Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 650
MoneyManMatt 490
Jon Bon 408
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Starscream66 289
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 280
sharkman29 260
Top Posters
DallasRain71028
biomed165070
Yssup Rider61777
gman4453911
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling49139
WTF48267
pyramider46388
bambino43244
The_Waco_Kid38332
CryptKicker37323
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-07-2021, 10:12 AM   #46
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Would I be more comfortable if the projections going forward were for deficits closer to 3% of GDP instead of flatlining around 5%? Of course I would! The only way to get there is to cut federal spending. Start with the recommendations of the Erskine-Bowles Commission. Surely you remember that bipartisan commission set up by odumbo back in 2010, dontcha? Oh wait, odumbo rejected their bipartisan recommendations. He didn't want to trim the growth in entitlement spending. So he rejected the work of his own bipartisan commission


You are caught lying once again. It needed a super majority to "pass".

Even at that a similar bill was introduced and bombed in the House


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nati...ity_and_Reform


The Commission's recommendations were politically controversial.[3] Under the executive order that created the commission, a supermajority of 14 of the 18 commissioners had to agree to a recommendation before it was sent to Congress for a vote.[3] In a vote in December 2010, the commission fell short of that requirement, with only 11 out of the 18 commissioners (five Republicans, five Democrats, and one independent) voting to endorse the commission's blueprint.


On March 28, 2012, Representatives Jim Cooper (D-TN) and Steve LaTourette (R-OH) put a bill modeled on the plan, with, according to analyst Ezra Klein, "somewhat less in tax increases," to a vote in the House where it was rejected 382 to 38. 22 Democrats and 16 Republicans supported the bill.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-07-2021, 04:40 PM   #47
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

Still unable to comprehend the meaning of HR-1.
Still has not even tried to read 'it'!
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 12:16 AM   #48
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Ok....let's get this straight. I think you are a charlatan. A three card Monty. You take thing out of context and try and persuade folks who haven't studied an issue with your out of context/distorted numbers.
Very good, wtf! That's TWO big words you've impressed me with! "Realpolitik" and "charlatan"! Keep it up! Online dictionaries are jolly good fun, aren't they?

Try to be careful as you show off your expanding vocabulary. It's easy to mis-use those big new words "out of context".


Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
How about wr (sic) compare Obama's last two years with Trumps (sic) first two and Obama's first two with Trumps (sic) last two.

That is wtf dishonest people would do.
Wait! I've got a better idea!

Why don't we just cherry-pick and compare obama's BEST year with trump's WORST year? Would that be viewing their records in the proper "context"?

Or is that something only a "charlatan" would do?
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 12:27 AM   #49
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
lustylad... have you updated your graph?
Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Have any of you read lustylad's graph

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
lustylad can you tell us what the actual debt to GDP came in at very (sic) your projected number on your graph?

$20.93 trillion divided into 3.1 Trillion in case you don't know the numbers.

A tad over 15% in case you do not know how to divide.

Once again, the debt and the deficit are two different things.

Assuming you mean the deficit and not the debt, did you even bother to read my Opening Post?

You look pretty stupid asking a question 3 times that was already answered SMACK DAB in the third paragraph of the WSJ analysis in the OP!

Do you have a point? Will you be asking the same fucking question a fourth time later in this thread?

Have you considered taking cognitive tests with Biden?


Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
The Pandemic Spending Hangover

Federal debt has reached 100% of GDP even before Biden’s plans become law.



CBO says federal spending reached $6.55 trillion in fiscal 2020, as Congress addressed the damage from Covid-19 and the government shutdowns. That’s about a $2.1 trillion increase in a single year, and understandably so given the uncertainty of the threat as it emerged in the spring. Notably, and in a pleasant surprise, revenue fell a mere 1.2% to $3.42 trillion as the economy held up better than expected. The deficit came in at a staggering $3.13 trillion, or a record 14.9% of GDP.
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 01:03 AM   #50
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bf0082 View Post
lustylad, lol... cut spending.

Lets not increase our revenue, lets cut spending... um, the orange cheeto increased military spending by 100 Billion....

cut spending ?

why on earth did we cut coporate (sic) taxes...
Are you incapable of learning? Or unable to understand bar chart comparisons? I already schooled you on why we needed to lower the US corporate tax rate here:

https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...9&postcount=81

Don't you think it might be smart to familiarize yourself with the numbers involved before you stupidly conclude that trump's tax cut was the driver of all our federal budget woes??

The CBO estimated the 2017 tax cut would lower federal revenues by $1.5 trillion over ten years. That's $150 billion a year. In other words, chump change.

At the same time, federal spending in fiscal 2020 (which ended last September 30) alone went from $4.4 trillion to $6.55 trillion! In other words, spending soared by more than 14 times the amount of the tax cuts you keep crying and whining about!

Anyone with even a fleeting grasp of the federal budget numbers knows Uncle Sam has an out-of-control spending problem. To deny the obvious and quibble instead about the revenue side of the equation is like saying the Titantic can be saved if we just rearrange a few deck chairs!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 07:47 AM   #51
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

DPST's are incapable of comprehending anything not fed them by Xinn and their marxist idiotology.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 07:57 AM   #52
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post




Wait! I've got a better idea!

Why don't we just cherry-pick and compare obama's BEST year with trump's WORST year? Would that be viewing their records in the proper "context"?

Or is that something only a "charlatan" would do?
No actually I asked yo to compare Obama's worst two year vs Trumps worst two years.

And I asked you to compare Obama's two good years(though not his best two with Trumps BEST two years.

You can lie and distort all you want Pinocchio.



.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 08:03 AM   #53
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Are you incapable of learning? Or unable to understand bar chart comparisons? I already schooled you on why we needed to lower the US corporate tax rate here:

https://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p...9&postcount=81

Don't you think it might be smart to familiarize yourself with the numbers involved before you stupidly conclude that trump's tax cut was the driver of all our federal budget woes??

The CBO estimated the 2017 tax cut would lower federal revenues by $1.5 trillion over ten years. That's $150 billion a year. In other words, chump change.

At the same time, federal spending in fiscal 2020 (which ended last September 30) alone went from $4.4 trillion to $6.55 trillion! In other words, spending soared by more than 14 times the amount of the tax cuts you keep crying and whining about!

Anyone with even a fleeting grasp of the federal budget numbers knows Uncle Sam has an out-of-control spending problem. To deny the obvious and quibble instead about the revenue side of the equation is like saying the Titantic can be saved if we just rearrange a few deck chairs!
Anyone with half a brain and not a compulsive liar would know that I understand the problem. They would not lie about the tax commission Obama assembled and if one was to go back in time would see that I've been a huge proponent of spending cuts to the 3 largest programs. SS, Medicare and Defense.

Are there any more lies you want to throw out juniir?
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 08:10 AM   #54
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Once again, the debt and the deficit are two different things.

?
Really...good to know since I asked and answered you bullshit distortion.

You posted a graph which did not show that instead of 5% of deficit to GDP which in itself is terrible....Trump's was well over 15%.

Now go cheer on the Capital rioters and when they get arrested pretend that you are on the side of law and order....much like you did when you cheered folks who were promoting that SS was actually a progressive tax. Then switching sides once exposed.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 02:23 PM   #55
lustylad
BANNED
 
lustylad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 8, 2010
Location: Steeler Nation
Posts: 19,207
Encounters: 10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Now go cheer... like you did when you cheered folks who were promoting that SS was actually a progressive tax.
The lying liar lies again. You keep making shit up and lying - even after you've been challenged to prove your lies and you failed miserably!

You're worse than Harry Reid. Put up or shut up, you lying pussy!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
Social Security taxes? I defy you to find any quote I made calling SS taxes "progressive". Of course, you're a lying liar so we know you can't!
lustylad is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 03:01 PM   #56
oeb11
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 31, 2009
Location: dallas
Posts: 23,345
Default

'w' - is much like 'lm' - the tiny tyrants post nonsensen to 'bait' and stir up controversy - then cut and run

They have nothing cogent or constructive to offer.
typical DPST/ccp marxist tyrants and control freaks .


do get some professional help - it is a shame to live a life controlled by the LSM media as a minion with no independent thought.
oeb11 is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 05:07 PM   #57
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lustylad View Post
The lying liar lies again. You keep making shit up and lying - even after you've been challenged to prove your lies and you failed miserably!

You're worse than Harry Reid. Put up or shut up, you lying pussy!
Harry Ried?

Wtf dude....whats next Bob Dole and Newt Gingrich references?
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 05:09 PM   #58
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11 View Post
'w' - is much like 'lm' - the tiny tyrants post nonsensen to 'bait' and stir up controversy - then cut and run

They have nothing cogent or constructive to offer.
typical DPST/ccp marxist tyrants and control freaks .


do get some professional help - it is a shame to live a life controlled by the LSM media as a minion with no independent thought.
Can you post without DPST, CCP, marxists in a sentence?

You remind me of Rudy before Biden bitched slapped him with this line...


Rudy Giuliani - there's only three things he [needs] to make ... a sentence: a noun and a verb and 9/11.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 06:06 PM   #59
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 23,862
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Can you post without DPST, CCP, marxists in a sentence?

You remind me of Rudy before Biden bitched slapped him with this line...


Rudy Giuliani - there's only three things he [needs] to make ... a sentence: a noun and a verb and 9/11.
Yeah... You and biden making fun of 9/11! Great company!

DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 03-08-2021, 07:59 PM   #60
pfunkdenver
Valued Poster
 
pfunkdenver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 13, 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,853
Encounters: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie View Post
DISGUSTING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!
I know you are, but what am I? LOL!
pfunkdenver is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved