BAT SHIT CRAZY TO ANOTHER LEVEL- ECCIE2NDAVE- MAKE IT RIGHT FOR EVELYN CRUZ -PROVIDERS PLEASE BE AWARE OF THIS LUNATIC

[N.M.]

~ double post

[N.M.]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

GS, you know exactly how that works. It is impossible to unring that bell.

What you said in your other post is what I enjoy the most when ish like this goes down.

To look at the bitter coed gremlins think that you have done harm to me and/or my business LOL while business and life is nothing but poppin' as usual
It's almost as good as watching you show me every time how powerless and irrelevant you are on this board.

If threads like this would hurt my business, don't you think that I would have been out of business since last year?
Do you know why ish like this is irrelevant to my business??
Quite simple really:

Because "You do what you WANT, when you poppin''"!



Simple right? And when you finally learn to accept that fact, the less complicated your life would be. Just accept the facts is really not that hard.

Natalia Mori, is still gonna slay you simple minded bitches, she will still speak her mind whenever she feels the need to, she will still be and do GREAT. Because that's what GREAT people do.
No matter how many lies y'all pull outta your sore asses...

"Nothing REAL can be threaten" *in HOV's voice

Accept those facts and...

[dearhunter]

I am here for you......see, we are both happy.

When you are pounding that RTM, because I am here for you.......I will still be here for you.

[gtoman]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

gtoman., there are many factors involved which you will never be privy to. But, you want to know the lowest level. Here ya go.

Proof it is real : Hooker writes a response thread in coed where she praises your mighty acts with her on the date of your appointment.

Proof it is fake: Owner tells us that your review is fake because that provider spent the entire month before your date of appointment in Hawaii with him.

Either one of those are definite proof. Anything else is a lower level of proof.

So, the only way to validate your review is if the hooker/whore writes a statement to validate your review? That is a good bit shortsighted.

I am not sure who you mean by "owner" in that second statement. Are you referring to the owner of the entire Forum? Are your saying that NM or EC in Hawaii for a month before this the owner of the forum? Pardon me if your statement of what makes it fake doesn't seem to match up here.

What you still are not providing the Reviewers with is a minimum baseline for what they should supply if a review of theirs comes into question. Why is that? Can you not quantify or specify it? Therefore, making it a moving target each and every time.

Originally Posted by Pistolero

And after reading this : The existence of the review is proof it happened.

I do not think I can add further to this conversation..

Are you suggesting this was my statement? If so, you need to go back and reread the thread.

[GlobeSpotter]

Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

.......

Natalia Mori, is still gonna slay you simple minded bitches, she will still speak her mind whenever she feels the need to, she will still be and do GREAT. Because that's what GREAT people do.
No matter how many lies y'all pull outta your sore asses...

Love those third person posts.

[gtoman]

Originally Posted by submarineracer

So what you are inferring is this site will now be like TER, where any hooker can cry about a review and it will be removed. WEAK

Ding ding ding, winner winner, chicken dinner!

[dearhunter]

No, gtoman. E2D knew exactly what he was doing when he wrote that review. He doesn't give a shit some modtard declared it fake. This is the threAD he wanted. A broken English statement from EC saying the session did not happen, followed by silence, would have been the winning play. That is not what the smartest whore in the room did. But, it is all good. The BSC whore is winning.

[Guest020719]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Admit it, E2D.......you are kinda creepy........ijs...

Finally something we agree on

Originally Posted by dearhunter

What PistolPete is telling you...

Pushing 22.5k posts and not one review - That does not make you someone with any credibility here on this topic, imo, nor am I saying that I am, but I do inderstand process very very well.

If this had happened more than just this once, within any noticable period of time, this whole topic may have warranted some kind of scrutiny, but it has not. So it does not. Combine that with the previous obvious stalker / hate posting agenda of e2d and there is really no grounds to get so ass bent out of shape over this one time occurance.

Real threAD winner: eccie banner sales reps.

P.s. - those of you who hate the mod's management of this site are free to leave and never return. I am sure you can create your own site an have much better success. Good day.

[gtoman]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

No, gtoman. E2D knew exactly what he was doing when he wrote that review. He doesn't give a shit some modtard declared it fake. This is the threAD he wanted. A broken English statement from EC saying the session did not happen, followed by silence, would have been the winning play. That is not what the smartest whore in the room did. But, it is all good. The BSC whore is winning.

HE wanted?

Originally Posted by gtoman

So, the only way to validate your review is if the hooker/whore writes a statement to validate your review.

This is the answer to my own question really because they value certain whore's words over the reviewer who writes something.

It isn't just about E2D's review. It is about all our reviews and future reviews. The entire rebuttal process here leaves every reviewer exposed to a rebuttal by anyone who doesn't agree with their review. This will lead to reviewers putting less effort into their reviews which none of us want.

[dearhunter]

You and I understand that. But, that is an aside to E2Ds goal with that review. The cluster fuck created by the modtards is icing on the cake for him.

Natalia said it. E2Ds goal was to attack her. She did not post this rebuttal because Evelyn Cruz is an illiterate whore. She posted this rebuttal. Because, she (Natalia) saw the review as an attack against her. She admitted it in this threAD. She played the Houston modtards for suckers with her excuse that Evelyn is incapable of defending herself. This has always been about shit that Natalia is fighting on other boards.

You and I understand that Natalia is not entitled to special posting privileges for another whore that the rest of the whores would not then be entitled to. The retards sucking Natalia's dick don't care about that. When you are in for a penny you are in for the pound.

