Bill Weld calls for death penalty for Trump's ‘treason’

[matchingmole]

Things are getting so bad for Trump, he may actually do one of his ‘making believe Melania and I are going to church’ photo-ops one of these Sundays

[dilbert firestorm]

McConnell has said the he may not hold a trial. I think he might have a committee look into if the trials is worth wasting everyones time.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

McConnell has said the he may not hold a trial. I think he might have a committee look into if the trials is worth wasting everyones time.

Based on some of the Dems latest comments like Gov Cuomo, I'm not sure it's going beyond the inquiry that Pelosi dove preemptively into. They are beginning to see that the phone transcript doesn't show anything out of line and that the whistleblower information is potentially misrepresented and in many instances even incorrect.

Sure it'll be a big show again and lots of waving hands from the left during it like the Mueller report, but it's headed the same direction.

This is much of what McConnel is alluding to in not even going to trial. The evidence of wrong doing just doesn't hold up, but I will caveat that with a yet.

I've said all along throw Trump out if you can show an actual crime. To-date, it hasn't been there, and I really don't think this is it either.

[Unique_Carpenter]

Weld = McCarthy

[themystic]

Originally Posted by eccielover

Based on some of the Dems latest comments like Gov Cuomo, I'm not sure it's going beyond the inquiry that Pelosi dove preemptively into. They are beginning to see that the phone transcript doesn't show anything out of line and that the whistleblower information is potentially misrepresented and in many instances even incorrect.

Sure it'll be a big show again and lots of waving hands from the left during it like the Mueller report, but it's headed the same direction.

This is much of what McConnel is alluding to in not even going to trial. The evidence of wrong doing just doesn't hold up, but I will caveat that with a yet.

I've said all along throw Trump out if you can show an actual crime. To-date, it hasn't been there, and I really don't think this is it either.

Sad state of affairs. Lets play , is this a crime or not? you've been conned el

[themystic]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

McConnell has said the he may not hold a trial. I think he might have a committee look into if the trials is worth wasting everyones time.

Moscow Mitch has unwillingly joined the Scardy Cat club. He cant go out in DC without a miniature army of SS men to protect him. He is that disrespected

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by themystic

Sad state of affairs. Lets play , is this a crime or not? you've been conned el

Not me. The phone transcript is not indicative of any crime.

It's you like you're hero Nancy who jumped in with both feet on a crime that's not a crime.

I remember the day the Mueller report came out you convicting Trump almost immediately. How's that worked out for you.

NO COLLUSION, yet it gets thrown out by the left still in nearly every response. The phone transcript does not show anything and has even been refuted as "pressure" by the Ukraine President.

But I understand how your handlers second hand translation of the phone transcript proclaiming Trump guilt is more believable that either of the people actually involved in the call.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by eccielover

Not me. The phone transcript is not indicative of any crime.

It's you like you're hero Nancy who jumped in with both feet on a crime that's not a crime.

I remember the day the Mueller report came out you convicting Trump almost immediately. How's that worked out for you.

NO COLLUSION, yet it gets thrown out by the left still in nearly every response. The phone transcript does not show anything and has even been refuted as "pressure" by the Ukraine President.

But I understand how your handlers second hand translation of the phone transcript proclaiming Trump guilt is more believable that either of the people actually involved in the call.

218 needed. They have that. They didn't have it a week ago. Something changed and it wasn't something someone read in the paper. get back to Hillary's 2016 emails. what a pathetic group of people you support

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by themystic

218 needed. They have that. They didn't have it a week ago. Something changed and it wasn't something someone read in the paper. get back to Hillary's 2016 emails. what a pathetic group of people you support

Do they have it? Then why not vote?

If it's so cut and dried and obvious, it should be easy - right?

I don't think they've even drafted the articles you so easily say they are ready to commit to.

[matchingmole]

Originally Posted by themystic

218 needed. They have that. They didn't have it a week ago. Something changed and it wasn't something someone read in the paper. get back to Hillary's 2016 emails. what a pathetic group of people you support

It was the beautiful phone transcript...Trump was an even bigger moron for releasing it

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by matchingmole

It was the beautiful phone transcript

Yes it was.

[matchingmole]

Originally Posted by eccielover

Yes it was.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by matchingmole

And what does some bullshit something from 2017 have to do with the current discussion.

I think you are starting to lose it.

[matchingmole]

Same as now

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by matchingmole

Same as now

So nothing of relevance...Gotcha.