Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70817
biomed163484
Yssup Rider61124
gman4453308
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48753
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42983
The_Waco_Kid37293
CryptKicker37225
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2020, 02:42 PM   #46
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post

Nothing else you posted is any way shape or form reduces her culpability.

Comeys Statement on the investgation:


So you are wrong again... those who it was sent to are also on the hook to protect the classified info and report it. None did.

She wasn't charged because she's a former FLOTUS, Sec of State, and a Dem Presidential nominee. one set of rules for you and one for them.

Again Comey:

But one set of laws for them and one for us.
It was not a different set of rules. In Comey's statement he was talking about 18 USC 1924. Comey "very few of the classified emails bore markings indicating they were classified" So what is in the header "DOES MAKE A DIFFERENCE"

18 USC 1924 does not call for "jail time" if you should have known you received and email that was classified but you didn't know and didn't protect it. At best you lose your security clearance to view classified information or pay a fine. HRC was not SOS anymore when Comey gave his report to Congress. If HRC was a republican you would not be calling for jail time.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 10-13-2020, 02:57 PM   #47
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HedonistForever View Post
And I for one would have settled for that but no charge?
Rules 18 USC 1924 and 18 USC 793 are in post #21.

HRC had a minor violation of 18 USC 1924. She received some emails that had a "C" for in front of the sentence. Which means that sentence was classified. The email itself was not marked classified in the header by the sender. This is what Comey told Congress. "For not knowing that you had classified information and failing to protect it" you lose your access to classified information and/or pay a fine. HRC had already left the state department and did not have access to classified information at the time Comey gave his report. Thus, no charge. Republican's wanted her to get jail time for a minor violation of 18 USC 1924.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 01:16 AM   #48
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

depends on the definition of minor.


you know Comey perjured in front of congress. so what makes you think he was telling the truth or lying his ass off to protect Hillary.
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 04:11 AM   #49
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm View Post
depends on the definition of minor.
Out of 150,000 plus emails, none were marked classified in the header (and it does make a difference). There a couple of emails that had a single sentence or two out of a dozen paragraphs marked "C" for classified sentence. 18 USC 1924 does not call for jail time if you mishandled a couple emails that were not marked classified. You lose your access to view classified information and/or pay a fine.
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 07:38 AM   #50
1blackman1
Lifetime Premium Access
 
Join Date: Nov 16, 2013
Location: Baton Rouge
Posts: 6,109
Encounters: 41
Default

Ada, quit confusing the Idiot Crew with actual information. If they can’t get it fed to them by Rush Laura or Sean, they won’t understand it no matter how many statutes you quote. Fox Rush and OANN have already informed them what to think and deviating from that is outside their nature.
1blackman1 is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 08:45 AM   #51
rexdutchman
Valued Poster
 
rexdutchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1, 2013
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 12,555
Encounters: 22
Default

She bleach bit ed the important ones , so
rexdutchman is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 10:39 AM   #52
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,888
Encounters: 22
Default

killary deleted those emails! Everyone can clearly see that!

Well exceptin the dimretards

She also lied about benghazi!

lock her up
lock her up
lock her up
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 12:07 PM   #53
dilbert firestorm
Valued Poster
 
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 9, 2010
Location: Nuclear Wasteland BBS, New Orleans, LA, USA
Posts: 31,921
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Out of 150,000 plus emails, none were marked classified in the header (and it does make a difference). There a couple of emails that had a single sentence or two out of a dozen paragraphs marked "C" for classified sentence. 18 USC 1924 does not call for jail time if you mishandled a couple emails that were not marked classified. You lose your access to view classified information and/or pay a fine.
and using bleachbit is not?
dilbert firestorm is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 12:30 PM   #54
texassapper
Valued Poster
 
texassapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 19, 2017
Location: Dallas
Posts: 5,328
Encounters: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adav8s28 View Post
Out of 150,000 plus emails, none were marked classified in the header (and it does make a difference). There a couple of emails that had a single sentence or two out of a dozen paragraphs marked "C" for classified sentence. 18 USC 1924 does not call for jail time if you mishandled a couple emails that were not marked classified. You lose your access to view classified information and/or pay a fine.
According to the State Department, there were 2,093 email chains on the server that were retroactively marked as classified by the State Department as "Confidential," 65 as "Secret," and 22 as "Top Secret." Some of the documents were related to Keyhole which is NSA speak for satellite photography.

You keep trying to downplay how many of the documents were classified and intent.

Intent doesn't matter in this case. It's open and shut, she she committed a crime (with the obvious intent) and then tried to cover it up (bleachbit)

For that reason alone, I could never vote for that gash. And liberals...doesn't matter to liberals how much of a power hungry lunatic a person is (see karmela) they only thing that matters is Democrat power.... America can go fuck itslef.
texassapper is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 01:04 PM   #55
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Pompeo better hurry up....he is not going to be SoS much longer
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 01:08 PM   #56
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,888
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Pompeo better hurry up....he is not going to be SoS much longer
Did someone use bleahbit on the vip's brain?

winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 01:09 PM   #57
WTF
Lifetime Premium Access
 
WTF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 48,267
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winn dixie View Post
Did someone use bleahbit on the vip's brain?

I see you're back in stalker mode....I'm gonna have to report you to your momma.
WTF is offline   Quote
Old 10-14-2020, 01:11 PM   #58
winn dixie
Valued Poster
 
winn dixie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 5, 2017
Location: austin
Posts: 22,888
Encounters: 22
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
I see you're back in stalker mode....I'm gonna have to report you to your momma.


You can do better?
winn dixie is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2020, 12:10 AM   #59
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WTF View Post
Pompeo better hurry up....he is not going to be SoS much longer
Your're right. Biden needs to do two things to get to 270 electoral college votes. Win the same states HRC won and flip Mich, Penn and Wisconsin. Right now Biden is +7 in Mich, + 7 in Penn and +6.3 in Wisc, well beyond the margin for error. Trump/Pence are going home Jan 2021.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Old 10-15-2020, 12:26 AM   #60
adav8s28
Valued Poster
 
adav8s28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 4, 2011
Location: sacremento
Posts: 3,659
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by texassapper View Post
According to the State Department, there were 2,093 email chains on the server that were retroactively marked as classified by the State Department as "Confidential," 65 as "Secret," and 22 as "Top Secret." Some of the documents were related to Keyhole which is NSA speak for satellite photography.

You keep trying to downplay how many of the documents were classified and intent.
The word retroactively is key here. How can one knowingly mishandle documents that were NOT marked classified at THE TIME THEY WERE SENT? Again, you can't be charged with violation of 18 USC 1924 if you did not knowingly mishandle classified information. You (from your own post) admit that the information was retroactively marked classified. It's not that there is one set of rules for HRC and another for everyone else. You have your own interpretation of how 18 USC 1924 reads. HRC did not remove any classified information from the government server. The information was not marked classified in the header or as Comey put in very few markings with a "C" indicating classified information.

In Clinton's case at best you would lose your access to view classified information or pay a fine. You may not like it but 18 USC 1924 does not call for jail time for "not knowing" the document someone sent you contained classified information.

From the link below 18 USC 1924:

Whoever being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than one year, or both.

https://time.com/3977063/hillary-cli...ls-laws-rules/
adav8s28 is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved