Romney: POTUS candidate, dodging taxes through Swiss bank acc and Cayman Isl. investments.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It's simple. Even for you. Stop pretending they are in the same ballpark.

It is illegal to hide assets off shore for the purpose of avoiding income taxes.
Illegal.

Why do you keep asking for something that you have no legal right to see?
It's not illegal to keep your private records private. Thank God we have the Constitution to protect us from people like you. You respect the law of the land only when it suites you while claiming others are in violation of “your laws”.
It's not illegal to ignore people like yourself.
It never will be.

Munchie, what did Romney do that was illegal? I'm sure the Justice Department would want to know if you know something they don't.

And why are you afraid of Obama's records becoming public? Do you know something there as well? You know, if you were hiring him for an executive position, you would want, and he would provide ALL that information, but since he is running for President, he gets to hide it. And socialist automatons like you aid and abet his concealment of material information.

But it's Munchie. No one really cares. I just have a low tolerance for "stupid" tonight.

[Doove]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

But it's Munchie. No one really cares. I just have a low tolerance for "stupid" tonight.

You must really give yourself headaches sometimes.

[nwarounder]

What is truly funny, is all that oppose anyone having their wealth overseas, are the same ones that oppose making our country a favorable place to keep wealth, or even understand how to do so.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

BTW, you do realize it's illegal to make false claims on student aid applications, i.e., a Fulbright Foundation Scholarship. It has now been established that Odumbo was willing to misrepresent his country of origin when it suited his purposes.

It's getting tougher and tougher to cover for you. Quick, show proof Obama mis-represented himself. Actually and directly answer a question. Without an attempt at diversion by way of an inane off topic statement. You can be you all you want in a post just seconds after this one.
Please.

Do it for the gipper.

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

What is truly funny, is all that oppose anyone having their wealth overseas, are the same ones that oppose making our country a favorable place to keep wealth, or even understand how to do so.

Seems like some, skip over great statements like this....fuckem

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Munchie, what did Romney do that was illegal?

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

How would I know? I didn't say he did something illegal. Unlike some experts in douche-baggery, I don't claim people do things based on youtube or somebody’s blog. I'm sure the Justice Department would want to know if you know something they don't.

And why are you afraid of Obama's records becoming public? So this is your version of America. Ignore our laws and go with mob rule. Do what you want because you say so. Former attorney huh? Impossible. Do you know something there as well? You know, if you were hiring him for an executive position, you would want, and he would provide ALL that information, but since he is running for President, he gets to hide it. Yes, he would provide that information to the HR department of any corporation he chose to. Can you read? Any place he chooses to. That doesn't make it public. It would be need to know within the corporation. This shows how truly ignorant you are and that you have no affiliation with law, from an attorney's viewpoint. If you work for Corp X, can you call HR and demand to see the CEO's records? Of course not. And socialist automatons like you aid and abet his concealment of material information. How does trying to inform the ignorant aide and abet the privacy rights of our citizens? It doesn't. The Constitution aids, abets, and defines our privacy rights.

Where is a good death panel when you need it?
But it's Munchie. No one really cares. I just have a low tolerance for "stupid" tonight.

We all notice you use your definition of stupid ("stupid"). From the guy who sets the standard for being stupid, your use of "stupid" is probably.....stupid.

One last time. The public has no right to see those records.


Now go clean yourself off. You smell like shit.

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

It's getting tougher and tougher to cover for you. Quick, show proof Obama mis-represented himself. Actually and directly answer a question. Without an attempt at diversion by way of an inane off topic statement. You can be you all you want in a post just seconds after this one.
Please.

Do it for the gipper.

Odumbo had personal control over what his literary agent used in the flyer -- for sixteen years. Authors managed by Dystel [Odumbo’s literary agency] are directed to do the following:

Nonfiction Proposal Guidelines

We [Dystel] work very hard with our clients [authors like Odumbo] to help them create their [the authors': Odumbo's] proposals and because we think this part of the publishing process is so very important, we wanted to share our basic formula for putting together a non-fiction proposal [written by the author: Odumbo].
The proposal is broken down into several parts:
The first is the Overview. This begins with a brief dramatic anecdote which is meant to get the reader, in this case the editor at the publishing company, interested in the material. Immediately after this anecdote, you [the author: Odumbo]should describe in two or three sentences—no more—what the book will be about. This is followed by another brief paragraph on why it is being written and then another on why you [the author: Odumbo] are qualified to write it.


http://www.dystel.com/nonfiction-proposal-guidelines

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

One last time. The public has no right to see those records.[/B][/SIZE][/COLOR][/FONT]

But Munchie. We do. You are wrong.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Odumbo had personal control over what his literary agent used in the flyer -- for sixteen years. There was only one printing of the booklet. In 1991. The only book of Obama's that was ever promoted by this pamphlet was never published. Authors managed by Dystel [Odumbo’s literary agency] are directed to do the following:

