Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > General Interest > The Political Forum
test
The Political Forum Discuss anything related to politics in this forum. World politics, US Politics, State and Local.

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 398
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 283
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70819
biomed163610
Yssup Rider61215
gman4453331
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48791
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino43158
The_Waco_Kid37374
CryptKicker37228
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old Today, 02:04 AM   #46
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,369
Default Mission of the Department of Health and Human Services.

The mission of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is to enhance the health and well-being of all Americans, by providing for effective health and human services and by fostering sound, sustained advances in the sciences underlying medicine, public health, and social services.

How can someone who doesn’t believe in the efficacy of vaccines possibly do that?

txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old Today, 07:04 AM   #47
VitaMan
Premium Access
 
VitaMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 27, 2010
Location: houston
Posts: 10,522
Encounters: 70
Default

Possibly because he has a claymation head ?


VitaMan is offline   Quote
Old Today, 09:48 AM   #48
eyecu2
Premium Access
 
eyecu2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 21, 2011
Location: Bonerville
Posts: 6,012
Encounters: 83
Default

IT's sad that Not ONE of DJTs nominee's meets a non-partisan view of acceptability. Disruption is one tool to make changes, but there are also conclusions and results driven appointments. For positive changes etc. I don't think he ever hired qualified ppl. Trump has only ever hired 'trusted confidants' vs qualified candidates. A serious issue for a guy who has a conspiracy crisis complex, and suffers from paranoia from doing so many underhanded and shady things. He doesn't know of another way to do things. He has to claim false conclusions and allege others of wrong doing, because that's what he does. He would beg, borrow and steal to get his way, especially out of jeopardy. It's been his thing. It's his schtick. These will end in the same epically bad way that this first administration did.

Kennedy is a moron who doesn't believe in science, but does know that eating road kills causes bad things to happen- cause that actually DID happen to him. He has that warbling voice from some other shit he's done;

“I can’t think of a darker day for public health and science itself than the election of Donald Trump and the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as secretary of health,” says Lawrence Gostin, director of Georgetown University’s O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law.

“To say that RFK Jr. is unqualified is a considerable understatement,” he continues. “The minimum qualification for being the head of the Department of Health and Human Services is fidelity to science and scientific evidence, and he spent his entire career fomenting distrust in public health and undermining science at every step of the way.”
eyecu2 is online now   Quote
Old Today, 10:36 AM   #49
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,234
Encounters: 25
Default

RFK Jr makes some good points, but if you think the current CDC is telling you the truth you are a bigger problem than person Trump has nominated for his cabinet.


The thing with vaccines is that they give a bunch to young kids starting school. Some diseases like measles, polio, or whooping cough it is a good thing and are necessary. But they have added mumps, chicken pox and a whole bunch of others that the risk from the vaccines is about the same as severe complications form the disease in young children. Giving too many vaccines in a short time period may cause more issues with immune systems as the body gets too many signals something is wrong.
farmstud60 is online now   Quote
Old Today, 10:40 AM   #50
Yssup Rider
Valued Poster
 
Yssup Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 3, 2010
Location: Clarksville
Posts: 61,215
Encounters: 67
Default

I think he's a Marxist, stud.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Yssup Rider is offline   Quote
Old Today, 11:14 AM   #51
TravelingHere
Premium Access
 
TravelingHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 8, 2024
Location: Texas
Posts: 524
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyecu2 View Post
Kennedy is a moron who doesn't believe in science
This is the main issue with your argument.
One shouldn't "believe in science", it's not a religion.
TravelingHere is online now   Quote
Old Today, 02:04 PM   #52
txdot-guy
Valued Poster
 
txdot-guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 1, 2010
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 2,369
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravelingHere View Post
This is the main issue with your argument.
One shouldn't "believe in science", it's not a religion.
I believe that eyecu2 is referring specifically to the scientific method.

