Iran Cheated On Odumbo Before The Ink On The Treaty Was Dry.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Did read the any of the prior posts (the last 10)? Or did you come to the last post and expect to know what went on in the last 10?

The Iran deal was signed in June 2014. A safe guards (IAEA) Iran report was done in September 2014. In that report it is confirmed that Iran got rid of its "weapons grade uranium). See Post 606 bullet #5.

The point being made in the last post was that Iran had options for how they could get rid of their "weapons grade uranium". They could have sold it or diluted it down. The last post was answering a question that was raised prior to that.

The link that did not work, was a copy of the link in post #572 and it works in post #572. Maybe a character got truncated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action

Odumbo didn't confirm shit, and Iran cheated from day one.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Did you read the any of the prior posts (the last 10)? Or did you come to the last post and expect to know what went on in the last 10?

The Iran deal was signed in June 2014. A safe guards (IAEA) Iran report was done in September 2014. In that report it was confirmed that Iran got rid of its "weapons grade uranium). See Post 606 bullet #5.

The point being made in the last post was that Iran had options for how they could get rid of their "weapons grade uranium". They could have sold it or diluted it down. The last post was answering a question that was raised prior to that.


so you don't know what happened to it. got it.

The link that did not work, was a copy of the link in post #572 and it works in post #572. Maybe a character got truncated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action

posting the same link to Wikipedia over and over doesn't make it true.

you have more chinks in your armour than a chinese phone book.

but keep believing. in some alternate universe the Iranians might be peaceful people. instead of radical Islamist's.


BAHHAHASAAAAAA

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

[COLOR=blue]

but keep believing. in some alternate universe the Iranians might be peaceful people. instead of radical Islamist's.

Which is why so many prefer to be called "Persians" when desiring to intermingle with civilized Westerners. Iranian and Nazis are effectively synonymous today from not only their dictatorial political system, but also with respect to the international ambitions.

See many "Iranian" providers advertising on Eccie?

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Did you read the any of the prior posts (the last 10)? Or did you come to the last post and expect to know what went on in the last 10?

The Iran deal was signed in June 2014. A safe guards (IAEA) Iran report was done in September 2014. In that report it was confirmed that Iran got rid of its "weapons grade uranium). See Post 606 bullet #5.

The point being made in the last post was that Iran had options for how they could get rid of their "weapons grade uranium". They could have sold it or diluted it down. The last post was answering a question that was raised prior to that.

The link that did not work, was a copy of the link in post #572 and it works in post #572. Maybe a character got truncated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_...Plan_of_Action

Did you even read your own quoted wiki article. As late as 2016 "exemptions" were already being made regarding the "weapons grade urnanium".

Exemptions
Reuters reported that exemptions were granted to Iran prior to 16 January 2016. The reported purpose of the exemptions was so that sanctions relief and other benefits could start by that date, instead of Iran being in violation. The exemptions included: (a) Iran able to exceed the 300 Kg of 3.5% LEU limit in the agreement; (b) Iran able to exceed the zero Kg of 20% LEU limit in the agreement; (c) Iran to keep operating 19 "hot cells" that exceed the size limit in the agreement; (d) Iran to maintain control of 50 tonnes of heavy water that exceed the 130 tonne limit in the agreement by storing the excess at an Iran-controlled facility in Oman.[99] In December 2016, the IAEA published decisions of the Joint Commission that spell out these clarifications of the JCPOA.[100]

So by early 2016 no one still knew shit about what Iran was actually violating or adhering to in the agreement.

Keep trying, it's not working.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

posting the same link to Wikipedia over and over doesn't make it true.

you have more chinks in your armour than a chinese phone book.

but keep believing. in some alternate universe the Iranians might be peaceful people. instead of radical Islamist's.


BAHHAHASAAAAAA

One more time. From YOUR Link, post #606 bullet #5.


5) Iran has not produced uranium hexafluoride enriched above 5 percent and its entire stock enriched up to 20 percent has been either downbleded or fed into the conversion process producing an oxide form. However, Iran possesses a significant quantity of near 20percent LEU oxide which can be reconverted back to hexalufluorideform;

"20 percent has been downbleded or fed into conversion process producing oxide form" The scientist Albright is saying it WAS diluted. The term 20 percent LEU = "weapons grade uranium".

Go look up or Google these two words "Uranium Downblending".

No chinks in my armor. Are you questioning your own link?

The constraint was Iran had to get rid of their "weapons grade uranium" and according to Albright from your link, they did.

[eccielover]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

One more time. From YOUR Link, post #606 bullet #5.


5) Iran has not produced uranium hexafluoride enriched above 5 percent and its entire stock enriched up to 20 percent has been either downbleded or fed into the conversion process producing an oxide form. However, Iran possesses a significant quantity of near 20percent LEU oxide which can be reconverted back to hexalufluorideform;

"20 percent has been downbleded or fed into conversion process producing oxide form" The scientist Albright is saying it WAS diluted. The term 20 percent LEU = "weapons grade uranium".

Go look up or Google these two words "Uranium Downblending".

No chinks in my armor. Are you questioning your own link?

The constraint was Iran had to get rid of their "weapons grade uranium" and according to Albright from your link, they did.

But depending on the exact timeframe you are discussing, Iran was given the exemptions I pointed out from your own article.

If the data was "confirmed", why were exceptions needed?

I'll tell you why, because the actual oversight and enforcement process was a joke to make "believe" things were under control.

Does indeed seem like chinks in your armor.

[LexusLover]

Originally Posted by eccielover

.... the actual oversight and enforcement process was a joke to make "believe" things were under control.

... there's more "OVERSIGHT" of a DWI violator in this country than over the Iranian NUCLEAR ARSENAL "program"!

But the IntoxicatedSocialistLiberalAnt iTrumpers want to chant the same bullshit they spouted out regarding the Iraqi WMD program "OVERSIGHT" BY THE UN!!!!!!

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by eccielover

But depending on the exact timeframe you are discussing, Iran was given the exemptions I pointed out from your own article.

If the data was "confirmed", why were exceptions needed?

Does indeed seem like chinks in your armor.

Did you click on footnote 100 in the exemptions that you copied and pasted. This link explains why the exceptions were granted.

You actually thought you had some kind "gotcha moment". You think the scientists at the IAEA are a bunch of absent minded professors who don't know what they are doing.

No chinks in the armor. Iran does not have and can't get a nuclear weapon. The major constraints of the agreement are being followed.

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/f...infcirc907.pdf

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbo didn't confirm sh*t.

Obama is not a scientist. However, your guy Albright is. He use to be an inspector at the IAEA. You remember him right, he is the same guy that Bengy N. gave the stolen documents to read. Albright is the one who confirmed that Iran's "weapons grade" uranium was diluted down. It's amazing how quickly you forget about your sources when they don't tell you what you wish to hear.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Did you click on footnote 100 in the exemptions that you copied and pasted. This link explains why the exceptions were granted.

You actually thought you had some kind "gotcha moment". You think the scientists at the IAEA are a bunch of absent minded professors who don't know what they are doing.

No chinks in the armor. Iran does not have and can't get a nuclear weapon. The major constraints of the agreement are being followed.

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/f...infcirc907.pdf

arya .. sure of that? do you mean to say that Iran can't do what we all know North Korea has done? Iran is by far a more prosperous nation with vast oil resources.

where's the Uranium? you admitted you don't know. can you prove Iran does not still have it?


your faith in Obama's deal and the so-called ironclad surveillance is child-like in it's nativity, like an adult who still believes in Santa Clause and the Easter Bunny.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Obama is not a scientist. However, your guy Albright is. He use to be an inspector at the IAEA. You remember him right, he is the same guy that Bengy N. gave the stolen documents to read. Albright is the one who confirmed that Iran's "weapons grade" uranium was diluted down. It's amazing how quickly you forget about your sources when they don't tell you what you wish to hear.

Odumbo is the spokesman for the POS agreement that never established via genuine inspections a substantive baseline for Iran's assets and capabilities.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

where's the Uranium? you admitted you don't know. can you prove Iran does not still have it?

Read post #606 bullet #5. Do you know what the word dilute means?
Post #606 is your post. The "weapons grade uranium" that Iran had was diluted down. We have gone over bullet #5 multiple times. Iran will not be able to get a nuclear bomb until they turn on the high-speed centrifuges and start enriching again. They have to follow the process they were doing up until 2014. Their progress is reflected in those graphs/charts that were originally posted by lustylad.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by adav8s28

Read post #606 bullet #5. Do you know what the word dilute means?
Post #606 is your post. The "weapons grade uranium" that Iran had was diluted down. We have gone over bullet #5 multiple times. Iran will not be able to get a nuclear bomb until they turn on the high-speed centrifuges and start enriching again. They have to follow the process they were doing up until 2014. Their progress is reflected in those graphs/charts that were originally posted by lustylad.

did you or did you not post that you don't know?


yes or no.

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbo is the

All of Iran's "weapons grade uranium" was diluted down. Are you calling your guy Albright a liar?

[adav8s28]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

did you or did you not post that you don't know?


yes or no.

NO.