Women for Trump

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Oh you are just so gullible that it is sad.

The recording and the media coverage of it are the perfect encapsulation of the level of dishonest hackery and the outright fraudulent manner in which Pres. Trump has been covered by the press.

What's dishonest about the recording, other than his BS? It's his own words. The whole conversation is available. It was shameful on his part. Anyone with a rational brain and at least a minimum moral compass can see that, unless they're under the spell of that con man.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

What's dishonest about the recording, other than his BS? It's his own words. The whole conversation is available. It was shameful on his part. Anyone with a rational brain and at least a minimum moral compass can see that, unless they're under the spell of that con man.

LOL - because what you are parroting from the fake news media and other moronic Democrats is dishonest and fraudulent. You pick a 15 second soundbite out of a hour long settlement conference and leave out the context of the 15 second statement and all that came before and after it.

Typical of low information gullible types

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by berryberry

The recording and the media coverage of it are the perfect encapsulation of the level of dishonest hackery and the outright fraudulent manner in which Pres. Trump has been covered by the press.

Speaking of how dishonest the media is... the New York Times ran stories on two of the candidates in today's US Senate runoffs in Georgia.

Here's the headline for their profile of Democrat Raphael Warnock:

Raphael Warnock, From the Pulpit to Politics, Doesn’t Shy From ‘Uncomfortable’ Truths

Can you say "puff piece"?

And here's the headline for their profile of Republican David Perdue:

Before Embracing America-First Agenda, David Perdue Was an Outsourcing Expert

Can you say "hit piece"?

It turns out that Rev. Warnock beats his wife, but you would never know that from reading the NYT.

There was a time many years ago When the Grey Lady upheld inviolable standards of journalism. Their slogan was "All the News That's Fit to Print".

Today the NYT operates under the slogan "All the News That the DNC Wants You to Know".

[1pittsburgh]

Originally Posted by berryberry

LOL - because what you are parroting from the fake news media and other moronic Democrats is dishonest and fraudulent. You pick a 15 second soundbite out of a hour long settlement conference and leave out the context of the 15 second statement and all that came before and after it.

Typical of low information gullible types

Why do you continue to make ignorant assumptions? I don't watch cable news. When I read, a variety of sources, some slight right of center, some center, and some slightly left of center, I look for the facts, not the authors opinion. In general, I look for original source information like this shameful phone call for instance. I listened to the whole thing. There's no context that defends it. He brought up the machines fictitiously being moved. The republican said that they weren't moved. He brought up the internals fictitiously being changed. The republican said they weren't changed. He brought up thousands of ballots ficticously being shredded. The republican said that they weren't. He gave veiled threats of legal action. He told the republican that he needs him to find the specific number of votes he would need to beat Biden there, down to the vote. Only the delusional would believe that he wasn't trying to compel the republican secretary of state to cheat.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

He told the republican that he needs him to find the specific number of votes he would need to beat Biden there, down to the vote.

Funny you should mention that. The beauty of "mail-in" ballots, at least for democrats, is that once the in-person polls close, they know exactly how many extra ballots need to be manufactured, down to the vote.

I dare you to read this:

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horow...n-pennsylvania

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

Why do you continue to make ignorant assumptions? I don't watch cable news. When I read, a variety of sources, some slight right of center, some center, and some slightly left of center, I look for the facts, not the authors opinion. In general, I look for original source information like this shameful phone call for instance. I listened to the whole thing. There's no context that defends it. He brought up the machines fictitiously being moved. The republican said that they weren't moved. He brought up the internals fictitiously being changed. The republican said they weren't changed. He brought up thousands of ballots ficticously being shredded. The republican said that they weren't. He gave veiled threats of legal action. He told the republican that he needs him to find the specific number of votes he would need to beat Biden there, down to the vote. Only the delusional would believe that he wasn't trying to compel the republican secretary of state to cheat.

LOL you are just so gullible and ignorant of the facts. It really is laughable

Try educating yourself - it may do you good

[Dreamgurrl]

Originally Posted by 1pittsburgh

What's dishonest about the recording, other than his BS? It's his own words. The whole conversation is available. It was shameful on his part. Anyone with a rational brain and at least a minimum moral compass can see that, unless they're under the spell of that con man.

But when does the mixtape drop though?

1/21/21?

Can’t wait!

[Munchmasterman]

No need to read the article. Your stupidity is there for all to see.

I'll give 3 examples.

In PA, mail in ballots must be received by 8 PM on election day.
In PA, polling locations close at 8 PM on election day. (PA got some extra days but all of the ballots received after 8 PM on election day were isolated from all others)

In GA and AZ, polls close at 7PM on election day. Mail in ballots must be received by.....you guessed it. 7PM on election day.

You don't even know your own state laws let alone other state's laws.

Since the time and date for return of mail in ballots and the polls closing time are the same, your stupid statement about manufacturing extra ballots is "false and baseless" (how do you tell the difference between true and "false and baseless" claims? it's called evidence).