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has been referred to while doing science since at least the 17th century. The scientific method involves careful observation coupled with rigorous scepticism, because cognitive assumptions can distort the interpretation of the observation. Scientific inquiry includes creating a testable hypothesis through inductive reasoning, testing it through experiments and statistical analysis, and adjusting or discarding the hypothesis based on the results.

The scientific method pulled us out of the dark ages into the age of enlightenment. It’s not a religion and should absolutely be believed.

Scepticism over results is part of the scientific method but sceptics of all kinds ignore the second half of the requirement. Inductive reasoning and statistical analysis.

RFK Jr and many like him feel that things are wrong but have not done the testing, inductive reasoning and statistical analysis to change their feelings into facts. But for some reason people still BELIEVE other wise. Why is anyone’s guess.
txdot-guy is online now   Quote
Old Today, 02:54 PM   #53
farmstud60
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 22, 2011
Location: Omaha, NE nearby
Posts: 3,234
Encounters: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
I believe that eyecu2 is referring specifically to the scientific method.

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has been referred to while doing science since at least the 17th century. The scientific method involves careful observation coupled with rigorous scepticism, because cognitive assumptions can distort the interpretation of the observation. Scientific inquiry includes creating a testable hypothesis through inductive reasoning, testing it through experiments and statistical analysis, and adjusting or discarding the hypothesis based on the results.

The scientific method pulled us out of the dark ages into the age of enlightenment. It’s not a religion and should absolutely be believed.

Scepticism over results is part of the scientific method but sceptics of all kinds ignore the second half of the requirement. Inductive reasoning and statistical analysis.

RFK Jr and many like him feel that things are wrong but have not done the testing, inductive reasoning and statistical analysis to change their feelings into facts. But for some reason people still BELIEVE other wise. Why is anyone’s guess.



Not true, anyone that doesn't believe the CDC which has questionable data itself is called a science denier.
farmstud60 is online now   Quote
Old Today, 03:16 PM   #54
TravelingHere
Premium Access
 
TravelingHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 8, 2024
Location: Texas
Posts: 524
Encounters: 4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by txdot-guy View Post
I believe that eyecu2 is referring specifically to the scientific method.

The scientific method is an empirical method for acquiring knowledge that has been referred to while doing science since at least the 17th century. The scientific method involves careful observation coupled with rigorous scepticism, because cognitive assumptions can distort the interpretation of the observation. Scientific inquiry includes creating a testable hypothesis through inductive reasoning, testing it through experiments and statistical analysis, and adjusting or discarding the hypothesis based on the results.

The scientific method pulled us out of the dark ages into the age of enlightenment. It’s not a religion and should absolutely be believed.

Scepticism over results is part of the scientific method but sceptics of all kinds ignore the second half of the requirement. Inductive reasoning and statistical analysis.

RFK Jr and many like him feel that things are wrong but have not done the testing, inductive reasoning and statistical analysis to change their feelings into facts. But for some reason people still BELIEVE other wise. Why is anyone’s guess.
The scientific method is an approach. The consequence is that science undergoes systematic re/evaluation.
The issue is when regulatory capture and entrenched interests subvert the pure scientific method.

We were ad nauseum reminded to "trust the science" in the events of the past couple of years, only to see the skeptics vindicated.
Is it any surprise that the pigs feeding off that mantra got rich in that time?

We were told processed foods like breakfast cereal were better that eggs, that lobotomies were good treatment, that mercury is a good treatment for syphilis, that Thalidomide is safe and effective, that oxycodone can't be abused, that was all settled science.
Add to that forgery, look at Alzheimer's research controversy.
There are plenty of conflicting motivations in science. If you propound the popular thing, you get grants, and get published. If you don't you get shunned.
RFKJ is a corrective move in this regard.

What does the guy do? He poses questions and thoughtfully addresses them. He doesn't have all the answers but there is plenty of research to draw on.

If he's such a kook let's have at it. Rather than smearing him let's open up that "Overton window" and discuss.
TravelingHere is online now   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved