My apologies to COG and the conspiracy folks

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Not even. He's been schooled and then expelled for repetition. Since he's mine to give, you take his nasty assed self.

munkin... you got some splaining to do... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmuEMgz9kbc

Published on Oct 16, 2015

Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg Ebook PDF
Click http://bitly.com/1Oz6kK6

Author: Jonah Goldberg
Publish: 2008-01-08

“Fascists,” “Brownshirts,” “jackbooted stormtroopers”—such are the insults typically hurled at conservatives by their liberal opponents. Calling someone a fascist is the fastest way to shut them up, defining their views as beyond the political pale. But who are the real fascists in our midst? Liberal Fascism offers a startling new perspective on the theories and practices that define fascist politics. Replacing conveniently manufactured myths with surprising and enlightening research, Jonah Goldberg reminds us that the original fascists were really on the left, and that liberals from Woodrow Wilson to FDR to Hillary Clinton have advocated policies and principles remarkably similar to those of Hitler's National Socialism and Mussolini's Fascism. Contrary to what most people think, the Nazis were ardent socialists (hence the term “National socialism”). They believed in free health care and guaranteed jobs. They confiscated inherited wealth and spent vast sums on public education. They purged the church from public policy, promoted a new form of pagan spirituality, and inserted the authority of the state into every nook and cranny of daily life. The Nazis declared war on smoking, supported abortion, euthanasia, and gun control. They loathed the free market, provided generous pensions for the elderly, and maintained a strict racial quota system in their universities—where campus speech codes were all the rage. The Nazis led the world in organic farming and alternative medicine. Hitler was a strict vegetarian, and Himmler was an animal rights activist. Do these striking parallels mean that today’s liberals are genocidal maniacs, intent on conquering the world and imposing a new racial order? Not at all. Yet it is hard to deny that modern progressivism and classical fascism shared the same intellectual roots. We often forget, for example, that Mussolini and Hitler had many admirers in the United States. W.E.B. Du Bois was inspired by Hitler's Germany, and Irving Berlin praised Mussolini in song. Many fascist tenets were espoused by American progressives like John Dewey and Woodrow Wilson, and FDR incorporated fascist policies in the New Deal. Fascism was an international movement that appeared in different forms in different countries, depending on the vagaries of national culture and temperament. In Germany, fascism appeared as genocidal racist nationalism. In America, it took a “friendlier,” more liberal form. The modern heirs of this “friendly fascist” tradition include the New York Times, the Democratic Party, the Ivy League professoriate, and the liberals of Hollywood. The quintessential Liberal Fascist isn't an SS storm trooper; it is a female grade school teacher with an education degree from Brown or Swarthmore. These assertions may sound strange to modern ears, but that is because we have forgotten what fascism is. In this angry, funny, smart, contentious book, Jonah Goldberg turns our preconceptions inside out and shows us the true meaning of Liberal Fascism.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Bullshit. You were the very first, IBidiot. The ORIGINAL Dipshit of the Year. The very block of fecal matter upon which this esteemed and historic tradition was built. Let's face it: Without YOU there would be no Dipshit of the Year on ECCIE.

In other words, IBIdiot, you were the original DOTY. But don't feel bad. You'll ALWAYS be Number Two to me.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA!

Keep lying like the sack of shit you are, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

[Yssup Rider]

Yeah yeah. But who was the FIRST Declared Dipshit of the Year?

We ALL know it was you, Dipshit.

You whined, cried, pissed and moaned so long and hard about it that when the first poll was conducted, you left in a late model HUFF. How long was it, IBIdiot? Six weeks I think.

Then you doctored the results of a bogus poll and refused to acknowledge the facts.

That's history, IBIdiot. You were the first and remain the biggest!

I hear that HUFF pulling up to the front gate of the coal mine. Time to go, DOTY!

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yeah yeah. But who was the FIRST Declared Dipshit of the Year?

We ALL know it was you, Dipshit.

