Absentee / Mail In Ballots and Election Fraud by the Democrats

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by berryberry

If that is the truth, then you should have no problem providing us an actual link to the law that prohibits this. And you would know which specific state you are talking about.

And here, I will even give you some help. In Georgia, there is a 150-foot zone outside polling places where food and water or other drinks cannot be given out. This is similar to the law in Texas and other states so people can't provide an inducement to vote for a certain candidate close to the polling station. But outside that 150 foot zone, there are no restrictions

So please provide the link to the actual state and actual law you are referring to



LOL - you do realize don't you that there is absolutely nothing middle of the road or fair (not "fare") about CBS, ABC, NBC. They are left wing propaganda sites. They exist to dupe unsuspecting people

Perhaps if you would explore non left wing news sites, you may have a different and more accurate perspective. But if you insist on continuing to be fed misinformation from the likes of CBS, ABC, NBC - then nothing will change

Berry, It is true, and if I proved it with something for you to read would you? would you believe it anyway? No, so I am not wasting my time. Don't believe anything I say cause I am a neutral person on here, I hate them all.

Kid, magic words on your post to show me, LEANS LEFT,NOT TOTAL LEFT. ALL OF YOUR NEWS GROUPS ARE MAGA TOTAL RIGHT, NOT ONE STATEMENT THAT THE DEMOCRATS EVER DID ONE GOOD THING.

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

true or false ...


the DEMOCRATS claimed 2016 was "stolen" from Clinton


Stolen, rigged and illegitimate: Democrats’ long history of objecting to election results

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ats-long-hist/

Yes questioned the election for a reason, one state Florida in question that Bushes brother was the governor of. Could you imagine if Trump lost by one state that Biden's brother was governor of? You guys would still be at the capital crying, killing, rioting.

They counted the votes and counted the votes again and again and every time Gore got closer to winning. I lived it. Then Gores team accepted losing and no RIOTS, No Killing Guards, trying to hang the Vice President which would have been Gore or the speaker. No Proud Boys, Took it like a man, not a chump. They didn't cry three years later.

Not like 2020 millions of votes difference and every recount, Biden won even more votes.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Cody69

Yes questioned the election for a reason, one state Florida in question that Bushes brother was the governor of. Could you imagine if Trump lost by one state that Biden's brother was governor of? You guys would still be at the capital crying, killing, rioting.

They counted the votes and counted the votes again and again and every time Gore got closer to winning. I lived it. Then Gores team accepted losing and no RIOTS, No Killing Guards, trying to hang the Vice President which would have been Gore or the speaker. No Proud Boys, Took it like a man, not a chump. They didn't cry three years later.

Not like 2020 millions of votes difference and every recount, Biden won even more votes.

would you just stop claiming that? you know it's not true.

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

would you just stop claiming that? you know it's not true.

This trend isn't about Gore getting Fucked. Everyone already remembers how that transcribed. Gore got fucked in the Ass and accepted that, bleed a little bit and let it go. This trend is about absentee/mail in ballots.


We need election reform where everyone can vote off there computer at home without leaving there house and being threatened like it is now. We also need to get rid of the electoral votes and make it like it should be, popular votes. That way no politics involved. That way they can say, it was a fair and honest election. What the people want.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

true or false ...


the DEMOCRATS claimed 2016 was "stolen" from Clinton


Stolen, rigged and illegitimate: Democrats’ long history of objecting to election results

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ats-long-hist/

Yeah, but they CONCEDE. Once they do, they're private citizens with opinions just like everyone else.

Please don't pretend you can't see the massive difference between conceding and not conceding an election. It's insulting to everyone's intelligence. Conceding an election is actually one of the bedrock principles that America was founded on. To not concede an election is entirely unAmerican - it's banana republic bullshit.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Cody69

I seen what I am talking about either in Georgia, NC, SC or Alabama one of those states that had blacks ride in the back of the bus years ago. They still try doing things to them. That is the truth

Originally Posted by Cody69

Berry, It is true, and if I proved it with something for you to read would you? would you believe it anyway? No, so I am not wasting my time. Don't believe anything I say cause I am a neutral person on here, I hate them all.

So you can't provide a link to prove your statement.

OK - Thank you for confirming that it is NOT true. Again, if it was true, then you should have no problem easily providing us an actual link to the law that prohibits this. And you would know which specific state you are talking about.

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by berryberry

So you can't provide a link to prove your statement.

OK - Thank you for confirming that it is NOT true. Again, if it was true, then you should have no problem easily providing us an actual link to the law that prohibits this. And you would know which specific state you are talking about.

Honestly, I not going to prove anything, you are a lot smarter than any one here, you tell us that everyday. If I seen it on TV, you seen it. You don't watch the truth anyway or you wouldn't think like you do.

Everyone of you guys have seen it. It is a shame how they treat the blacks down south. In Pittsburgh to me they at least an equal. Not down south and you know it.

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Cody69

Honestly, I not going to prove anything.