Your article is full of shit. It ignores the actual numbers certified by the state.

Your "logic" isn't. You got caught lying again.

https://www.votespa.com/Voting-in-PA...ions-FAQs.aspx
https://www.azfamily.com/news/politi...ce9f6439e.html
https://sos.ga.gov/admin/uploads/Abs...uide_20142.pdf

Originally Posted by lustylad

Funny you should mention that. The beauty of "mail-in" ballots, at least for democrats, is that once the in-person polls close, they know exactly how many extra ballots need to be manufactured, down to the vote.

I dare you to read this:

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horow...n-pennsylvania

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Your stupidity is there for all to see.

I'll give 3 examples.

In PA, mail in ballots must be received by 8 PM on election day.

As usual, you're insufferably rude - and utterly WRONG right out of the gate.

In PA, they counted mail-in ballots received up to 3 days after the polls closed.


https://www.npr.org/2020/10/19/92241...r-election-day


Stay down there in Texas, munchkin. Don't come up here spreading your misinformation.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

No need to read the article...

Your article is full of shit.

Thank you for your feedback, Mr. Open-Minded Munchassman!

Question - If you're too lazy to read it, how do you even know it's "full of shit"?

Would it help if I told you it has pictures?

[bypass]

The ballots had to be post marked by election day and received by Friday.

[Munchmasterman]

How funny.
I was RIGHT right out of the gate. You were double WRONG right out of the gate. You had a chance to check your work and your hubris once again shows you to be an ass.


You didn't quote my entire post. Once again you sleazed your way through in a response to a post.
You lie by omission on a regular basis.

You're a trumpy. Uneducated and unwilling to call trump on 25000 lies.

Somehow you managed to miss the part of my post that said.

"In PA, polling locations close at 8 PM on election day. (PA got some extra days but all of the ballots received after 8 PM on election day were isolated from all others)".

Which of the 2 reasons above caused you to miss the one part of my post you tried to "refute"?

Probably both.

Below is the part of your voting rules you didn't know.

The Pennsylvania Department of State issued guidance to county election officials on Wednesday instructing them to segregate ballots that arrive after 8 p.m. on Election Day. According to the guidance, these ballots will be processed separately. Nowhere in the guidance does it say those ballots won’t be counted at all.

Pennsylvania law requires that all ballots be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day. The state Supreme Court last month extended the deadline for this election so ballots can be received by mail until 5 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 6 if they are either postmarked by Election Day or have missing or illegible postmarks.

https://www.politifact.com/factcheck...-mail-ballots/


You also failed to mention,

The Pennsylvania Department of State issued guidance to county election officials on Wednesday instructing them to segregate ballots that arrive after 8 p.m. on Election Day. According to the guidance, these ballots will be processed separately.
That instruction was issued so that if any legal issues popped up they wouldn't have to separate those ballots from all mail-in ballots.

I don't have to leave Texas to chastise you and correct your habitual lying. You go ahead and stay in PA where most of your fellow citizens bitch-slapped you and don't believe your bullshit.

Do the people on the PA forum realize how often you make posts like this and then you have your ass handed to you on the national forum?
I said I didn't need to read it to see your stupidity.

I didn't say I didn't read it. As soon as I saw theories to describe an actual count of the votes there was no reason to read further.

Or especially to buy into it.

Like you did.

Originally Posted by lustylad

As usual, you're insufferably rude - and utterly WRONG right out of the gate.

In PA, ballots received up to 3 days after the polls closed.


https://www.npr.org/2020/10/19/92241...r-election-day


Stay down there in Texas, munchkin. Don't come up here spreading your misinformation.






Thank you for your feedback, Mr. Open-Minded Munchassman!

Question - If you're too lazy to read it, how do you even know it's "full of shit"?

Would it help if I told you it has pictures?

[Munchmasterman]

In case you missed it, the wacky kid lasted about as long as bambi.

Both are now banned.

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

How funny.
I was RIGHT right out of the gate. You were double WRONG right out of the gate. You had a chance to check your work and your hubris once again shows you to be an ass.

Who pissed in your Wheaties today, munchkin? Did you get beat up so badly in the Political Forum that you had to limp over here to lick your wounds? Then after I kicked you to the curb, you’re back again to double down on stupid? Seriously?

No, you weren’t right right, you were WRONG WRONG out of the gate. And why did you crop my post? Wtf is wrong with you? Hitting the bottle again?

Here’s what you stupidly and erroneously proclaimed:

In PA, mail in ballots must be received by 8 PM on election day.

That is an ignorant, incorrect and WRONG statement.

I corrected you as follows:

In PA, they counted mail-in ballots received up to 3 days after the polls closed.