You whined, cried, pissed and moaned so long and hard about it that when the first poll was conducted, you left in a late model HUFF. How long was it, IBIdiot? Six weeks I think.

Then you doctored the results of a bogus poll and refused to acknowledge the facts.

That's history, IBIdiot. You were the first and remain the biggest!

I hear that HUFF pulling up to the front gate of the coal mine. Time to go, DOTY!

Without the freelance faggot from Arkansas for competition, you're destined to win it again, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yeah yeah. But who was the FIRST Declared Dipshit of the Year?

We ALL know it was you, Dipshit.

You whined, cried, pissed and moaned so long and hard about it that when the first poll was conducted, you left in a late model HUFF. How long was it, IBIdiot? Six weeks I think.

Then you doctored the results of a bogus poll and refused to acknowledge the facts.

That's history, IBIdiot. You were the first and remain the biggest!

I hear that HUFF pulling up to the front gate of the coal mine. Time to go, DOTY!

Just do a simple "Google" search, Urinal Lips the SCAT AFICIONADO...


http://m.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=946023&page=8









.

[DSK]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Keep lying like the sack of shit you are, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

You can't read a map or a poll, can you?

[CuteOldGuy]

AssupLiar, now you know that first "declaration" of yours was not a poll. It was your opinion. When put to a vote, you have won more elections for DOTY than anyone. The last one left, which mean that you, as first runner up, will carry the title into 2017. Long may you reign! No one deserves it more.

[Rey Lengua]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

AssupLiar, now you know that first "declaration" of yours was not a poll. It was your opinion. When put to a vote, you have won more elections for DOTY than anyone. The last one left, which mean that you, as first runner up, will carry the title into 2017. Long may you reign! No one deserves it more.

We filled the 2016 DOTY ( NOT 206 !! ) seat that was absented by the landslide winner, woomby, with a new poll / election that had Lil Cotex running away with the title and the second highest vote getter, assup, being named his " Vice-DOTY " !! And Lil Cotex even won HIS OWN rigged polls ( rigged for other's to win ! ) to make him ECCIE'S "Triple CROWN " WINNER ! Guess we shall have to start using " call to post ", like they do at horse race tracks, as the theme song for any poll that has Lil Cotex in it !!!

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by lustylad

Just one wee, wee widdle pwobwem wid your sophisticated conspiracy theory, masterdickmuncher.... if LBJ shoulda, coulda, woulda negotiated a Vietnam peace settlement in October 1968 BUT FOR the subversive machinations of Tricky Dick, then why did it take FIVE FUCKING YEARS for Nixon to git 'er done once he took office?
It's obvious you didn't read the articles. You not understanding something isn't the standard for everyone else.



The North Vietnamese were notoriously intransigent negotiators. They knew how to pocket temporary bombing halts in return for vague promises of future flexibility. They were never even remotely close to a peace accord in October 1968 and you know it.

I can't believe you take the time to type your primary language.

First off ludicrous lass, it's not my theory. I can hear your bitch voice screaming at reporters who report about something you don't like. Which you think you can refute with baby talk. Without a single fact.
You can't refute any of the facts with your stupid opinions so you double down on being a prick by getting mad at the messenger.

Bottom line is you don't even known who you're arguing with. 3 respected sources and you talk baby talk.

My theory is your priest got away with it when you were an alter boy.

Now for your butt boy.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

This story is really old news, and for CNN to characterize this as somehow being "new" is unmitigated BS. Erlichmann -- the friggin' purported source for this story -- died in 1999!!! And LBJ was a paranoid jackass who fantasized that there was a conspiracy and falsely accused Nixon of collaborating with the enemy, Masterdickmuncher. RE: your Reagan lies, Masterdickmuncher, per a dim-retard Congress' findings:

Wrong again asshole. I didn't say Reagan or any of his people collaborated with Iran.....over return of the embassy hostages. They certainly did later with the arms deal. I said the Iranians waited for a better deal
So once again you've lied about someone lying. One of your more major habits.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It's obvious you didn't read the articles. You not understanding something isn't the standard for everyone else.

I can't believe you take the time to type your primary language.

First off ludicrous lass, it's not my theory. I can hear your bitch voice screaming at reporters who report about something you don't like. Which you think you can refute with baby talk. Without a single fact.
You can't refute any of the facts with your stupid opinions so you double down on being a prick by getting mad at the messenger.

Bottom line is you don't even known who you're arguing with. 3 respected sources and you talk baby talk.

My theory is your priest got away with it when you were an alter boy.

Now for your butt boy.

Every one of your *3 respected sources* jump to unsubstantiated conclusions based on circumstantial evidence, Masterdickmuncher. The notes from this White House meeting makes it pretty damn clear that S Vietnam wasn't even considered an obstacle in the peace talks. N Vietnam was the obstinate party, Masterdickmuncher.

FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES 1964–1968
VOLUME VI, VIETNAM, JANUARY–AUGUST 1968, DOCUMENT 265

265. Notes of Meeting

Washington, June 9, 1968, 2:30 p.m.

Ambassador at Large William Averell Harriman strongly believed that the war could not end without Soviet help. In his words, “Keep the dialogue going with Kosygin. That will end this war. Our dialogue with North Vietnam won’t”.

Secretary of Defense Clark Clifford: “All of us want to bring the war to a conclusion… We won't end the war by negotiations with the North Vietnamese. They control the level of the war. They can go on indefinitely from the manpower aspect. Soviets and Red China continue to supply them with all they need. The combat in South Vietnam has not forced them to end this war. Bombing in South or North won't stop war. What will stop it is an arrangement with the Soviets so they can use their leverage—which we don't have—to bring the Soviets to force Hanoi to stop it. The cost of the war for the Soviets is becoming heavier. The Kosygin letter has the same tone as the hot line message he made to us at the time of the Middle East crisis.” https://history.state.gov/historical...964-68v06/d265

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Wrong again asshole. I didn't say Reagan or any of his people collaborated with Iran.....over return of the embassy hostages. They certainly did later with the arms deal. I said the Iranians waited for a better deal

So once again you've lied about someone lying. One of your more major habits.

You'd be the one lying, Masterdickmuncher. Mark Bowden, in his book, Guests of the Aytollah, states that the Iranians didn't release the hostages until Reagan was sworn into office just so they could stick their thumb in Carter's eye one last time.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

There's at least a pair of Nguyens who dispute Masterdickmuncher, et al's spin and at least three DOTY polls that repudiate your lie, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

And they have no reason to lie, do they?

I love this. "My spin".

Fuck off.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

And they have no reason to lie, do they?

I love this. "My spin".

Fuck off.

That's right, Masterdickmuncher, they have absolutely no reason to lie; whereas, Dims wax vitriolic at the mere mention of the name "Nixon", or, for that matter, "Reagan".

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by DSK

That reasoning completely shoots down Munchmidget - but he will no doubt get on here, claim victory, call someone a D-Bag, and think his stupid bullshit will hide the fact that you completely humiliated him.

You call that reasoning?
Those few lines of his opinion vs. hundreds of lines containing facts documented in multiple ways and reported by credible journalists humiliated me? But not George Will and his stupid bullshit??

The only thing you almost got right was the victory thing.

Because there's no reason to state the obvious.

Like the fact that there is only one humiliated person here. And it's not me or your butt buddy.
Just you jl. Twice.
Because you don't see the obvious.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That's right, Masterdickmuncher, they have absolutely no reason to lie; whereas, dims wax vitriolic at the mere mention of the name "Nixon", or, for that matter, "Reagan".

Whatever you say. Your opinion has no value due to the nature of your regard for Nixon. You hate Clinton because he got a blowjob but see no problem with Nixon. Nothing vitriolic about it. Plain and simple. Nixon was a criminal who needed a pardon from his successor.