TWITLER FIRES TILLERSON

[bambino]

Originally Posted by lustylad

There are many ways to call someone a moron, missed dick.

Robert Gates, in “Duty,” published in January 2014, wrote... Mr. Obama “doesn’t trust” the military and “doesn’t believe in his own strategy."

Leon Panetta, in his 2014 memoir, “Worthy Fights,” said Mr. Obama “avoids the battle, complains, and misses opportunities.”

Oh fuck, Mystakes a misfit. He doesn’t comprehend such things.

[The_Waco_Kid]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Actually, according to Tillerson— who you idiots praised from jump — Twitler is a FUCKING MORON.

who is this Rex fellow? who was he other than a fellow corporate billionaire until His Regal Majesty The Lord Emperor Donald, Supreme Ruler of the Multi-Uverse snatched him up from obscenity .. ahhh i mean obscurity!!!

bahayhaaa

[bambino]

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

who is this Rex fellow? who was he other than a fellow corporate billionaire until His Regal Majesty The Lord Emperor Donald, Supreme Ruler of the Multi-Uverse snatched him up from obscenity .. ahhh i mean obscurity!!!

bahayhaaa

Mr Big Dick Daddy CEO was almost crying today at his presser. He Got Fired!!!! Go home Rex. It was nice knowin you.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Trust The Trump(TTT)!

https://theconservativetreehouse.com...e/#more-146852

Rex Tillerson Removed as Secretary of State…

Posted on March 13, 2018 by sundance

Secretary of State Rex Tillerson did an excellent job representing the professional and deliberate diplomatic approach of the U.S. and President Trump administration. His personal view toward foreign service on behalf of the U.S. was exemplary, and deserves high praise.

Having said that, as President Trump stated earlier today, there was also more than a tinge of disunity between the advocated views of Tillerson and the views of the Commander in Chief toward economic national security. At times the fractures between policy perspectives were visible. Over time those differences became more obvious.

As Secretary of the DoS Rex Tillerson supported the Paris Climate Treaty; the President did not; Secretary Tillerson supported the Obama administration’s Iran deal; the President did not; Tillerson was more apologetic toward lax immigration policy; the President is not; and there were other visible departures visible surrounding the use of economic leverage to achieve national security advancements, specifically on the issue of China and North Korea policy.


The primary perspective, drawing the greatest contrast, surrounded President Trump’s view and expressed policy of emphasizing strength; particularly economic strength – to gain national security objectives.

After many years of projected weakness by the former administration one of the key tenets of the Trump presidency has been reestablishing national security by focusing on unapologetic U.S. economic power regardless of global opinion therein.

Unapologetic economic power is where the views of President Trump and Secretary Tillerson parted. T-Rex projected more of a humble and altruistic approach; almost seeming embarrassed at times to participate in discussions of economic conflict and confrontation. Indeed it often seemed awkward for Mr. Tillerson as he carries a less confrontational and more servant-minded constitution.

While he is not a pure ‘globalist’ per se’, Secretary Tillerson was less deliberate toward achieving territorial economic goals as a method to achieve geopolitical national security. On matters surrounding these issues, T-Rex was more Wall Street than Main Street; more traditionally republican than change-agent populist.

Despite the media’s inability to see the severity of perspective, President Trump is not going to be swayed on matters of national economics. POTUS Trump will listen to alternate opinions based on current events, but his forward advancement toward U.S. economic security will not be slowed by high-minded analysis leading to paralysis. Within his outlook, always in the back of his mind, the clock is ticking… there’s an inherent sense of urgency.

Forcing economic change to enhance the territorial economic security of middle-America requires the ability of the change-agent to ignore the feelings and sensibilities of outside nations who will be confronted in the process. Diplomacy must be set aside when entering the predatory world of massive trillion dollar economic deals. There is no room for friends and comfort here, after thirty years of inept acquiescence, from President Trump’s perspective, winning is the only acceptable outcome.

Stopping the exfiltration of American wealth demands severity: “we either have a country or we don’t.” Within that dynamic the value of diplomacy is necessarily lessened in favor of more deliberate and unapologetic policy advancement. Inside that dynamic President Trump and Secretary Tillerson did not agree – and that is a major point of disunity.

As Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross has stated several times: “economic security is national security.” President Trump fundamentally believes that our national security requires independent U.S. economic security. Everything is downstream from the economics of the issue, any issue, regardless of the issue – foreign or domestic.

