Welcome to ECCIE, become a part of the fastest growing adult community. Take a minute & sign up!

Welcome to ECCIE - Sign up today!

Become a part of one of the fastest growing adult communities online. We have something for you, whether you’re a male member seeking out new friends or a new lady on the scene looking to take advantage of our many opportunities to network, make new friends, or connect with people. Join today & take part in lively discussions, take advantage of all the great features that attract hundreds of new daily members!

Go Premium

Go Back   ECCIE Worldwide > Texas > Dallas > The Sandbox - Dallas
test
The Sandbox - Dallas The Sandbox is a collection of off-topic discussions. Humorous threads, Sports talk, and a wide variety of other topics can be found here. If it's NOT an adult-themed topic, then it belongs here

Most Favorited Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Most Liked Images
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
  • Thumb
Top Reviewers
cockalatte 649
MoneyManMatt 490
Still Looking 399
samcruz 399
Jon Bon 397
Harley Diablo 377
honest_abe 362
DFW_Ladies_Man 313
Chung Tran 288
lupegarland 287
nicemusic 285
Starscream66 281
You&Me 281
George Spelvin 270
sharkman29 256
Top Posters
DallasRain70817
biomed163509
Yssup Rider61142
gman4453310
LexusLover51038
offshoredrilling48762
WTF48267
pyramider46370
bambino42987
The_Waco_Kid37301
CryptKicker37225
Mokoa36497
Chung Tran36100
Still Looking35944
Mojojo33117

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-01-2015, 03:17 PM   #46
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chung Tran View Post
if Officer Ramos' brother doesn't mind playing golf during the Wake, why should Obama?



that's a joke people..
You are not joking, Chung. If Obama needs to make a resounding statement by attending Officer Ramo's funeral, then he ought to be there, regardless whoelse is there or not....
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 03:21 PM   #47
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldButStillGoing View Post
Give it a break. Hes on vacation 1/2 around the world. He did send the 2ed most useless politician in the country to the funeral.
I suppose you won't alter or even rescind your statement if the VP is Dick Cheney....
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 03:46 PM   #48
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

[QUOTE=slingblade;1056196398]I agree with you. I hit the RTM button but I guess it is within the guidelines of the forum. That being said I have a few comments for the op and the de Blasio deal.
Since when did the POTUS go to every Cops funeral or any for that matter?
The Cops had already said they did not want either of them there and then turned their backs on the Mayor, just like they have the citizens in my opinion.


Then the prez should have called their bluff in front of the whole nation, or stops visiting military establishments and quits his post as Commander-in-Chief.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 03:57 PM   #49
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wheretonow View Post
When the grand jury in the Brown case, after hearing ALL of the evidence, no-billed the police officer, what did Obama/Holder do? Decided to investigate the police department.

When the Garner grand jury, after hearing ALL the evidence, no-billed the officers involved, what did Obama/Holder do? Decided to investigate the police department.

So much for even-handedness...
You were a militaryman yourself, so you should have good knowledge of politics, both military and government. The prez did what he had to do under tremendous pressure from AA communities, no more, no less, that's it.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 05:50 PM   #50
doug_dfw
Valued Poster
 
doug_dfw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1, 2010
Location: Arlington
Posts: 2,103
Encounters: 1
Default

[QUOTE=andymarksman;1056203082]
Quote:
Originally Posted by slingblade View Post
I agree with you. I hit the RTM button but I guess it is within the guidelines of the forum. That being said I have a few comments for the op and the de Blasio deal.
Since when did the POTUS go to every Cops funeral or any for that matter?
The Cops had already said they did not want either of them there and then turned their backs on the Mayor, just like they have the citizens in my opinion.


Then the prez should have called their bluff in front of the whole nation, or stops visiting military establishments and quits his post as Commander-in-Chief.
The Prez oops Dictator in Chief only goes to the defence of law breakers- ergo no police or military funerals; and calls the killers of military or police- workplace violence.
doug_dfw is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 05:51 PM   #51
doug_dfw
Valued Poster
 
doug_dfw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1, 2010
Location: Arlington
Posts: 2,103
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
You were a militaryman yourself, so you should have good knowledge of politics, both military and government. The prez did what he had to do under tremendous pressure from AA communities, no more, no less, that's it.
You are right- but bowing to 12% of Americans is racist.
doug_dfw is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 06:00 PM   #52
doug_dfw
Valued Poster
 
doug_dfw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1, 2010
Location: Arlington
Posts: 2,103
Encounters: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
You were a militaryman yourself, so you should have good knowledge of politics, both military and government. The prez did what he had to do under tremendous pressure from AA communities, no more, no less, that's it.
Yes you are right. He caved to 12% when he is Prez of all; he does not recognize that fact because he is Dictator ( Some same King but that is a medieval term). Some say because he is Black; he is not. Unless he is Muslim because Mothers don't count. Christians and Jews recognize and love their Mothers. He leads the sheep into the waters of Jordan and the some of us stand on the beach. Us who ran up the mountain will see tomorrow, 2025
doug_dfw is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 06:29 PM   #53
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by doug_dfw View Post
You are right- but bowing to 12% of Americans is racist.
I hope you have the guts to call Bush Senior a racist since he had launched investigations on cops who had brutally beaten Rodney King for civil right violations.
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 06:53 PM   #54
Wheretonow
Valued Poster
 
Wheretonow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 584
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
I hope you have the guts to call Bush Senior a racist since he had launched investigations on cops who had brutally beaten Rodney King for civil right violations.
The Rodney King incident is an interesting one. There were three other blacks in the car with him, none of whom were beaten or tazered. But then they didn't resist arrest.
Wheretonow is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 07:04 PM   #55
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Did Rodney King resist arrest???????
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 07:35 PM   #56
Wheretonow
Valued Poster
 
Wheretonow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 584
Encounters: 15
Default When Facts Are Obsolete

Quote:
Originally Posted by andymarksman View Post
Did Rodney King resist arrest???????
An interesting article about Rodney King, et al:

When Facts Are Obsolete

"Some of us, who are old enough to remember the old television police series Dragnet may remember Sergeant Joe Friday saying, “Just the facts, ma’am.” But that would be completely out of place today. Facts are becoming obsolete, as recent events have demonstrated.

What matters today is how well you can concoct a story that fits people’s preconceptions and arouses their emotions. Politicians like New York mayor Bill de Blasio, professional demagogues like Al Sharpton, and innumerable irresponsible people in the media have shown that they have great talent in promoting a lynch-mob atmosphere toward the police.

Grand juries that examine hard facts live in a different world from mobs who listen to rhetoric and politicians who cater to the mobs.

During the controversy over the death of Trayvon Martin, for example, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus said that George Zimmerman had tracked Trayvon Martin down and shot him like a dog. The fact is that Zimmerman did not have to track down Trayvon Martin, who was sitting right on top of him, punching him till his face was bloody.
After the death of Michael Brown, members of the Congressional Black Caucus stood up in Congress, with their hands held up, saying, “Don’t shoot.” Although there were some who claimed that this is what Michael Brown said and did, there were other witnesses — all black, by the way — who said that Brown was charging toward the policeman when he was shot.

What was decisive was not what either set of witnesses said but what the autopsy revealed, an investigation involving three sets of forensic experts, including one representing Michael Brown’s family. Witnesses can lie but the physical facts don’t lie, even if politicians, mobs, and the media prefer to take lies seriously.

The death of Eric Garner has likewise spawned stories having little relationship to facts. The story is that Garner died because a chokehold stopped his breathing. But Garner did not die with a policeman choking him.

He died later, in an ambulance where his heart stopped. He had a long medical history of various diseases, as well as a long criminal history. No doubt the stress of his capture did not do him any good, and he might well still be alive if he had not resisted arrest. But that was his choice.

Despite people who say blithely that the police need more “training,” there is no “kinder and gentler” way to capture a 350-pound man, who is capable of inflicting grievous harm, and perhaps even death, on any of his would-be captors. The magic word “unarmed” means nothing in practice, however much the word may hype emotions.

If you are killed by an unarmed man, you are just as dead as if you had been annihilated by a nuclear bomb. But you don’t even know who is armed or unarmed until after it is all over and you can search him.

Incidentally, did you know that, during this same period when riots, looting, and arson have been raging, a black policeman in Alabama shot and killed an unarmed white teenager — and was cleared by a grand jury? Probably not, if you depend on the mainstream media for your news.

The media do not merely ignore facts, they suppress facts. Millions of people saw the videotape of the beating of Rodney King. But they saw only a fraction of that tape because the media left out the rest, which showed Rodney King — another huge man — resisting arrest and refusing to be handcuffed, so that he could be searched.

