this ThreAd serves a purpose. I need to ask the guys about gloryholes

[Jack$lit]

Wonder how this goes down in vacation time? Is it like multiple counts in the penalties , like multiple handles, hanging out in the mens locker room , posting fake reviews, are the infractions all weighted and the proper vacation then tallied up and the judge issues the sentence ?

[fun2come]

She'll be back .... New Handle, New (fake) pics ... some WK warrior to Verify her ... The Usual Suspects you know

Until BANNED again... it's like the monthly cycle, except more irregular ....

[SpiceItUp]

Originally Posted by RandB fan

Since it is fictional it should be allowed to be made common knowledge.

Hippo? What you think? Since it never happened should it be moved to Coed or alerts?


Think of the educational value: It may help other providers from making the same dumb ass mistakes.

Where else have we seen questionable reviews recently?

It is content that was created for male premium members and there's no precedent for changing that, so it stays private. Sorry lol.

Reviews that have been determined to be fraudulent are usually left in place but clearly marked as such at the top of them and then removed from both the reviewer's profile and the provider's profile. We go to great lengths to avoid removing any content from this site.

Originally Posted by Jack$lit

Wonder how this goes down in vacation time? Is it like multiple counts in the penalties , like multiple handles, hanging out in the mens locker room , posting fake reviews, are the infractions all weighted and the proper vacation then tallied up and the judge issues the sentence ?

That would be what we would call "stacking" penalties which is frowned upon except in extreme circumstances. Typically what is done is that if an incident should violate multiple guidelines that are ban worthy the "sentences" are "served" concurrently so the one with the longest length is served in full while the others are fulfilled simultaneously.

[nuglet]

I hate when the sentences are consecutively.. they can sure add up.What we have here gents, is a kind judge...

[Stewie griffen]

Me and my great friend Ms Muse will be hosting a gloryhole, come use our mouths. We don't miss a drop.

160/ gh
200/ fs gh

2222/620 area

Saw this in snatch thread..... Hg.. Ms muse.... Me thinks we have a new name....

[RandB fan]

Another ($#&@ing $#%#ipe) member who every time someone does something (that he thinks is a rule violation) wants to recite the rules. Haven't you ever read the book that is "must read" for successful managers?
The book appeared on the New York Times bestseller list for 93 weeks so I am sure it was a piece of shit.


Didn't you mommy ever tell you that tattling on other's will cause the other kids to not like you or include you in any activities, I remember a kid you remind me of, who finally got smart after repeated meetings with some of the guys he told on. Apparently we have bumped into each other again in adult life. You haven't changed a bit!!!

The above is totally fictitious as I have not, nor never would not consider causing bodily injury upon someone who is unable to defend themselves physically or intellectually. I would describe it differently but you were made enough fun of in elementary school.


I was going to play the "you're a cunt" song but found this video which I think even you can understand maybe we can have a thread sing along for our resident "tattletale"

Originally Posted by Mike Vronsky

#11 - Review "Quacking" , a term which describes openly proclaiming falsehood in reply to a review, will be strongly discouraged by our staff. If you believe a review to be false, use the RTM function to report it to your local staff.

[powermad]

Originally Posted by Stewie griffen

Me and my great friend Ms Muse will be hosting a gloryhole, come use our mouths. We don't miss a drop.

160/ gh
200/ fs gh

2222/620 area

Saw this in snatch thread..... Hg.. Ms muse.... Me thinks we have a new name....

A bunch of providers don't know how to follow the rules of that snatch thread.
The thing is littered with post containing rates even though it's not allowed.
Mods should drop the hammer on all them.
Maybe with Spice here he'll do what Houston did and get rid of the thing.

[RandB fan]

There's an APP for that!!!!!!

Originally Posted by fun2come

You asking me???

Let me Think .... that will take some time ... looking for the who to believe on the Eccie board dice ... must have misplaced them ... so .... it's a crap shoot ...

How about a Definite May Be

[SpiceItUp]

Originally Posted by powermad

A bunch of providers don't know how to follow the rules of that snatch thread.
The thing is littered with post containing rates even though it's not allowed.
Mods should drop the hammer on all them.
Maybe with Spice here he'll do what Houston did and get rid of the thing.

Point of order: The Austin SNATCH thread allows rates, you're thinking of the San Antonio one which does not.

Yes I'm aware it's confusing but rule sets for it ar determined on a city by city basis. I'm all in favor of less arbitrary restrictions rather than more so it's SA's problem not ours...if they'd like to bring theirs in line with Austin's then great!

Yes, sadly the Houston ladies could not follow even the simplest of rules and it became a bear to moderate. Truth be told though some of the blame lies at the feet of the mods at the time who kept changing the damned rules for no particular reason so it was confusing and became a clusterfuck.

There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when it got taken down but sometimes you just have to cut your losses! It won't be returning to Htown anytime soon let's just put it that way!

The ladies of Austin seem to, for the most part, stay with the program and people like it. So unless people start to lose their minds I'm thinking the experiment has succeeded here.

[powermad]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Point of order: The Austin SNATCH thread allows rates, you're thinking of the San Antonio one which does not.

