Biden IMPEACHMENT Inquiry

[eyecu2]

Ok, the claim is Money Laundering and Bribery-

Did Joe do this laundry, or did his son, or is it his brother, or his sister in law, or is it anyone that has yet to be named???

And if so, how did Joe Benefit from laundering any money directly? Or did his son accept payments, and then pay taxes on them, and if so , or not, did he give money away?

I'm certain that giving money is NOT illegal if it's declared or has all taxes paid on it. AS you are 100 aware, Loans are not taxable as income, which is how filthy millionaires make their income as you know - example see ala Trump. He refi's his properties regularly and lines his pockets with that additional principal removals, and it's all legal schmegal.

Bribery-...well, AS far as any of the documents or the rest of the shenanigan's of assertion of crimes, I've not seen any shred of evidence that would amount to pro quo's on what Joe gave back in the form of a favor for pay. Where is that at? I'm not saying buried under a rock in Muncy Indiana isn't 'a locket that bears the name of the man that Brandy' loves', but it sure doesn't have any info on Joe's giving something from money, anymore than what the committee has supposedly found. If they had that, it would be broadcast far and wide---besides on FOX news or bitchute or megawhopper-GOP-delight. That- is pure malarkey!

[eyecu2]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... But I DO understand WHY they're Investigating him now.
With the Impeachment Inquiry.

Because it's words and actions... Joe's knowledge and involvement.
And there's plenty of BOTH!

Biden has repeatedly stated the same thing- he doesn't know about his son's overseas deals. full stop.

First-off, there's Joe Biden's CONSTANT lies and denials about this.
And then there's Hunter - and his ever-changing tales.

Hunter has made one public statement- when he came to congress- and that he would be glad to do a public meeting under-oath, so good luck with getting him to incriminate himself in a closed door hearing. Not gonna happen. The GOP should just take what they can get.



No wonder they're doing the Inquiry.

#### Salty

The Inquiry is to simply put Biden in question. Plain and simple. There is no intent in following up post Nov. 24th, and there never was. They want Joe to go away, and that's it. If Joe woke up today- and decided to not run for any reason....this whole sham would be gone like the darkness at dawn.

To be honest, I'm certain that Hunter used his pops name to make money- and that by itself isn't illegal. It's been done by a majority of presidents and nepotism in politics is the way things are done. Equally I don't think that they will ever be able directly tie Joe to any illegal monies, or activities. He's smart enough to have sheltered himself from that; because he doesn't have that kind of ego that needs to be directly in the discussions.

Hunter can go to jail if he did anything wrong, and likely he'll get a slap on the wrist at most. It's of nobody's interest to put ppl in jail if they can pay the fine instead. --Unless they can prove something more nefarious or criminal etc. such as a crimes against the state etc.

That shit requires to loss of freedom.

[tommy156]

Somebody wake me up when we have more than:

Numerous allegations with no evidence.

TIA

[Salty Again]

... Again - the Inquiry is just getting started, lads.

Haven't even heard from Hunter and Jim Biden yet.
And President Joe. ... And MORE whistleblowers.

... So, what-ever you do - where-ever you go --- Just wait!

#### Salty

[tommy156]

"Just wait"

Lol. We've been hearing that for years now. Still no evidence. We shouldn't have to "just wait" YEARS for evidence.

Then again, these are the same people still trying to overturn the 2020 election. Still no evidence of that either. Gluttons for punishment, I guess.

[onawbtngr546]

Originally Posted by Salty Again

... Again - the Inquiry is just getting started, lads.

Haven't even heard from Hunter and Jim Biden yet.
And President Joe. ... And MORE whistleblowers.

... So, what-ever you do - where-ever you go --- Just wait!

#### Salty

What are they supposed to say? Where are they supposed to say it? Who asked them to say?



You can't just swing around 'they won't testify' if they haven't even been asked to testify.

[Salty Again]

... So - Hunter has not-onley been "asked" - he's COMPELLED
to be there. ... Jim Biden also.

Are YOU claiming that they haven't been asked??

#### Salty

[Salty Again]

... Blimey! ... "Profiteering" and "Enriching While in Office"
are two Federal Charges. ... And Impeachable offences.

The year 2025 aint THAT far away, mates.