Nonfiction Proposal Guidelines

We [Dystel] work very hard with our clients [authors like Odumbo] to help them create their [the authors': Odumbo's] proposals and because we think this part of the publishing process is so very important, we wanted to share our basic formula for putting together a non-fiction proposal [written by the author: Odumbo].
The proposal is broken down into several parts:
The first is the Overview. This begins with a brief dramatic anecdote which is meant to get the reader, in this case the editor at the publishing company, interested in the material. Immediately after this anecdote, you [the author: Odumbo]should describe in two or three sentences—no more—what the book will be about. This is followed by another brief paragraph on why it is being written and then another on why you [the author: Odumbo] are qualified to write it.


http://www.dystel.com/nonfiction-proposal-guidelines

You are on your own. I can’t cover for you any more.

In the future you must try harder. This attempt threatens to redefine lame.

This booklet was covered in a thread using Briebart.com as the source. The article clearly stated that a literary agent wrote the blurb used on the blue booklet and that he took responsibility for the error of the country of birth (hint, hint).
Are you responsible? Last chance to admit you misrepresented the info in this post.

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

But Munchie. We do. You are wrong.

OK. You are right. Whatever you say. Just put the knife down. You have a thousand reasons to live.

Alright. You caught me in a lie. You're intruding and trampling other's rights, you are wrong, and you really have no reasons to live.

Kill yourself.

[nwarounder]

Is the multi quote function broke?

[IIFFOFRDB]

Originally Posted by nwarounder

Is the multi quote function broke?

I don't know about the multi quote function. I do know IB just blasted Munchass all to hell......fuckem

[I B Hankering]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You are on your own. I can’t cover for you any more.

In the future you must try harder. This attempt threatens to redefine lame.

This booklet was covered in a thread using Briebart.com as the source. The article clearly stated that a literary agent wrote the blurb used on the blue booklet and that he took responsibility for the error of the country of birth (hint, hint).
Are you responsible? Last chance to admit you misrepresented the info in this post.

Munchie, Merriam-Webster defines lie as follows:

LIE

intransitive verb
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive

2 : to create a false or misleading impression

Odumbo, at a minimum, is guilty of 'creating a false or misleading impression' for sixteen years. FYI, that meets the definition of a 'lie'.

Furthermore, what the literary agent 'admits' to doing (yeah, right) is contrary to the company's policy of having the authors write their own bios. Dystel directs all its other authors to write their own bios. Are you claiming Odumbo hasn't the talent to do his own writing? BTW, you wouldn't be the first to make that claim. Plus, neither the agent nor Odumbo made a correction to that bio for sixteen years; hence, they both perpetuated the lie -- for sixteen years.

Munchie, you just wasted an opportunity to prove you are not a Kool Aid drinking fool. Shame, shame, shame.

[CuteOldGuy]

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

OK. You are right. Whatever you say. Just put the knife down. You have a thousand reasons to live.

Alright. You caught me in a lie. You're intruding and trampling other's rights, you are wrong, and you really have no reasons to live.

Kill yourself.

Geez, I'm not feeling the love. Munchie, since I'm still alive, answer me this. If you were in charge of a major company, and you had to hire a senior executive, what would you want to know about him? If you asked for transcripts, or the other information, and he said no, would you still hire him?

I didn't think so.

Not me >>>>LOL!

[Munchmasterman]

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Munchie, Merriam-Webster defines lie as follows:

LIE

intransitive verb
1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive

2 : to create a false or misleading impression

Odumbo, at a minimum, is guilty of 'creating a false or misleading impression' for sixteen years. FYI, that meets the definition of a 'lie'.

Furthermore, what the literary agent 'admits' to doing (yeah, right) is contrary to the company's policy of having the authors write their own bios. Dystel directs all its other authors to write their own bios. Are you claiming Odumbo hasn't the talent to do his own writing? BTW, you wouldn't be the first to make that claim. Plus, neither the agent nor Odumbo made a correction to that bio for sixteen years; hence, they both perpetuated the lie -- for sixteen years.

Munchie, you just wasted an opportunity to prove you are not a Kool Aid drinking fool. Shame, shame, shame.

What I wasted was my time. Trying to educate you.

Now you accuse him of claiming to have not been born in the US.

The name of the thread says it all.

You just have to love it. Obamas agent says he was born in Kenya.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=451829

Go to this link so you know some of the facts.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...donesia-Hawaii

To recap. Obama did not write the blurb. None of the people in the booklet wrote their own. The booklet was a 15 year anniversary special edition. It was published once. 1 time, not 2 or 3 or 4 or etc.
That bio never appeared any place other than that booklet.

How do you correct a booklet that is printed once? It's easy. When someone asks about it, you correct the story they heard. When asked in 2007, he corrected the story. It promoted a book he never published. So according to you I suppose that was a lie by Obama too.
Twist the facts into any scenario you want. You will anyways.

This time you were wrong....again.