Queen Godess

[Dr-epg]

I think if you refer to the comments made in post #33 & #41 you will see the answer.

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

how about twitter ????

is that ok as long as only tits show and the harlot ops Ahem lady keep kitty n porn in her "only fans" area

Originally Posted by Dr-epg

I think if you refer to the comments made in post #33 & #41 you will see the answer.

itwitter ok then ???? Or am I reading that wrong

[Dr-epg]

Sir
That is not what was said.

If your confident the url has zero nudity and does not qualify as a ADD then go for it.

Don’t complain if there is a problem and your issued a 7 day ban

CK explained this very clearly in post # 35

[woodywouldpekher]

Some of the comments in this thread makes it easy to see how trump has, so far, suckered 207 million $ out of his "followers".

[offshoredrilling]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

And you are fully aware that is not is being said. Don't post links. Deal with it or not. Your choice.

Originally Posted by Dr-epg

Sir
That is not what was said.

If your confident the url has zero nudity and does not qualify as a ADD then go for it.

Don’t complain if there is a problem and your issued a 7 day ban

CK explained this very clearly in post #35

FIFY making the #35 a link worth 7 days per #35, True ????

askin as just trying to nail down what is and not ok

[bf0082]

Originally Posted by Dr-epg

Posting URL’s to a providers website is considered an Ad and they are not allowed
Having to go “off site to see it” makes zero difference.
URL’s containing any of the following are considered to be an ad
• availability/dates/location
• services
• rates/fees/specials
• Seeking an Appointment
• Asking Hobbyists to contact you



The Dr

So if we follow this outline as to what is unacceptable, we can look forward to the encounters thread getting closed, those are the exact fields required to make a post. Aren't Encounters just advertisements for Sex Workers ? worded as an experience.

[CryptKicker]

Links in reviews are fine as long as it does not lead to pornographic content. Links in the review thread are generally not allowed unless it goes to her website, ECCIE profile, P411, etc. Links in coed are okay as long as there is no nudity or porn on the page that comes up when you click it. Members have never been allowed to advertise for non-members so that's self-explanatory. Links in the men's lounge are slightly more lenient but absolutely no porn.

[Guest072323]

Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Links in reviews are fine as long as it does not lead to pornographic content. Links in the review thread are generally not allowed unless it goes to her website, ECCIE profile, P411, etc. Links in coed are okay as long as there is no nudity or porn on the page that comes up when you click it. Members have never been allowed to advertise for non-members so that's self-explanatory. Links in the men's lounge are slightly more lenient but absolutely no porn.

Which guideline # is this??
I still can't find it, but I'm sure it's there because I was told the guidelines are NOT in separate locations....

[gman44]

Originally Posted by Paulie Rockstar

Which guideline # is this??
I still can't find it, but I'm sure it's there because I was told the guidelines are NOT in separate locations....

https://www.eccie.net/announcement.php?f=5


as you can see there are 7 posts and #5 are the forum guidelines


if there are any new guidelines on this site they will be posted there.


there are also a sticky posted for some of whats posted at the top of the most of the forums.

[Guest072323]

Originally Posted by gman44

https://www.eccie.net/announcement.php?f=5


as you can see there are 7 posts and #5 are the forum guidelines


if there are any new guidelines on this site they will be posted there.


there are also a sticky posted for some of whats posted at the top of the most of the forums.

Interestingly.... THIS:

Recent events in the forum have necessitated requiring compliance with the guidance posted below.

Gentlemen these are the rules related to URL’s, Links to pictures, Ads or Porn

As a result of the changes made to Eccie in September 2019, advertising is no longer permitted on Eccie.

Posting URL’s to a providers website is considered an Ad and they are not allowed
Having to go “off site to see it” makes zero difference.
URL’s containing any of the following are considered to be an ad
• availability/dates/location
• services
• rates/fees/specials
• Seeking an Appointment
• Asking Hobbyists to contact you

While these URL’s are considered ads there is also the issue of the pictures not meeting ECCIE image standards (which I posted earlier) so they are in violation.


Links to Porn are not allowed anywhere on ECCIE and are handled swiftly. Links to Ads or Image Violations will also be handled with the same swiftness.

The Dr

did not make the cut......

[Gotyour6]

They make up shit as they go

Like cops you have to

[Guest102521]

Well , so much for this site being of any use!!!
R.I.P , just like E.com

[elghund]

Originally Posted by woodywouldpekher

Some of the comments in this thread makes it easy to see how trump has, so far, suckered 207 million $ out of his "followers".

Everyone all bent about no links allowed are also the ones who voted in the right wing whack jobs who passed the laws making link sharing a crime, to satisfy the religious idiots who make up a good portion of the Trump dumb fuck patrol.....

elg........

[Charno3]

Originally Posted by elghund

...the right wing whack jobs who passed the laws making link sharing a crime.....

Senate passed 97-2 (1 R, 1D against)
House passed 388-25 (94% of R's for, 94% of D's for)
It doesn't get much more bipartisan than that.

[CryptKicker]

This is not meant to be a political discussion so we are done here.