Girls Advertising BBFS

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by milfy2002

Yeah honey, just like all the ladies offering deep throat and Greek are messing it up for the rest of us who don't/won't/can't.

If I started a threAD every time somebody begged me for Greek or tried to force DT on me then y'all'd be more tired of me than you already are.

By this point in the game you should already know that there is a certain type of man that is always going to try to get what he cannot have, it's some kind of psychological victory.

I don't know if the OP directed her message towards you, but I was totally taken aback looking at your showcase. I agree with the OP that advertising BBFS is a risk to the community.

Yes there's other activities that are a risk as well, but a good analogy is anyone who drives a car on an icy bridge is at risk for a possible car accident. However, driving 80 mph on an icy bridge with worn out tires and bad brakes is a far greater risk.

You Milfy for the criteria for a second scenario. There's no way I would schedule with you if you were offering free sessions.

It would be hard for me to believe that you never caught an STD- I am just startled.

Now before your WK's try to flame me and call me a troll. I have been hobbying since the ASPD dates and I am no troll or newbie.I have not been very active in the lifestyle of late for my own personal reasons.

I do remember the OP from the ASPD days, never visited her, but she is spot on of her assessment to ladies who advertise BBFS. Hopefully, you are intelligent to know that providing GFE service vs BBFS is night and day difference in terms of risk.

Finally, this is just my honest opinion. I think Milfy advertises BBFS mainly so she can get business. It's no secret if you compare the OP to Milfy who is the sexier of the two- not even debatable, but WALDT- carry on.

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by GiovaniDosSantos

...less homicides against whites vs whites than blacks vs blacks

You are getting way off topic here

[TheOracle]

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

I don't know if the OP directed her message towards you, but I was totally taken aback looking at your showcase. I agree with the OP that advertising BBFS is a risk to the community.

Yes there's other activities that are a risk as well, but a good analogy is anyone who drives a car on an icy bridge is at risk for a possible car accident. However, driving 80 mph on an icy bridge with worn out tires and bad brakes is a far greater risk.

I feel like this logic is totally backwards, and why the OP makes no sense. Wouldn't it be safer to know who openly engages in bbfs so you can know who to avoid if you feel it poses a greater risk? As opposed to what the OP is suggesting, which is to do it BCD and just keep it hush hush so people don't know about it while potentially posing just as much of a risk. Your own response to milfy2002 even supports that. If she wasn't open about it you may not know, but b/c she is you were able to come to the decision that "there is no way I would schedule with you if you were offering free sessions."

From the provider standpoint, wouldn't you have a better chance of knowing who to avoid by knowing those other providers who openly advertise bbfs and which clients may have seen them? For example, if a client contacts you for a session and you see he has reviewed or commented that he's seen a bbfs provider then you can choose to pass on that client b/c of the perceived greater risk. I know everyone doesn't comment or review who they've seen so it's not foolproof, but at least it's better than everybody keeping it a secret or lying about it so you have little to no chance of knowing at all.


As far as not wanting to compete, well that's just silly and doesn't warrant much of response. There's always someone who comes along willing to shift the paradigm and offer what everyone else won't so they can get business. All you can do is find a way to compete, or find a new line of work.

[Copierguy0]

Originally Posted by GiovaniDosSantos

lol you used to have videos on them streaming porn site bare backing some white guy lol wtf you talking about.

Originally Posted by !!Sexy Erotic Morgan

Listen you guys I know BB happens and I would be a fucking liar if I said I never did it.

Y’all act like this is high school and there is a non-spoken mythical code that only a few of us know about. Masking, hiding this, or keeping it on the down low is no longer needed, we all know about it.

BBFS, SS, Michael Corleone – the Don, CATHOLIC, BBQ, CIP, CIA, no cover, BB, CREAMPIE, and fill her with baby batter.

Ladies no longer need to put in their advertising: no list = BBFS asking for it will get you put on the DNS list. (Then, do it on reviews) Masking, hiding this, or keeping it on the down low is not needed and only makes you look like you really want it at a different rate just to get more business. STOP acting like Mother Theresa or the Virgin Mary - oh wait those are CATHOLICS. WE ALL KNOW ABOUT IT. #upsell

Guy’s no longer need to put in reviews SS then, they suited up or cover up, when we know most of your reviews are BBFS and you are a well-known king bare backer, AND the ladies you see are well-known Queen bare backer. It has got to the point that all i have to do is see a name (his or her's) and i know that BBFS was involved. (with possible vid's or pics to prove it)

If you LINK all the providers that have been doing this in secrecy or not, with all the clients that have been doing this in secrecy or not, it has spread to everyone on ECCIE already. and so on, and so on, and so on.

CG

[NeverMarry]

Originally Posted by TheOracle

From the provider standpoint, wouldn't you have a better chance of knowing who to avoid by knowing those other providers who openly advertise bbfs and which clients may have seen them? For example, if a client contacts you for a session and you see he has reviewed or commented that he's seen a bbfs provider then you can choose to pass on that client b/c of the perceived greater risk. I know everyone doesn't comment or review who they've seen so it's not foolproof, but at least it's better than everybody keeping it a secret or lying about it so you have little to no chance of knowing at all.

I agree. I also think more transparency would reduce the number of unwanted bbfs requests.

[Grace Preston]

Originally Posted by PeterBota

Why ? Have u paid to fuck the bbfs sluts ?

No, but they post ads and showcases... with pics... that clearly show that they aren't AA. Doesn't take a biomedical engineer to figure that one out, sporty.

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by TheOracle

I feel like this logic is totally backwards, and why the OP makes no sense. Wouldn't it be safer to know who openly engages in bbfs so you can know who to avoid if you feel it poses a greater risk? As opposed to what the OP is suggesting, which is to do it BCD and just keep it hush hush so people don't know about it while potentially posing just as much of a risk. Your own response to milfy2002 even supports that. If she wasn't open about it you may not know, but b/c she is you were able to come to the decision that "there is no way I would schedule with you if you were offering free sessions."

From the provider standpoint, wouldn't you have a better chance of knowing who to avoid by knowing those other providers who openly advertise bbfs and which clients may have seen them? For example, if a client contacts you for a session and you see he has reviewed or commented that he's seen a bbfs provider then you can choose to pass on that client b/c of the perceived greater risk. I know everyone doesn't comment or review who they've seen so it's not foolproof, but at least it's better than everybody keeping it a secret or lying about it so you have little to no chance of knowing at all.


As far as not wanting to compete, well that's just silly and doesn't warrant much of response. There's always someone who comes along willing to shift the paradigm and offer what everyone else won't so they can get business. All you can do is find a way to compete, or find a new line of work.

I respectively disagree, the first rule of thumb in this industry is SAFETY and that's whether you are a hobbyist or an escort.
You seem to downplay the fact that Milfy2002 and others who openly engage in a free for all BBFS for any one who schedules with her is a huge risk.

It's one thing to offer BBFS to select "favorite" or "special" clients, but to have an open door policy of any random guy that schedules with her is a whole new level of risk.

Oracle if your good friend told you that every Friday and Saturday he goes out to a club, meets a lady, takes her home and has unprotected sex with her each time- what would be your response?
Wouldn't you like any rationale human being say dude you are playing Russian roulette with your cock?

I have read Morgan's post many times and she's basically using common sense.

If it becomes a trend in Dallas, that 8 out of 10 providers offer BBFS, expect the STD rates to greatly increase in your metroplex. If you look at the statistics in DFW, STD's have been on a gradual rise and I am not saying that hobbying is attributing to the spike, but the more BBFS that takes place will send linear line north.

[PeterBota]

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

I don't know if the OP directed her message towards you, but I was totally taken aback looking at your showcase. I agree with the OP that advertising BBFS is a risk to the community.

Yes there's other activities that are a risk as well, but a good analogy is anyone who drives a car on an icy bridge is at risk for a possible car accident. However, driving 80 mph on an icy bridge with worn out tires and bad brakes is a far greater risk.

You Milfy for the criteria for a second scenario. There's no way I would schedule with you if you were offering free sessions.

It would be hard for me to believe that you never caught an STD- I am just startled.

Now before your WK's try to flame me and call me a troll. I have been hobbying since the ASPD dates and I am no troll or newbie.I have not been very active in the lifestyle of late for my own personal reasons.

I do remember the OP from the ASPD days, never visited her, but she is spot on of her assessment to ladies who advertise BBFS. Hopefully, you are intelligent to know that providing GFE service vs BBFS is night and day difference in terms of risk.

Finally, this is just my honest opinion. I think Milfy advertises BBFS mainly so she can get business. It's no secret if you compare the OP to Milfy who is the sexier of the two- not even debatable, but WALDT- carry on.

Sparky. Speculation of a member having a std is a direct violation of eccie guidelines. Plz take ur ass back to 6th st.