Yes I'm aware it's confusing but rule sets for it ar determined on a city by city basis. I'm all in favor of less arbitrary restrictions rather than more so it's SA's problem not ours...if they'd like to bring theirs in line with Austin's then great!

Yes, sadly the Houston ladies could not follow even the simplest of rules and it became a bear to moderate. Truth be told though some of the blame lies at the feet of the mods at the time who kept changing the damned rules for no particular reason so it was confusing and became a clusterfuck.

There was much wailing and gnashing of teeth when it got taken down but sometimes you just have to cut your losses! It won't be returning to Htown anytime soon let's just put it that way!

The ladies of Austin seem to, for the most part, stay with the program and people like it. So unless people start to lose their minds I'm thinking the experiment has succeeded here.

I must be missing something or going blind maybe?
But I've read the rules of the thread as currently posted, and I see no such rule allowing rates to be posted.
It's actually quite specific to the 5 things that are allowed.

Originally Posted by ztonk

The information provided may not exceed the following items and it is expected to be written in the following format:

• For the ladies:
  • Time available:
  • Location (incall, outcall, or either):
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • URL links (2 max):

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1057538771&postcount=1


I've also read the old archived rules and no such allowance in them either.

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1195043

Shouldn't they be updated IF in fact it is allowed?

[SpiceItUp]

Hmm yeah I see that portion, which appears as if it is a direct copy of the one in SA. The SA one also has a portion which says:

No pictures, rates, services may be posted

The one in Austin only mentions pictures.

There was a recent mod discussion about it when I came on board so I do know for a fact that Rates and Services are not currently restricted in Austin SNATCH. I agree with you that it should be made more clear, I'll mention it to ztonk as the handles the thread updates.

Thanks for the heads up.

[VictoriaLyn]

Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Hmm yeah I see that portion, which appears as if it is a direct copy of the one in SA. The SA one also has a portion which says:



The one in Austin only mentions pictures.

There was a recent mod discussion about it when I came on board so I do know for a fact that Rates and Services are not currently restricted in Austin SNATCH. I agree with you that it should be made more clear, I'll mention it to ztonk as the handles the thread updates.

Thanks for the heads up.

I'm pretty sure that we're not allowed to post rates or servicesSpecially since right above the format it says


e information provided may not exceed the following items and it is expected to be written in the following format:

[TemptationTammie]

Originally Posted by ztonk

THE RULES:

• Must use standard size font, no colors, no special characters, no smilies. Note: Boldface, italics, and underline are ok.
• Single space only.
• No pictures.
• One post per calendar day (from 12:01am - Midnight)
• You must be readily available within three hours of posting.
• No discussions or commenting on other's ads.
• A lady must be a Verified Provider to post ads.

The information provided may not exceed the following items and it is expected to be written in the following format:

• For the ladies:
  • Time available:
  • Location (incall, outcall, or either):
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • URL links (2 max):

• For the gentlemen:
  • Time available:
  • Preferred method of meeting (incall or outcall):
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • Preferred activities (acronyms only):

I have to agree with VL, I take these rules as saying that rates and services are not allowed in lady's posts.

[ztonk]

I've clarified the rules in the SNATCH thread. The changes are highlighted below in blue:

THE RULES:

• Must use standard size font, no colors, no special characters, no smilies. Note: Boldface, italics, and underline are ok.
• Single space only (NO BLANK LINES)
• No pictures. (Rates and Services are ok.)
• One post per calendar day (from 12:01am - Midnight)
• You must be readily available within three hours of posting.
• No discussions or commenting on other's ads.
• A lady must be a Verified Provider to post ads.

The information provided may not exceed the following items and it is expected to be written in the following format:

• For the ladies:
  • Time available:
  • Location (incall, outcall, or either), rates, services:
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • URL links (2 max):

• For the gentlemen:
  • Time available:
  • Preferred method of meeting (incall or outcall):
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • Preferred activities (acronyms only):

These rules are subject to change and such changes will be noted in the thread.

These rules were last updated on: December 23, 2015

Link to old SNATCH thread... archived on 2015/12/05

[VictoriaLyn]

Originally Posted by ztonk

I've clarified the rules in the SNATCH thread. The changes are highlighted below in blue:

THE RULES:

• Must use standard size font, no colors, no special characters, no smilies. Note: Boldface, italics, and underline are ok.
• Single space only (NO BLANK LINES)
• No pictures. (Rates and Services are ok.)
• One post per calendar day (from 12:01am - Midnight)
• You must be readily available within three hours of posting.
• No discussions or commenting on other's ads.
• A lady must be a Verified Provider to post ads.

The information provided may not exceed the following items and it is expected to be written in the following format:

• For the ladies:
  • Time available:
  • Location (incall, outcall, or either), rates, services:
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • URL links (2 max):

• For the gentlemen:
  • Time available:
  • Preferred method of meeting (incall or outcall):
  • Preferred method of contact:
  • Contact information:
  • Preferred activities (acronyms only):

These rules are subject to change and such changes will be noted in the thread.

These rules were last updated on: December 23, 2015

Link to old SNATCH thread... archived on 2015/12/05

Thankyou Z....