Why A Yes Vote For The Iran Nuclear Deal Is A No-Brainer

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

That's what you lying liberals say to all of us conservative earners that have our tax dollars confiscated to support your lazy, swishy walking asses . Get busy practicing that trombone woomby ! Then you can call yourself a "musician" along with all the other job titles that you've given yourself !

He's deflecting his traits onto us. If you want a good idea of how others near him in real life see him, read what he says about us.

[herfacechair]

You see, this is what I meant by WombRaider projecting his traits onto us.

Originally Posted by WombRaider

You like having water that is safe to drink? You like eating food that's safe to eat? You like driving on roads? Your tax dollars aren't 'confiscated', you fucking idiot. I bet you're poor as a fucking church mouse and YET, you will continue to elect white millionaires who don't give two fucks about you, because they're on your team. You are the fucking morons they use as mortar to build their palaces. And you're too fucking stupid to know it. They keep you busy by telling you the brown and black man are your enemy and you eat that shit up, because, as I previously said, you're fucking stupid.

You're missing the point. Nowhere, in the post that you replied to, is he arguing that he shouldn't pay any taxes at all. He's arguing against the idea that we pay more and more taxes towards an inefficient mechanism when it comes to impacting the free market economy. He would like to keep more of what he earns so that he could have more money to spend. That's a reasonable expectation, one that unites members of both parties.

The facts indicate that when everybody, especially the rich and super rich (economic engine) keep more of their money, tax revenues collected tend to go up. This is a fact that repeats itself all over the world where people are allowed to keep more of their money, as opposed to people being left with less and less money to spend on their own.

With more tax revenues, and with efficient spending, money could be spent for filtering water, inspecting food, paving the roads, etc. Speaking of which, if you've driven across the US, you'd notice that roads maintained by toll operations tend to be superior to roads maintained via taxes. That's happening in my area, where they started to charge people for using the mid-town tunnels. Ever since they started that, they had enough money to maintain the tunnels. It didn't stop there. We're starting to see major road repairs in this area beyond what we're used to seeing.

We conservatives believe that the free market does a better job at ensuring the above things than the government. If the free market were allowed to run its course without economy growth restrictive regulations, the government wouldn't have to take more and more of Rey_Lengua's money.

Also, you insinuate that he'd "blindly" vote for a certain group of people simply because they're on the same team. You do realize that the vast majority of the politicians that run for office are rich, do you? Rich people exist in both parties, and there are plenty of rich people, in both parties, in Congress.

You should be bitching about people consistently voting for quasi socialists who implement policies that slow economic growth at best, lead to economic stagnation/downturn at worst. Those democrats don't give a shit about you, or about those that vote for them. Yes, they were the party of slavery. Sometime in the 20th Century, they advocated policies that replaced segregation with economic chains. Except, today, they don't just have blacks on the economic plantation. They have people of all races, mainly libtards, in the economic plantation ready to provide bale after bale of votes.

You people are useful idiots for the Democrats, not just to our enemies.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by herfacechair

You see, this is what I meant by WombRaider projecting his traits onto us.



You're missing the point. Nowhere, in the post that you replied to, is he arguing that he shouldn't pay any taxes at all. He's arguing against the idea that we pay more and more taxes towards an inefficient mechanism when it comes to impacting the free market economy. He would like to keep more of what he earns so that he could have more money to spend. That's a reasonable expectation, one that unites members of both parties.

The facts indicate that when everybody, especially the rich and super rich (economic engine) keep more of their money, tax revenues collected tend to go up. This is a fact that repeats itself all over the world where people are allowed to keep more of their money, as opposed to people being left with less and less money to spend on their own.

With more tax revenues, and with efficient spending, money could be spent for filtering water, inspecting food, paving the roads, etc. Speaking of which, if you've driven across the US, you'd notice that roads maintained by toll operations tend to be superior to roads maintained via taxes. That's happening in my area, where they started to charge people for using the mid-town tunnels. Ever since they started that, they had enough money to maintain the tunnels. It didn't stop there. We're starting to see major road repairs in this area beyond what we're used to seeing.

We conservatives believe that the free market does a better job at ensuring the above things than the government. If the free market were allowed to run its course without economy growth restrictive regulations, the government wouldn't have to take more and more of Rey_Lengua's money.

Also, you insinuate that he'd "blindly" vote for a certain group of people simply because they're on the same team. You do realize that the vast majority of the politicians that run for office are rich, do you? Rich people exist in both parties, and there are plenty of rich people, in both parties, in Congress.

You should be bitching about people consistently voting for quasi socialists who implement policies that slow economic growth at best, lead to economic stagnation/downturn at worst. Those democrats don't give a shit about you, or about those that vote for them. Yes, they were the party of slavery. Sometime in the 20th Century, they advocated policies that replaced segregation with economic chains. Except, today, they don't just have blacks on the economic plantation. They have people of all races, mainly libtards, in the economic plantation ready to provide bale after bale of votes.

You people are useful idiots for the Democrats, not just to our enemies.

woomby good about projecting, reflecting, rimming and blowing !

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Wouldn't be a friday without a WSJ op piece copied and pasted by LustyTard. Of course it begins with a falsehood, highlighted for your viewing pleasure.

http://thedailybanter.com/2015/01/fo...radical-islam/

[“I’m a writer” – WombRaider]

Your link fails to refute the context that the highlighted sentence was used in. Hint, we’re looking at trend of action versus when he used the term. We’re also looking at the context by which he used the highlighted statement. Nothing in your reply refutes the argument presented in his article.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/01/politi...terrorism-war/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/0...n_6708610.html

[herfacechair]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Cooohhkheee Monthhnther eyeth

Sit DOWN puss in boots in the glory hole booth. Nobody wanted to hear your gibberish.

[herfacechair]

I'm having a blast doing this.

Let me reiterate. It doesn't matter if I don't get back with you tonight, tomorrow, Sunday, the following week, the week after that, the next month, year, decade, etc. I WILL get back with you. My destroying your responses is almost as guaranteed as death and taxes. I'm gone for days? I'll be back, guaranteed. The longer I'm gone, the longer I'll make this thread when I do come back.

Also, don't forget to answer those questions, I'll keep repeating them in my replies to you if you fail to answer them per the parameters that I set. They won't answer themselves.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Failed immensely? Seems you've birthed another lie right before our eyes. Half of America supports it. That seems to call bullshit on your 'immense' failure to persuade.

Polling is another area where you show immense ignorance, sewer rat. Here is the link to the Pew poll conducted Sept. 3-7 on a random sample of 1,004 Americans. Pew summarized the results as follows:

"Currently, just 21% approve of the agreement on Iran’s nuclear program reached between the United States, Iran and other nations. Nearly half (49%) disapprove of the agreement, while three-in-ten (30%) offer no opinion."

http://www.people-press.org/2015/09/...reement-falls/

Pew Research Center is a highly reputable polling firm. The link contains plenty of details regarding their methods and sources. People who understand polls respect them. But go ahead and call them liars if it makes you feel better, you ignorant cunt.

By the way, isn't it revealing how support for the Iran deal has steadily eroded over the two months since it was announced? Seems like that "conversation" Odumbo wanted us all to have isn't going too well for him, is it sewer rat? Maybe that's why he is letting Senate Democrats filibuster the deal instead of having a "robust debate" followed by an up-and-down vote on the Senate floor. If the conversation doesn't go his way, Odumbo wants to shut it down. That's real leadership for you!

.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by gnadfly

Not provable. How many houses did you sell?

How is it provable that there was a better deal possible?

I can play this game better than you and have proven it over and over.

[WTF]

Originally Posted by herfacechair

[color=blue]I know that JDB is also a veteran. /color]

Only combat JDB has seen is a cock fight on a Navy ship.

You have no concept about debt and funding these wsrs you so love...waste of time to actually debate with but i do love to ridicule you.

Are you Lindsey Graham's gay war mongering lover? You two would make a cute couple !


.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WTF

You War Mongers do not understand that if you do not capture in spoils, more than you spend in capturing those spoils....than your war piggy bank dries up.

Originally Posted by WTF

You have no concept about debt and funding these wars you so love....

What WTFagboy is trying to say is he strongly supported the Iraq war until he found out Bushie Boy was too much of a wimp to seize the Iraqi oilfields and apply 100% of the proceeds from selling the daily output to recoup our costs of being there.

In other words, WTFagboy believes in "to the victor go the spoils" but Bushie Boy let him down.
.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

What WTFagboy is trying to say is he strongly supported the Iraq war until he found out Bushie Boy was too much of a wimp to seize the Iraqi oilfields and apply 100% of the proceeds from selling the daily output to recoup our costs of being there.

In other words, WTFagboy believes in "to the victor go the spoils" but Bushie Boy let him down.
.

Using the oil profits to fund the war was one of the biggest lies they ever told. What a crock of shit.

[WombRaider]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Polling is another area where you show immense ignorance, sewer rat. Here is the link to the Pew poll conducted Sept. 3-7 on a random sample of 1,004 Americans. Pew summarized the results as follows:

"Currently, just 21% approve of the agreement on Iran’s nuclear program reached between the United States, Iran and other nations. Nearly half (49%) disapprove of the agreement, while three-in-ten (30%) offer no opinion."

http://www.people-press.org/2015/09/...reement-falls/

Pew Research Center is a highly reputable polling firm. The link contains plenty of details regarding their methods and sources. People who understand polls respect them. But go ahead and call them liars if it makes you feel better, you ignorant cunt.

By the way, isn't it revealing how support for the Iran deal has steadily eroded over the two months since it was announced? Seems like that "conversation" Odumbo wanted us all to have isn't going too well for him, is it sewer rat? Maybe that's why he is letting Senate Democrats filibuster the deal instead of having a "robust debate" followed by an up-and-down vote on the Senate floor. If the conversation doesn't go his way, Odumbo wants to shut it down. That's real leadership for you!

.

Half disapprove... half the people never agree on anything. That means absolutely nothing. He's no interested in a debate, but it isn't a debate with you people. He doesn't need to listen to you shitstains. He's the motherfucking president and you should approach him on your goddamn knees.

[Guest040616]

Originally Posted by lustylad

What WTFagboy is trying to say is he strongly supported the Iraq war until he found out Bushie Boy was too much of a wimp to seize the Iraqi oilfields and apply 100% of the proceeds from selling the daily output to recoup our costs of being there.

You're wrong!

Those of us (including WTF, LLIdiot, Turdy the Turdfly, myself and a few others) who regularly posted in ASPD's Houston Pig Pen when the invasion actually occurred, knows that WTF opposed it prior to Shrubbie's final authorization of the ill fated and ill advised Spring of 2003 invasion of Iraq.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

Using the oil profits to fund the war was one of the biggest lies they ever told.

So you agree with fagboy that it was a good idea if only we had followed through and funded the war properly by taking over the oilfields.... thanks for clarifying that, sewer rat.

.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by WombRaider

He's the motherfucking president and you should approach him on your goddamn knees.

You mean like Putin does? Or Khamenei? Or Assad (especially when he draws a red line)?

Did you promise you would "approach him on your goddamn knees" when he visits one of your gloryholes?
.