Television viewers did not get to see the other black men in the same vehicle that Rodney King was driving recklessly. Those other black men were not beaten. And the grand jury got to see the whole video, after which they acquitted the police — and the media then published the jurors’ home addresses.

Such media retribution against people they don’t like is part of a growing lynch-mob mentality. The black witnesses in Missouri, whose testimony confirmed what the police officer said, expressed fears for their own safety for telling what the physical evidence showed was the truth.

Is this what we want? Grand juries responding to mobs and the media, instead of to the facts?

— Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution. © 2013 Creators Syndicate, Inc."

A link to the article is here:

http://m.nationalreview.com/article/...-thomas-sowell
Wheretonow is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 09:26 PM   #57
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

Here is the full length video of Rodney King beating incident, I'll let the video speak for itself:

http://wn.com/rodney_king_beating_video

And here is the CNN documentary:

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=14a_1310712216
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 10:23 PM   #58
Dogoffhisleash
BANNED
 
Dogoffhisleash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 4, 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 40
Encounters: 3
Default

The media do not merely ignore facts, they suppress facts. Millions of people saw the videotape of the beating of Rodney King. But they saw only a fraction of that tape because the media left out the rest, which showed Rodney King — another huge man — resisting arrest and refusing to be handcuffed, so that he could be searched.

Television viewers did not get to see the other black men in the same vehicle that Rodney King was driving recklessly. Those other black men were not beaten. And the grand jury got to see the whole video, after which they acquitted the police — and the media then published the jurors’ home addresses.

l[/QUOTE]


It's hard to take your argument seriously when you post an article as some sort of authority and that article is completely inaccurate.

First of all the fact that the author doesn't know the difference between a Grand Jury and Jury makes him lose all credibility. The officers when to trial which means a Grand Jury true billed them saying there was probably cause to file charges, a grand jury does not acquit or convict anyone. A trial jury heard the evidence and acquitted the officers, but that evidence was presented in open court which means everyone in the public saw everything that was presented including the entire video.

Secondly there were only two other men in the car not three, that mistake was yours and not the authors, but even a cursory search of articles relating to this story will show that both of the other men were beaten, one to the point he had to be taken to the hospital due to a laceration on his head. His bloody hat became evidence in the trial.

If you are trying to convince people that Rodney King got what he deserved you're going to need to come with something stronger than that article.
Dogoffhisleash is offline   Quote
Old 01-01-2015, 11:56 PM   #59
andymarksman
Valued Poster
 
Join Date: Nov 11, 2014
Location: dallas
Posts: 1,630
Default

I can tell you are running wild and very happy now....
andymarksman is offline   Quote
Old 01-02-2015, 04:28 AM   #60
Wheretonow
Valued Poster
 
Wheretonow's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Location: North Texas
Posts: 584
Encounters: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogoffhisleash View Post
The media do not merely ignore facts, they suppress facts. Millions of people saw the videotape of the beating of Rodney King. But they saw only a fraction of that tape because the media left out the rest, which showed Rodney King — another huge man — resisting arrest and refusing to be handcuffed, so that he could be

It's hard to take your argument seriously when you post an article as some sort of authority and that article is completely inaccurate.

First of all the fact that the author doesn't know the difference between a Grand Jury and Jury makes him lose all credibility. The officers when to trial which means a Grand Jury true billed them saying there was probably cause to file charges, a grand jury does not acquit or convict anyone. A trial jury heard the evidence and acquitted the officers, but that evidence was presented in open court which means everyone in the public saw everything that was presented including the entire video.

Secondly there were only two other men in the car not three, that mistake was yours and not the authors, but even a cursory search of articles relating to this story will show that both of the other men were beaten, one to the point he had to be taken to the hospital due to a laceration on his head. His bloody hat became evidence in the trial.

If you are trying to convince people that Rodney King got what he deserved you're going to need to come with something stronger than that article.
First off I didn't put forth any "argument", but rather in response to another poster mentioning Rodney King, I posted an article I found "interesting". I didn't place any value judgent on the article.

I apologize for misstating the number of other occupants in the vehicle.

A civil jury awarded Mr. King a huge chuck of change as a result of the incident, and I have no problem with that. That tape, whether you watch it in its entirety or some edited portion, clearly indicates that Mr. King did not deserve the treatment that he got.

And you are correct that the other occupants received injuries as well.
Wheretonow is offline   Quote
Reply



AMPReviews.net
Find Ladies
Hot Women

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright © 2009 - 2016, ECCIE Worldwide, All Rights Reserved