portion.

#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by biomed1

3 points to mention:

1. QFM is not needed
   • The RTM Function sends a copy of the Post being reported to the staff section of the board.
2. I have stated this before, Staff does not discuss the Violations of the membership with other members.
   • The Guidelines are enforced equally for all violations.
3. SpankyJ, as a stickler for Guidelines you seem to keep overlooking Guideline # 4, particularly the underlined portion.

I haven't made a single post in this thread that got staff edited or received a warning or points. Contrast that to RodnReel, who has multiple examples including one where he defied you and reposted what was staff edited and then taunted you about it.

[Ginger Doll]

Originally Posted by biomed1

3 points to mention:

1. QFM is not needed
   • The RTM Function sends a copy of the Post being reported to the staff section of the board.
2. I have stated this before, Staff does not discuss the Violations of the membership with other members.
   • The Guidelines are enforced equally for all violations.
3. SpankyJ, as a stickler for Guidelines you seem to keep overlooking Guideline # 4, particularly the underlined portion.

Does the RTM function send the original post to moderators? Or an edited version — if the poster goes back to alter their offensive statements?

I’ve always believed it was the latter, and that’s why I QFM. Sorry if you find that redundant, but I feel it’s necessary to appropriately report the violations.

[biomed1]

You and he have had your posts edited in accordance with the Guidelines in MANY threads.

While your posts have not been edited in this thread, it doesn't mean that you hadn't stepped up to the line and came very close to crossing it.

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by Ginger Doll

Does the RTM function send the original post to moderators?

Or an edited version — if the poster goes back to alter their offensive statements?

It sends the post that you're reading/reporting.

If YOU find a post that is in violation of the Guidelines, RTM the post at that time.

It sends the Post you are looking at to the Staff Area.

No need to Quote it in another post in the thread.

Just click this button and fill out the form and click send/submit.

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by biomed1

You and he have had your posts edited in accordance with the Guidelines in MANY threads.

While your posts have not been edited in this thread, it doesn't mean that you hadn't stepped up to the line and came very close to crossing it.

I wasn't aware that getting close to making a violation and actually making a violation were the same thing. Good to know.

[Guest110920]

Well, I've been ordered by our glorious moderator to have no further contact with RodnReel under threat of a "cyberstalking" ban, despite the fact that I've done nothing in this thread to warrant any moderator action. So it appears he will be able to continue to taunt me and others but I will be unable to respond to him further.

[biomed1]

Originally Posted by SpankyJ

I wasn't aware that getting close to making a violation and actually making a violation were the same thing. Good to know.

They're not.

As noted in the first sentence - you have had MANY posts edited in other threads.

There were several posts by you in this thread that on first glance would have required the assessing of points.

[Guest110920]

Originally Posted by biomed1

They're not.

As noted in the first sentence - you have had MANY posts edited in other threads.

There were several posts by you in this thread that on first glance would have required the assessing of points.

But apparently on second glance, they didn't. So how are they relevant?