Carrying a sense of urgency toward these national security issues, delicate sensibilities -and the opinion of the media who protect them- are necessarily dispatched like a feather in a hurricane. Again, “we have no choice”, as often heard from President Trump.

Going into year #2 of the administration the current emphasis is a structural reset in the U.S. approach toward global trade. “Killers” are of value now; thirty years of talking and losing is over. As such inside this seismic trade-policy-shift, a parallel geopolitical strategy is being played out from the Middle-East through allies in Europe and into Asia around the rarely moved cornerstones of economics and trade.

National liberty, that is actual liberty – not the perception of liberty, is directly tied to economic victory. During this reset there are only two groups: predators and prey.

Confronting China (Xi Jinping) economically was/is what brought North Korea (Kim Jong-Un) to the table of discussion to give up their nuclear ambitions; it was not diplomacy that created the breakthrough conditions for a national security win. What brought China/DPRK to this position was the very real possibility of looming economic defeat. President Trump’s approach won, Secretary Tillerson was surprised.

President Trump has aligned his economic opponents into his preferred geography. Everyone within sight is either an adversary or an ally. However, allies are now reduced to being benefactors who will smartly get out of the way while the apex predators destroy their opposition. Year two is about resolving to achieve economic victory regardless of international collateral damage. There is no longer any room for negotiating terms. Diplomats retreat to the hilltops. The era of economic Titans has come again.

Final point – When approaching specific goals and objectives President Trump works through a strategy based on phases. President Trump doesn’t retain people past their expended usefulness. Rex Tillerson did an outstanding job as Secretary of State introducing the Trump administration to nations’ of the world.

The diplomatic introductions and niceties are now complete; it’s time to get down to business.

[themystic]

Originally Posted by lustylad

There are many ways to call someone a moron, missed dick.

Robert Gates, in “Duty,” published in January 2014, wrote... Mr. Obama “doesn’t trust” the military and “doesn’t believe in his own strategy."

Leon Panetta, in his 2014 memoir, “Worthy Fights,” said Mr. Obama “avoids the battle, complains, and misses opportunities.”

You're so witty and smart Mr LustyLoser. And very well read. Let me try this again.

Lusty, you are a MORON and a DBAG

[themystic]

Originally Posted by bambino

Mr Big Dick Daddy CEO was almost crying today at his presser. He Got Fired!!!! Go home Rex. It was nice knowin you.

I thought TrumPutin was hiring the smartest guys in the room. So why all this turnover stupid?

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by LexusLover

Exxon needs his undivided attention.

not possible.

exxon mobil has a mandatory retirement age of 65.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by Chateau Becot

Oh, no....its as Nancy predicted...."it's Armageddon".

Quickly, everyone......to the bunkers!!! lol

Independence Day the movie. they did a sequel too.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by WTF

Maybe that is why more captured white people wanted to stay with their captors and adhere to the Indian culture than Indians captured by whites wanted to stay in so called civilization. They all wanted to go back to their culture, not so with the whites.
.

that is a stupid thing to say.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

.Colonel Crawford’s Torture & Execution

The Delaware captured Colonel Crawford and Dr. Knight in June of 1782. The Delaware warriors stripped their captives naked and herded them back to camp where they marked Crawford for death by painting his face black and tying him to a stake surrounded by kindling and hickory poles radiating in a circle about six or seven yards out from the stake. Crawford spent the night tied to the stake with full knowledge that he would be tortured the next day.

how is this relevant to this thread?

at least the indians of yesteryear knew how to torture people properly with a modern twist.

the torture method of using the gunpowder without the shot is an interesting twist. they must've figured this out by trial and error.

those indians are real pros when it comes to torture, not those mexican cartel with the video murder of sheriff & his son in another thread.

[dilbert firestorm]

Originally Posted by themystic

that's an ender IB. Please close the tread

why?

[IIFFOFRDB]

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

how is this relevant to this thread?

The constant portrayal of Native Americans as benevolent, pastoral conservationist gets old. There was barbarous cruelty on both sides.

[Yssup Rider]

You’d know it, IBMassa!

The scourge of all off-white people in American history.

The Equivocations are endless In this one.,.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You’d know it, IBMassa!

The scourge of all off-white people in American history.

The Equivocations are endless In this one.,.

Your stupidity runs deeper than the cesspool you were born in, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

[TheDaliLama]

Originally Posted by themystic

How many of them publicly called BO a moron. That would be none

Non. And neither did Tillerson dumb fuck.