Election day was Nov. 3. Due to the unconstitutional edicts of our highly partisan state supreme court, in PA they were allowed to count ballots that were RECEIVED up until 8pm on Friday Nov. 6. We’re talking about mail-in ballots, got that? They were supposed to be POSTMARKED no later than Nov. 3 but they could still be RECEIVED up to 3 days later!

Do I have to explain to you the difference between POSTMARKED and RECEIVED? Please don’t make yourself look any stupider than you already have!

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Somehow you managed to miss the part of my post that said.

"In PA, polling locations close at 8 PM on election day. (PA got some extra days but all of the ballots received after 8 PM on election day were isolated from all others)".

Umm, what’s your point munchy? Or are you trying to make MY point? The part you claim I “missed” explicitly CONFIRMS that ballots can be received after 8pm on election day.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Below is the part of your voting rules you didn't know.

The Pennsylvania Department of State issued guidance to county election officials on Wednesday instructing them to segregate ballots that arrive after 8 p.m. on Election Day. According to the guidance, these ballots will be processed separately. Nowhere in the guidance does it say those ballots won’t be counted at all.

Pennsylvania law requires that all ballots be received by 8 p.m. on Election Day. The state Supreme Court last month extended the deadline for this election so ballots can be received by mail until 5 p.m. on Friday, Nov. 6 if they are either postmarked by Election Day or have missing or illegible postmarks.

[url]https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/oct/29/justin-clark/fact-checking-trump-campaign-tweet-pa-mail-ballots/


You also failed to mention,

The Pennsylvania Department of State issued guidance to county election officials on Wednesday instructing them to segregate ballots that arrive after 8 p.m. on Election Day. According to the guidance, these ballots will be processed separately.
That instruction was issued so that if any legal issues popped up they wouldn't have to separate those ballots from all mail-in ballots.

Curb your arrogance. Once again, do you have a point to make? Ballots could be received late up to 3 days late and still be counted. Do you even know WHY late ballots were supposed to be segregated? It was because the SCOTUS instructed them to do it. Funny how you didn’t you mention that part. Is it because you’re the one who doesn’t “know the voting rules” or where they came from?

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I don't have to leave Texas to chastise you and correct your habitual lying. You go ahead and stay in PA where most of your fellow citizens bitch-slapped you and don't believe your bullshit.

Well, thanks for making an uninvited appearance and putting your abysmal ignorance on full display for the amusement of Keystone State mongers. Are you begging me to return to the Political Forum? Do you miss being my bitch? Good times, good times. There are so many PF threads where I thoroughly enjoyed whipping your ass - I don't even know where to start!

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Do the people on the PA forum realize how often you make posts like this and then you have your ass handed to you on the national forum?

Stop stirring up shit, munchassman. I am feared and respected here. You, on the other hand, are a rude interloper. I‘m already getting PMs asking who the fuck does this dickmuncher asshole think he is?

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I said I didn't need to read it to see your stupidity.

I didn't say I didn't read it. As soon as I saw theories to describe an actual count of the votes there was no reason to read further.

Or especially to buy into it.

Like you did.

I didn’t double down on stupid - you did!

As for the article you refuse to read, I didn’t “buy into” anything. But it sounds like your ADD kicked in again. We all know you can’t read more than a single paragraph, drunk or sober, without totally losing your feckless concentration. Plus you lack the intellectual curiosity to read the article due to your well-grounded fears of uncovering democrat misdeeds… move along folks, nothing to see here! So here's the last paragraph for you to digest. No conclusions, just an admonition for anyone who insists we should simply “move on” and not drill down any further for answers:

“These are not conclusions or closing arguments, but these observations definitely warrant further investigation... The suggestion that we should somehow move on from this is a greater threat to democracy than anything in our history. Republicans who think they can just walk away from this without controversy will learn the hard way in the years to come about their inability to win against this novel form of electioneering. After all, we live in a time of "the new normal."”

[lustylad]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

In case you missed it, the wacky kid lasted about as long as bambi.

Both are now banned.

Why aren't YOU banned? You barge into the Pittsburgh sandbox to call me stupid, uneducated and an ass. You left out your favorite epithet - "cocksucker". Go ahead. I know you're itching to use it. It might just earn you the points you need.

[Munchmasterman]

"Feared and respected"?
Just like there is wide spread voter fraud, right?

Just as funny is your PM claim and your "uninvited" statement.

Take your "uninvited" comment and laugh at it like I do. It is truly worthy of a punk-ass bitch.

The posts are there for all to see. You cropped and lied about it. I'm sure "your" forum has seen that when you are pressed, you go with what you know. You play the drinking card.
When confronted with your bullshit you lie and let me knw you're "feared and respected".

Funny you would say feared before respected.

By people who PM you about me? People who ask your opinion instead of looking for themselves? People who fear and respect you so much they don't respond to my posts?

It looks like people who don't give a shit about me like to see your nuts driven up into your throat.

You were nothing before and now you are even less without wacky and bambi.
Now you are like all bullies.

A lying coward.