Because clearly you can't. If you could you would provide a link to the actual law to prove your point. But those restrictions don't exist

[Cody69]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Because clearly you can't. If you could you would provide a link to the actual law to prove your point. But those restrictions don't exist

Here Berry, how long did that take? Two minutes. Will you read and if you did not have some BS comment how untrue it is. NO WAY IN HELL.

You want me to post more??


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...er-wait-times/

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/17/92452...few-polling-pl

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wo...s/waiting-vote

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by Cody69

Here Berry, how long did that take? Two minutes. Will you read and if you did not have some BS comment how untrue it is. NO WAY IN HELL.

You want me to post more??


https://thehill.com/homenews/campaig...er-wait-times/

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/17/92452...few-polling-pl

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-wo...s/waiting-vote

OMG - you didn't even address the question. You claimed

Not letting them have someone give them water or food after numerous hours of standing in line

The question was if that is the truth, then you should have no problem providing us an actual link to the law that prohibits someone giving out food and water. And you would know which specific state you are talking about.

And here, I will even give you some help. In Georgia, there is a 150-foot zone outside polling places where food and water or other drinks cannot be given out. This is similar to the law in Texas and other states so people can't provide an inducement to vote for a certain candidate close to the polling station. But outside that 150 foot zone, there are no restrictions

So please provide the link to the actual state and actual law you are referring to

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

when the Democrats and Biden cry foul over voter laws it's because they don't want any checks on voting at all. what exactly is wrong with having to show an ID to vote? do you really think minorities are so incapable of existing in American society that the vast majority don't have an ID?

blacks especially among minorities are extremely upset that liberal "white guilt" idiots claim they are so "incompetent" they can't even get an ID nor go to a polling location and vote.


you should watch this .. actual black people on voting

enjoy!


then those "repressed minorities" tell the truth!

What you have show is two cities; Berkeley CA and NYC. Possibly two of the most progressive cities for things like access to the internet and a requirement for daily life having ID's. That's just a small microcosm of people, and would decidedly have a much more sophisticated knowledge of urban life, including how to manage where to get general internet use/ information and how to get ID information.

Go to Mississippi and tell me about how sophisticated those folks are, and how much access they have. Here's a better source of information that is salient to the question, vs. the man on the street version you posted.


https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewe...8c68a6153796b7

The link is for the US where blacks have and don't have access to the internet. Once you get away from large populations, it's pretty distinctly different; which Ari didnt' do. He went to two of the largest population centers. Those folks in urban populations are not going to have the same issues as rural folks

Check out other states like Alabama and see what that shows. It's a shame that this even needs to be pointed out but, not only do you need to see the lack of access, but knowledge on what's required. Many of these ppl don't do one thing online. Nothing- so it's fiction to compare the two.

Who' still isn't using the internet?

Here's a link-
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-re....,8%2C%202021.

Pew says its usually not so much race, but age and income that are the biggest reasons for a lack of adoption: "Internet non-adoption is linked to a number of demographic variables, but is strongly connected to age – with older Americans continuing to be one of the least likely groups to use the internet. Today, 25% of adults ages 65 and older report never going online, compared with much smaller shares of adults under the age of 65.

Educational attainment and household income are also indicators of a person’s likelihood to be offline. Some 14% of adults with a high school education or less do not use the internet, but that share falls as the level of educational attainment increases. Adults living in households earning less than $30,000 a year are far more likely than those whose annual household income is $75,000 or more to report not using the internet (14% vs. 1%)."

and when it comes to blacks having ID in non urban areas- there is no discount that Blacks have less "valid Photo ID", than non-black groups.

https://phys.org/news/2023-04-young-...ification.html

Members of underrepresented racial and ethnic groups were less likely to have a current driver's license or other government-issued photo ID. An estimated 1.86 million Black non-Hispanic Americans (6.2%) and 1.86 million Hispanic Americans (6.1%) lack a photo ID, as do 4.5% of those who identify as Native American, Native Alaskan or another race. This compares to just 2.3% of White non-Hispanic Americans and 1.6% of Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander Americans. So essentially blacks and non white's are 8 x's more likely to not have Photo ID than whites; and its more magnified the further away from metropolises you go.


So a guy who makes Youtube videos in an urban culture area is certain to find people who have ID and know how to use the internet...that's seems like a big NON-Shocker to me. But declaring the entire question as debunked, and solved is hardly a conclusion that we can say we've solved. Tell ARI to go out to bum-fuck rural counties in the south, ...white's blacks, old and young, don't have the ID's and they don't have internet in many cases.

[Dr-epg]

Gentlemen time to stop the trading of barbs and get back on topic

[berryberry]

Don’t forget, The NY Times knew IN 2012 about the issues with mail-in balloting.

“As More Vote by Mail, Faulty Ballots Could Impact Elections”

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/u...elections.html

[tommy156]

Lol

[berryberry]

Originally Posted by berryberry

Don’t forget, The NY Times knew IN 2012 about the issues with mail-in balloting.

“As More Vote by Mail, Faulty Ballots Could Impact Elections”

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/u...elections.html

Guess the leftists don't know what to say when even the far left NY Times called out the issues with mail in balloting