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by GiovaniDosSantos

lol you used to have videos on them streaming porn site bare backing some white guy lol wtf you talking about.

I saw the video(s) in question, if you can't decipher that the guy in the video is a boyfriend or some other "exclusive" guy besides a random joe or a client than you aren't too bright.

Also, some mainstream porn stars(and I have been fortunate enough to have had sessions with 3 in my hobby life) also escort, but don't offer BBFS as part of their activities. Are the porn stars, hypocrites if they don't offer BBFS to hobbyist despite the fact that they have numerous of videos where they partake in BBFS?

Read her post again she said ladies who ADVERTISE BBFS!!!!

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by PeterBota

Sparky. Speculation of a member having a std is a direct violation of eccie guidelines. Plz take ur ass back to 6th st.

Take your ass back to English class and learn the difference between past tense and present tense. You know the words "had" and "have" are totally different. This isn't my first rodeo, I know the guidelines and there was no speculation-you are really reaching.

[GiovaniDosSantos]

You know nothing, you are misfiring spark plug time to get replaced......

[Sparkplug18]

Originally Posted by GiovaniDosSantos

You know nothing, you are misfiring spark plug time to get replaced......

How long did it take you to come up with that line? And stop liking your own post.

[GiovaniDosSantos]

Faster than it took you to make another handle Log in your real handle...come on don't be a coward hiding behind a fake one.

[TinMan]

So, does anyone really think if they stopped advertising it, they’d stop doing it?

[novacain]

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

I don't know if the OP directed her message towards you, but I was totally taken aback looking at your showcase. I agree with the OP that advertising BBFS is a risk to the community.

Yes there's other activities that are a risk as well, but a good analogy is anyone who drives a car on an icy bridge is at risk for a possible car accident. However, driving 80 mph on an icy bridge with worn out tires and bad brakes is a far greater risk.

You Milfy for the criteria for a second scenario. There's no way I would schedule with you if you were offering free sessions.

It would be hard for me to believe that you never caught an STD- I am just startled.

Now before your WK's try to flame me and call me a troll. I have been hobbying since the ASPD dates and I am no troll or newbie.I have not been very active in the lifestyle of late for my own personal reasons.

I do remember the OP from the ASPD days, never visited her, but she is spot on of her assessment to ladies who advertise BBFS. Hopefully, you are intelligent to know that providing GFE service vs BBFS is night and day difference in terms of risk.

Finally, this is just my honest opinion. I think Milfy advertises BBFS mainly so she can get business. It's no secret if you compare the OP to Milfy who is the sexier of the two- not even debatable, but WALDT- carry on.

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

I respectively disagree, the first rule of thumb in this industry is SAFETY and that's whether you are a hobbyist or an escort.
You seem to downplay the fact that Milfy2002 and others who openly engage in a free for all BBFS for any one who schedules with her is a huge risk.

It's one thing to offer BBFS to select "favorite" or "special" clients, but to have an open door policy of any random guy that schedules with her is a whole new level of risk.

Oracle if your good friend told you that every Friday and Saturday he goes out to a club, meets a lady, takes her home and has unprotected sex with her each time- what would be your response?
Wouldn't you like any rationale human being say dude you are playing Russian roulette with your cock?

I have read Morgan's post many times and she's basically using common sense.

If it becomes a trend in Dallas, that 8 out of 10 providers offer BBFS, expect the STD rates to greatly increase in your metroplex. If you look at the statistics in DFW, STD's have been on a gradual rise and I am not saying that hobbying is attributing to the spike, but the more BBFS that takes place will send linear line north.

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

I saw the video(s) in question, if you can't decipher that the guy in the video is a boyfriend or some other "exclusive" guy besides a random joe or a client than you aren't too bright.

Also, some mainstream porn stars(and I have been fortunate enough to have had sessions with 3 in my hobby life) also escort, but don't offer BBFS as part of their activities. Are the porn stars, hypocrites if they don't offer BBFS to hobbyist despite the fact that they have numerous of videos where they partake in BBFS?

Read her post again she said ladies who ADVERTISE BBFS!!!!

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

Take your ass back to English class and learn the difference between past tense and present tense. You know the words "had" and "have" are totally different. This isn't my first rodeo, I know the guidelines and there was no speculation-you are really reaching.

Originally Posted by Sparkplug18

How long did it take you to come up with that line? And stop liking your own post.

Nice Mandel............ how about you post with your REAL handle........... you know, the one you post ads with!