#### Salty

[tommy156]

Crikey! Still no evidence!

Lol. Nothing 🍔

[Yssup Rider]

Just wait ... famous first words.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by eyecu2

Ok, the claim is Money Laundering and Bribery-

Did Joe do this laundry, or did his son, or is it his brother, or his sister in law, or is it anyone that has yet to be named???

And if so, how did Joe Benefit from laundering any money directly? Or did his son accept payments, and then pay taxes on them, and if so , or not, did he give money away?

I'm certain that giving money is NOT illegal if it's declared or has all taxes paid on it. AS you are 100 aware, Loans are not taxable as income, which is how filthy millionaires make their income as you know - example see ala Trump. He refi's his properties regularly and lines his pockets with that additional principal removals, and it's all legal schmegal.

Bribery-...well, AS far as any of the documents or the rest of the shenanigan's of assertion of crimes, I've not seen any shred of evidence that would amount to pro quo's on what Joe gave back in the form of a favor for pay. Where is that at? I'm not saying buried under a rock in Muncy Indiana isn't 'a locket that bears the name of the man that Brandy' loves', but it sure doesn't have any info on Joe's giving something from money, anymore than what the committee has supposedly found. If they had that, it would be broadcast far and wide---besides on FOX news or bitchute or megawhopper-GOP-delight. That- is pure malarkey!

I stopped reading this horseshit after the first 3 paragraphs

1. Biden son is in trouble for not paying taxes on the money he received

2. Just because u say it's a loan, doesn't make it a loan in the eyes of the irs. You have to show a payback or proof showing a payback schedule or it has to be paid back. If not it is considered income.

You fucking guys are so blinded by ur political views, it is pathetic.

Here is an easy way to show which politicians are fucking us and are in the game for the money however they can get it.

What was their net worth when they came into power and what it is after.....

It's out there just take some time to research it. Then maybe your eyes will open alittle

FYI. Trump lost mo eyes after becoming president...alot

Biden has made huge amounts, ur messiah Obama made big bucks also
Polysilicon that can't raked it in. Not forgetting the rightness either. Alot of them did the same

Why would these guys spent hundreds of millio s of dollars to win an election for a job that based on salary could never pay them enough to recoup it?

Geez.......

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by chizzy

1. Biden son is in trouble for not paying taxes on the money he received

2. Just because u say it's a loan, doesn't make it a loan in the eyes of the irs. You have to show a payback or proof showing a payback schedule or it has to be paid back. If not it is considered income.

Ok, so get to the part where this becomes an impeachable offense for Joe Biden. After you get there, we'll need to see evidence of these claims. Good luck.

By the way, the President's name is Joe, not Hunter. Who gives a fuck about Hunter?

[chizzy]

Originally Posted by tommy156

Ok, so get to the part where this becomes an impeachable offense for Joe Biden. After you get there, we'll need to see evidence of these claims. Good luck.

By the way, the President's name is Joe, not Hunter. Who gives a fuck about Hunter?

U know hunter is toast, that's why u say who gives a fuck tommy. And if his boy was funneling money to
His daddy, either by direct transfer or by saying it was loans, he is the linchpin and yes good old Joe has done an impeachable offense.

[tommy156]

Originally Posted by chizzy

U know hunter is toast, that's why u say who gives a fuck tommy. And if his boy was funneling money to
His daddy, either by direct transfer or by saying it was loans, he is the linchpin and yes good old Joe has done an impeachable offense.

No, I say "who gives a fuck about Hunter" because I truly don't. He means about as much to me as Don Jr and Eric do (which is to say, nada).

As for the rest of your comment, if ifs and buts were candy and nuts, oh what a party we'd have...

Let me know when they have even a tiniest shred of evidence. It seems they should have lead with the "evidence" part, right? But they didn't, because they have none. This is nothing but a fishing expedition.

[onawbtngr546]

Hunter is, in my eyes, guilty... Yes.


But once again, what the fuck does having a guilty son mean for the father? It doesn't mean anything. Hunter could had laundered money, tax fraud, fucked a prostitute, who cares. Doesn't mean the father is at fault, or an accomplice to what his son does.
Should Joe still love and care about his son's well being? Fuck yes he should, because he is his son.


But again, loving your criminal child doesn't make you yourself a criminal.