[bobbeemagee]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

According to whom? The only place I've ever seen that mentioned is the political forum. What's your other handle? Nevermind, you'll mess up eventually, they always do...

.

According to common sense, that's whom. I will give you some examples in a bit.

Is this how you treat all new posters? Have you ever messed up? Or are you perfect?

I say you've already messed up mightily on this thread.

I'm sure you have heard of Redbook. Remember that, I did not randomly throw it out there but I'm not sure if I will connect the dots for you.

You do understand the state of Texas has put a huge amount of money into investigating Human Trafficking? Natalia's post smack of all the elements. You have a young girl [EC] from another country whose account is controlled by another escort from another country also. Thrown in the Black Pimp angle and it is a trifecta!

But it gets better....you as a represented of eccie, decided to sanction the whole fiasco.

So Redbook was shut down because they were accused of knowingly letting Human trafficking flourish and you turn around and put eccie is a similar position? And your biggest worry is a second handle?

Ok, I pretty much connected the dots for you.

Go a head and ban me with no proof...be similar in how you have treated this review!

[bobbeemagee]

Originally Posted by Natalia Mori

Natalia Mori, is still gonna slay you simple minded bitches, she will still speak her mind whenever she feels the need to, she will still be and do GREAT. Because that's what GREAT people do.
In fact I will go back and recruit more non-English speaking young girls to come work with/for me and there is nothing you can do about it, there is nothing the Law can do about it because of my greatness! So eat shit bitches! I am the GREATEST

Example...

See Spice, how great Natalia is?

[Wakeup]

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Proof it is real : Hooker writes a response thread in coed where she praises your mighty acts with her on the date of your appointment.

This has no relevance to the "reality" of the review. Hobbyist wants to get review credit and whore wants to get verified. They fabricate a review and she comments on it. How do you think LE gets their whore accounts verified here? Or a way that providers get their mandles? Or that tricks get access to be provider forums?

Originally Posted by Pistolero

Proof it is fake: Owner tells us that your review is fake because that provider spent the entire month before your date of appointment in Hawaii with him.

Again, this has nothing to do with proof of the review. Were you on the trip with them? Is he trying to score points with the provider by helping her get the review removed and agreed to lie on her behalf?

Fact is, there is no evidence that can be provided to prove or disprove the session happened. You all trying to "investigate" is nothing but a bullshit waste of time that opens you up to all sorts of issues you want no part of...like me questioning you actions...

The review goes up. The whore refutes it. The OP of the review admits he made it up, the review gets removed, and he may or may not be punished. The OP of the review stands by his review and y'all do jack shit. Those are your options.

P.S.-Where does guideline 24 allow for a review to be left in view and labeled as "fake"? If you have been given "proof" that its fake, the guideline requires you to remove it.

[GlobeSpotter]

Originally Posted by dearhunter

Natalia ......played the Houston modtards for suckers.....

That turned out to be pretty easy.

But they'll get over it after a few horas of free mod pussy.

Originally Posted by bobbeemagee

......
You do understand the state of Texas has put a huge amount of money into investigating Human Trafficking? Natalia's post smack of all the elements. You have a young girl [EC] from another country whose account is controlled by another escort from another country also. Thrown in the Black Pimp angle and it is a trifecta!
.....

One of the worst elements is (fortunately) missing (that we know of). But your point is made clear.

[SpiceItUp]

Originally Posted by gtoman

This is the answer to my own question really because they value certain whore's words over the reviewer who writes something.

It isn't just about E2D's review. It is about all our reviews and future reviews. The entire rebuttal process here leaves every reviewer exposed to a rebuttal by anyone who doesn't agree with their review. This will lead to reviewers putting less effort into their reviews which none of us want.

Yes for every review a rebuttal thread is possible. The ladies may not be able to participate in the review forums but they are free to speak their minds elsewhere, and a coed rebuttal is open to them as an option of course not only for a fake review but also for anything else they may have to say about a review or member. This is a discussion forum, people discuss things.

As for taking one person's word over another, well, reading comprehension is a valuable skill. Your question was asked and answered you just didn't like the response apparently. Allow me to quote it again for you.

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Save whatever you like, each case is unique.

But no, it's actually the opposite usually. 95%+ of the time it's a "he said, she said" where the truth of the matter is impossible to discern. In that event we leave the review in place and let the members decide for themselves what is true. Unlike other sites that remove reviews based solely upon a provider calling foul, we do not do that here at all.

In the rare event, and it is relatively rare, that we are 100% certain, given the information at hand, only then do we remove the review from her profile and mark it as fake.

This is a site for information exchange. When at all possible the staff stay out of it and let members participate as they see fit.

You don't like the fact that we're not giving you a point by point analysis of this or any other case up for moderator adjudication? Too bad. We don't publicly discuss the details of such matters nor will we make it easier for people to get away with fake reviews or other violations by revealing our specific methodology or criteria. Not only is every case unique but much is left to moderator discretion and discernment.

Scroll up and read the long post by Mythos. He basically nailed it. We do the best we can with imperfect information in a sea of gray areas. There are typically multiple moderators, and admins oftentimes, involved in the decision making processes. The evidence, such as it is, is weighed and after deliberation a conclusion arrived at.

If you or anyone else think the 4 mods and 3 admins who weighed in on this particular case were somehow playing favorites, that is asinine and I've got a tin foil hat for you. You know, to keep the government from reading your thoughts.